Small Ship, Big War - The Voyages of the Hibiki

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Onime No Kyo
Posts: 16846
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 5:55 am

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by Onime No Kyo »

I just hope its not a thrilling narrative of Hibiki's last moments afloat. [X(]
"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by Shark7 »

ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo

I just hope its not a thrilling narrative of Hibiki's last moments afloat. [X(]

Yeah, "small lifeboat, big war" wouldn't be quite the same. [:(]
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
Alikchi2
Posts: 1786
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:29 pm
Contact:

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by Alikchi2 »

I'm all on tenterhooks over here! Nice foreshadowing!

As a great actor once said, "Oh God oh man oh God oh man oh God oh man oh God oh man"
Commander Stormwolf
Posts: 1623
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:11 pm

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by Commander Stormwolf »

A blanket of B-29 droppings perhaps

[8D]
"No Enemy Survives Contact with the Plan" - Commander Stormwolf
User avatar
cantona2
Posts: 3749
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Gibraltar

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by cantona2 »

Cry Havoc and let loose the Dogs of War
1966 was a great year for English Football...Eric was born

User avatar
Admiral DadMan
Posts: 3426
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2002 10:00 am
Location: A Lion uses all its might to catch a Rabbit

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by Admiral DadMan »

ORIGINAL: Shark7

ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo

I just hope its not a thrilling narrative of Hibiki's last moments afloat. [X(]

Yeah, "small lifeboat, big war" wouldn't be quite the same. [:(]
Ohhh Shark! You missed a great opportunity!

"Small Lifeboat, Big Shark"!!!!!!!
Scenario 127: "Scraps of Paper"
(\../)
(O.o)
(> <)

CVB Langley:
Image
Cuttlefish
Posts: 2454
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:03 am
Location: Oregon, USA

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by Cuttlefish »

A screen shot of Hibiki in action from the previous turn.



Image
Attachments
hibiki_110744.jpg
hibiki_110744.jpg (51.49 KiB) Viewed 365 times
Image
User avatar
tocaff
Posts: 4765
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:30 pm
Location: USA now in Brasil

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by tocaff »

A mere nothing on the way to the main event.
Todd

I never thought that doing an AAR would be so time consuming and difficult.
www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2080768
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by Canoerebel »

What if that had been the SS Cuttlefish engaged against the Hibiki?
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by Capt. Harlock »

Racing, though they don’t yet know it, into the heart of the greatest air and naval battle of World War II.

Hmm . . . I seem to recall that Morris Eliot Samuelson described the fracas that turned the tide to the Allies as the "Greatest Naval Battle in History".

Gambare, Hibiki!
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17790
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

What if that had been the SS Cuttlefish engaged against the Hibiki?
THAT would have been funny!
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
Cuttlefish
Posts: 2454
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:03 am
Location: Oregon, USA

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by Cuttlefish »

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
Racing, though they don’t yet know it, into the heart of the greatest air and naval battle of World War II.

Hmm . . . I seem to recall that Morris Eliot Samuelson described the fracas that turned the tide to the Allies as the "Greatest Naval Battle in History".

Gambette, Hibiki!

Good memory! He referred to the Battle of Santa Cruz using those terms. I will plead that what he meant was that it was the biggest naval battle to that point. The upcoming battle is unquestionably larger in scope. I also think that I am safe in predicting that this version of the war, now in April '45, will not see one larger.

Image
User avatar
String
Posts: 2661
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Estonia

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by String »

Nngghhh.. and i thought it was an update...[:o]
Surface combat TF fanboy
Cuttlefish
Posts: 2454
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:03 am
Location: Oregon, USA

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by Cuttlefish »

November 8, 1944 (prelude)

Location: ?
Course: ?
Attached to: TF 27
Mission: Surface Combat
System Damage: ?
Float Damage: ?
Fires: ?
Fuel: ?

Orders: Engage enemy forces at Iwo Jima

---

Admiral Yamamoto’s goal is to prevent the Allies from landing enough troops to capture Iwo Jima. He knows the Army has many troops there and that they are well dug-in and well supplied. He has to trust that if he gives them a chance they can hold the island. But he also knows that if the enemy is allowed to land unopposed no amount of courage or supplies will enable Japan to win.

His objective, then, is to sink or damage as many of the enemy’s transports as possible. Most of his subordinates burn with eagerness to come to grips with the enemy warships, now pinned in place protecting the invasion, but Yamamoto knows that there is no way to attempt this and win. Even a year ago he too would have made it his primary objective, but things have changed. The only possible way now to ensure Japan’s survival, he believes, is to keep the enemy’s fighters out of range of the Home Islands and prolong the fighting to the point where the enemy is willing to once more willing to negotiate. It is not a good chance, he knows, but it is all he has left. That means denying Iwo to the enemy, and that means destroying the bulk of the enemy’s forces before they can land.

So the transports are the target. The tactical problem confronting the dour admiral is how to break through the enemy’s powerful surface and carrier groups to achieve this. The traditional Japanese night attack will not work: carrier forces surround the island and any Japanese force that attempts to get close enough for a night attack will be promptly destroyed.

So Yamamoto has evolved a plan. It is simple in concept but requires precise timing. Japan’s carrier force has been partly rebuilt over the past year with the addition of Taiho and three Unryu-class carriers. It is no match at all for the Allied carriers, of course, but it is a force too strong to be ignored. These carriers will depart Kagoshima and proceed east, approaching Iwo Jima from the northwest.

They will, of course, be detected. Yamamoto is counting on the enemy carrier forces moving northwest to intercept his own carriers, leaving the island uncovered. At the same time three Japanese surface forces will race in from the northeast. Arriving at the island unmolested by enemy airpower they will strive to evade or break through the enemy surface forces and get to the transports.

This, at least, is the plan. As the sun rises on November 8th the Japanese forces are in motion under clear skies, six task forces comprising almost 100 warships. The time for planning is over. The time for battle is at hand.

Image
User avatar
thegreatwent
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Denver, CO

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by thegreatwent »

Sounds kinda like the plan at Leyte[X(]. I just hope some of those carriers have aircraft.
Alikchi2
Posts: 1786
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:29 pm
Contact:

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by Alikchi2 »

A good plan.. well, the ONLY plan with any hint of success..

*steels himself*
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by Mynok »


"Success" might be a bit strong of a word. [:'(]
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7200
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by Feinder »

Sounds kinda like the plan at Leyte

Yeah, and we all know how that turned out...

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
User avatar
thegreatwent
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Denver, CO

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by thegreatwent »

Well hopefully Taffy isn't in the way[:)]
User avatar
Heeward
Posts: 343
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:17 pm
Location: Lacey Washington

RE: Small Ship, Big War

Post by Heeward »

For him to succeed all he has to do is to take the Island and establish a supplied base force.
&nbsp;
If&nbsp;allied fighter cover make your air strikes essentially ineffective then&nbsp;he can ignore your air combat task force(s) and hold off Iwo Jima. You may have to send the CV's&nbsp;as a direct&nbsp;sacrificial cover force for your surface combat surface task forces.
&nbsp;
Does your opponent&nbsp;have long range&nbsp;air search ability in this area?
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
The Wake
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”