Small Ship, Big War - The Voyages of the Hibiki
Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami
- Onime No Kyo
- Posts: 16846
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 5:55 am
RE: Small Ship, Big War
I just hope its not a thrilling narrative of Hibiki's last moments afloat. [X(]
"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok
RE: Small Ship, Big War
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
I just hope its not a thrilling narrative of Hibiki's last moments afloat. [X(]
Yeah, "small lifeboat, big war" wouldn't be quite the same. [:(]
Distant Worlds Fan
'When in doubt...attack!'
'When in doubt...attack!'
RE: Small Ship, Big War
I'm all on tenterhooks over here! Nice foreshadowing!
As a great actor once said, "Oh God oh man oh God oh man oh God oh man oh God oh man"
As a great actor once said, "Oh God oh man oh God oh man oh God oh man oh God oh man"
-
Commander Stormwolf
- Posts: 1623
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:11 pm
RE: Small Ship, Big War
A blanket of B-29 droppings perhaps
[8D]
[8D]
"No Enemy Survives Contact with the Plan" - Commander Stormwolf
RE: Small Ship, Big War
Cry Havoc and let loose the Dogs of War
1966 was a great year for English Football...Eric was born
- Admiral DadMan
- Posts: 3426
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2002 10:00 am
- Location: A Lion uses all its might to catch a Rabbit
RE: Small Ship, Big War
Ohhh Shark! You missed a great opportunity!ORIGINAL: Shark7
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
I just hope its not a thrilling narrative of Hibiki's last moments afloat. [X(]
Yeah, "small lifeboat, big war" wouldn't be quite the same. [:(]
"Small Lifeboat, Big Shark"!!!!!!!
-
Cuttlefish
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:03 am
- Location: Oregon, USA
RE: Small Ship, Big War
A screen shot of Hibiki in action from the previous turn.


- Attachments
-
- hibiki_110744.jpg (51.49 KiB) Viewed 365 times

RE: Small Ship, Big War
A mere nothing on the way to the main event.
Todd
I never thought that doing an AAR would be so time consuming and difficult.
www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2080768
I never thought that doing an AAR would be so time consuming and difficult.
www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2080768
- Canoerebel
- Posts: 21099
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
- Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
- Contact:
RE: Small Ship, Big War
What if that had been the SS Cuttlefish engaged against the Hibiki?
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
- Capt. Harlock
- Posts: 5379
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
RE: Small Ship, Big War
Racing, though they don’t yet know it, into the heart of the greatest air and naval battle of World War II.
Hmm . . . I seem to recall that Morris Eliot Samuelson described the fracas that turned the tide to the Allies as the "Greatest Naval Battle in History".
Gambare, Hibiki!
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?
--Victor Hugo
--Victor Hugo
RE: Small Ship, Big War
THAT would have been funny!ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
What if that had been the SS Cuttlefish engaged against the Hibiki?

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
-
Cuttlefish
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:03 am
- Location: Oregon, USA
RE: Small Ship, Big War
ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
Racing, though they don’t yet know it, into the heart of the greatest air and naval battle of World War II.
Hmm . . . I seem to recall that Morris Eliot Samuelson described the fracas that turned the tide to the Allies as the "Greatest Naval Battle in History".
Gambette, Hibiki!
Good memory! He referred to the Battle of Santa Cruz using those terms. I will plead that what he meant was that it was the biggest naval battle to that point. The upcoming battle is unquestionably larger in scope. I also think that I am safe in predicting that this version of the war, now in April '45, will not see one larger.

-
Cuttlefish
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:03 am
- Location: Oregon, USA
RE: Small Ship, Big War
November 8, 1944 (prelude)
Location: ?
Course: ?
Attached to: TF 27
Mission: Surface Combat
System Damage: ?
Float Damage: ?
Fires: ?
Fuel: ?
Orders: Engage enemy forces at Iwo Jima
---
Admiral Yamamoto’s goal is to prevent the Allies from landing enough troops to capture Iwo Jima. He knows the Army has many troops there and that they are well dug-in and well supplied. He has to trust that if he gives them a chance they can hold the island. But he also knows that if the enemy is allowed to land unopposed no amount of courage or supplies will enable Japan to win.
His objective, then, is to sink or damage as many of the enemy’s transports as possible. Most of his subordinates burn with eagerness to come to grips with the enemy warships, now pinned in place protecting the invasion, but Yamamoto knows that there is no way to attempt this and win. Even a year ago he too would have made it his primary objective, but things have changed. The only possible way now to ensure Japan’s survival, he believes, is to keep the enemy’s fighters out of range of the Home Islands and prolong the fighting to the point where the enemy is willing to once more willing to negotiate. It is not a good chance, he knows, but it is all he has left. That means denying Iwo to the enemy, and that means destroying the bulk of the enemy’s forces before they can land.
So the transports are the target. The tactical problem confronting the dour admiral is how to break through the enemy’s powerful surface and carrier groups to achieve this. The traditional Japanese night attack will not work: carrier forces surround the island and any Japanese force that attempts to get close enough for a night attack will be promptly destroyed.
So Yamamoto has evolved a plan. It is simple in concept but requires precise timing. Japan’s carrier force has been partly rebuilt over the past year with the addition of Taiho and three Unryu-class carriers. It is no match at all for the Allied carriers, of course, but it is a force too strong to be ignored. These carriers will depart Kagoshima and proceed east, approaching Iwo Jima from the northwest.
They will, of course, be detected. Yamamoto is counting on the enemy carrier forces moving northwest to intercept his own carriers, leaving the island uncovered. At the same time three Japanese surface forces will race in from the northeast. Arriving at the island unmolested by enemy airpower they will strive to evade or break through the enemy surface forces and get to the transports.
This, at least, is the plan. As the sun rises on November 8th the Japanese forces are in motion under clear skies, six task forces comprising almost 100 warships. The time for planning is over. The time for battle is at hand.
Location: ?
Course: ?
Attached to: TF 27
Mission: Surface Combat
System Damage: ?
Float Damage: ?
Fires: ?
Fuel: ?
Orders: Engage enemy forces at Iwo Jima
---
Admiral Yamamoto’s goal is to prevent the Allies from landing enough troops to capture Iwo Jima. He knows the Army has many troops there and that they are well dug-in and well supplied. He has to trust that if he gives them a chance they can hold the island. But he also knows that if the enemy is allowed to land unopposed no amount of courage or supplies will enable Japan to win.
His objective, then, is to sink or damage as many of the enemy’s transports as possible. Most of his subordinates burn with eagerness to come to grips with the enemy warships, now pinned in place protecting the invasion, but Yamamoto knows that there is no way to attempt this and win. Even a year ago he too would have made it his primary objective, but things have changed. The only possible way now to ensure Japan’s survival, he believes, is to keep the enemy’s fighters out of range of the Home Islands and prolong the fighting to the point where the enemy is willing to once more willing to negotiate. It is not a good chance, he knows, but it is all he has left. That means denying Iwo to the enemy, and that means destroying the bulk of the enemy’s forces before they can land.
So the transports are the target. The tactical problem confronting the dour admiral is how to break through the enemy’s powerful surface and carrier groups to achieve this. The traditional Japanese night attack will not work: carrier forces surround the island and any Japanese force that attempts to get close enough for a night attack will be promptly destroyed.
So Yamamoto has evolved a plan. It is simple in concept but requires precise timing. Japan’s carrier force has been partly rebuilt over the past year with the addition of Taiho and three Unryu-class carriers. It is no match at all for the Allied carriers, of course, but it is a force too strong to be ignored. These carriers will depart Kagoshima and proceed east, approaching Iwo Jima from the northwest.
They will, of course, be detected. Yamamoto is counting on the enemy carrier forces moving northwest to intercept his own carriers, leaving the island uncovered. At the same time three Japanese surface forces will race in from the northeast. Arriving at the island unmolested by enemy airpower they will strive to evade or break through the enemy surface forces and get to the transports.
This, at least, is the plan. As the sun rises on November 8th the Japanese forces are in motion under clear skies, six task forces comprising almost 100 warships. The time for planning is over. The time for battle is at hand.

- thegreatwent
- Posts: 3011
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:42 am
- Location: Denver, CO
RE: Small Ship, Big War
Sounds kinda like the plan at Leyte[X(]. I just hope some of those carriers have aircraft.
RE: Small Ship, Big War
A good plan.. well, the ONLY plan with any hint of success..
*steels himself*
*steels himself*
RE: Small Ship, Big War
"Success" might be a bit strong of a word. [:'(]
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
RE: Small Ship, Big War
Sounds kinda like the plan at Leyte
Yeah, and we all know how that turned out...

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

- thegreatwent
- Posts: 3011
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:42 am
- Location: Denver, CO
RE: Small Ship, Big War
Well hopefully Taffy isn't in the way[:)]
RE: Small Ship, Big War
For him to succeed all he has to do is to take the Island and establish a supplied base force.
If allied fighter cover make your air strikes essentially ineffective then he can ignore your air combat task force(s) and hold off Iwo Jima. You may have to send the CV's as a direct sacrificial cover force for your surface combat surface task forces.
Does your opponent have long range air search ability in this area?
If allied fighter cover make your air strikes essentially ineffective then he can ignore your air combat task force(s) and hold off Iwo Jima. You may have to send the CV's as a direct sacrificial cover force for your surface combat surface task forces.
Does your opponent have long range air search ability in this area?
The Wake










