Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

SireChaos
Posts: 710
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:11 pm
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by SireChaos »

ORIGINAL: Ursa MAior

There is definitely somthing wrong with the names of US ships nowadays.

Check LCS Freedom AFAIK next is Independence. What comes after? LCS Democracy?

Someone is taking the names of soviet warships from the fifties.

Brave new world.

Wasn´t the US CVL class in WW2 named Independence (sorry I´m not sure right now, I am jet lagged)? So that name has been around quite a bit longer. Also there was a USS Constitution.

I don´t like naming ships after living people, either. Nor that so many respectable carrier names (like Yorktown) are tied up as cruisers. Personally, I´d have reserved the "carrier name pool" for carriers and old battleship and/or cruiser names for cruisers.
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by Terminus »

Too few carriers around these days to save all those names...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7670
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by wdolson »

ORIGINAL: Ursa MAior

There is definitely somthing wrong with the names of US ships nowadays.

Check LCS Freedom AFAIK next is Independence. What comes after? LCS Democracy?

Someone is taking the names of soviet warships from the fifties.

Brave new world.

It seems like the more the US government talks about freedom and democracy, the less they practice it. The US is far, far from German style fascism of the 40s, but it has too much similarity to Italian and Spanish style fascism for my comfort.

Bill
SCW Development Team
Gregg
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 10:27 pm
Location: Merritt Island, Florida

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by Gregg »

Years ago I did make a formal suggestion as to naming CVN-77.
I suggested - USS Taxpayer.
I'm sure that suggestion never got anywhere :>))
Gregg
User avatar
ctangus
Posts: 2153
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:34 pm
Location: Boston, Mass.

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by ctangus »

ORIGINAL: Gregg

Years ago I did make a formal suggestion as to naming CVN-77.
I suggested - USS Taxpayer.
I'm sure that suggestion never got anywhere :>))
Gregg

Well, I'm sure that wouldn't get anywhere either. But I like it. [;)]
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by Ron Saueracker »

ORIGINAL: Ursa MAior

There is definitely somthing wrong with the names of US ships nowadays.

Check LCS Freedom AFAIK next is Independence. What comes after? LCS Democracy?

Someone is taking the names of soviet warships from the fifties.

Brave new world.

Scary but not surprising, these were the names of the black shuttles in the movie Armageddon!
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
LargeSlowTarget
Posts: 4900
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hessen, Germany - now living in France

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by LargeSlowTarget »

ORIGINAL: irrelevant

GHWB's major contribution to Naval Aviation was to validate the Lifeguard Submarine concept.

If you want to name one after a naval aviator (and what could possibly be more appropriate), how about USS Wade McCluskey?

LOL for the first remark.

Agree on the second, although McCluskey made a mistake at Midway which could have had serious consequences.

From the Pacific War Historical Society website:

Through his binoculars, McClusky could see that the three closest Japanese carriers were manoeuvring frantically to avoid an attack by American Navy torpedo bombers. The attacking aircraft were in fact Yorktown's Torpedo Squadron Three (VT-3). McClusky was amazed to find no Zeros barring their path to the Japanese carriers. There was not a moment to lose, and McClusky broke radio silence to assign targets. He assigned one carrier (Kaga) as his target and another (Akagi) to Lieutenant Richard H. "Dick" Best's Bombing Six. At 1022, McClusky pushed over his SBD and plunged like a vengeful thunderbolt on Kaga. Twenty-six of his SBDs followed him in the dive on Kaga.

[...]

Lieutenant Commander McClusky had breached dive-bombing doctrine by diving on Kaga instead of the more distant Akagi. As the trailing squadron, Lieutenant Dick Best's Bombing Six should have dived on Kaga. McClusky's Scouting Six, which was the leading squadron, should have flown further on and dived on Akagi. Dick Best did not receive McClusky's assignment of targets by radio, and followed doctrine by preparing to dive on Kaga. He was startled when McClusky and Scouting Six flashed past him in their own dive on Kaga. With commendable presence of mind, Best retrieved the potentially dangerous situation by closing his dive-flaps and signalling Bombing Six to follow him towards Akagi. It was too late! McClusky's error caused all of Bombing Six except Best's two wing men to follow McClusky and Scouting Six in their dive on Kaga. The seriousness of McClusky's error can only be fully appreciated when it is realised that it could have led all of the Enterprise SBDs to attack Kaga and leave the Japanese flagship Akagi untouched!


Other appropriate names would be Waldron, Leslie, Thach, O'Hare, McCampbell - also Marine Corps pilots like Foss, Bauer, Smith or Boyington - imagine a CVN called 'Pappy'. [:D]
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5185
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

How about the USS Political?

Post by Don Bowen »

The U.S. Navy used to have set naming conventions and a strict rule against naming ships for living individuals.   Carriers were named after battles or famous ships of the past, but exceptions began early - one named for a pioneer aviator killed in an accident, then two for presidents that died in office.  Not too bad...
 
But then a carrier was named for the head of the congressional committee that allocated military funds and the floodgates were open.   Now naming is purely political and a sorry shame.  At the very least to old "no living individual" requirement should remain.   With a decreasing number of ships and plenty of famous old ship names unused, there is little justification for naming larger ships after politicians (except politics, of course).  Add me to the list of forum members that decrys this trend.
 
 
fcooke
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 10:37 pm
Location: Boston, London, Hoboken, now Warwick, NY

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by fcooke »

There was a CVL named Independence in WW2 so I can deal with that name. The USS Constitution is still in existance and still in Commission so that name is unavailable. But I think there are available 'famous' names - like Hornet - that should be used.

When I first heard about the CVN Reagan I did a quick web search because I thought I had missed word of his passing. Turns out he was still alive (at the time) and the Navy had changed their practices.

Who has responsibility for the names - Navy or politicians?
User avatar
Przemcio231
Posts: 1901
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:39 am
Location: Warsaw,Poland,EU:)

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by Przemcio231 »

Funny Discusiom...

But a Dumb Question for what in the hell do you need another CV??[:D] Russian Fleet is rusting in its ports , China dose not have any significant naval force. And if you will want to intervene in places like N. Korea or Iran or any other country you will meet no oposition exept a coupple of rusted disel Romeo sub's[:D][:D][:D] or some small obsolate surface vesseles armed with obsolate weapon system's[:D]
Image

Pinky: Hey Brain what are we goeing to do this evening?
Brain: The Usual Pinky we will try to take over the World;)
anarchyintheuk
Posts: 3958
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 7:08 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by anarchyintheuk »

At this point they're pretty much just replacments for ones that are scrapped, er . . . turned in to eco-friendly environments. The number of cvs isn't increasing.
User avatar
tsimmonds
Posts: 5490
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 2:01 pm
Location: astride Mason and Dixon's Line

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by tsimmonds »

If WitP has a lesson, isn't it that life is better when you have carriers and the other guy does not?
Fear the kitten!
User avatar
wworld7
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 2:57 am
Location: The Nutmeg State

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by wworld7 »

ORIGINAL: fcooke

Who has responsibility for the names - Navy or politicians?

Let's see, the Navy works for the people, who are represented by their politicians.

So the answer would be for better or worse the politicians.

Flipper
Flipper
SireChaos
Posts: 710
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:11 pm
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by SireChaos »

ORIGINAL: fcooke

There was a CVL named Independence in WW2 so I can deal with that name. The USS Constitution is still in existance and still in Commission so that name is unavailable. But I think there are available 'famous' names - like Hornet - that should be used.

*snip*

Hornet and Wasp are currently some kind of amphibious "baby carrier", that is, LPD, LHD or LHA type ships. At first sight this would seem like a "demotion" for the name, until you realize that these ships are about as WW2 carriers. A lot of others of those ships are named after WW2 Pacific Theater battles (like USS Tarawa, USS Saipan and so on) and so have names that would into the "carrier name pool" as well.
fcooke
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 10:37 pm
Location: Boston, London, Hoboken, now Warwick, NY

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by fcooke »

Thanks for the response. I know about the Wasp but do you have a ref/link on the Hornet? I can't seem to find her.

thx,
Frank
User avatar
Mark VII
Posts: 1845
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 6:41 am
Location: Brentwood,TN

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by Mark VII »

Yes, very true. Especially when we have the large super carriers that no one else has![:D][:D][:D]
ORIGINAL: irrelevant

If WitP has a lesson, isn't it that life is better when you have carriers and the other guy does not?
Image
Ursa MAior
Posts: 1414
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:10 am
Location: Hungary, EU

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by Ursa MAior »

ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget
Other appropriate names would be Waldron, Leslie, Thach, O'Hare, McCampbell - also Marine Corps pilots like Foss, Bauer, Smith or Boyington - imagine a CVN called 'Pappy'. [:D]

Damned right. I dont know too much about sea or navy air men from the korean or vietnam war but it would be more appropiate to name a CV after say Henderson than a living person.

Oh BTW ther is a Bill Clinton Ave somewhere IIRC in Arkansas. Even in our hungarian half-democracy the person shoould be dead at least since 25 yrs before a street or whatever can be named after him.
Image
Art by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
dtravel
Posts: 4533
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:34 pm

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by dtravel »

ORIGINAL: Przemcio231

Funny Discusiom...

But a Dumb Question for what in the hell do you need another CV??[:D] Russian Fleet is rusting in its ports , China dose not have any significant naval force. And if you will want to intervene in places like N. Korea or Iran or any other country you will meet no oposition exept a coupple of rusted disel Romeo sub's[:D][:D][:D] or some small obsolate surface vesseles armed with obsolate weapon system's[:D]

Because carriers can operate anywhere there is deep water. They are not dependent on having some friendly country in the vicinity where the US has already built a military base. They are usable against just about any target, not just naval forces. A lot of the aircraft flying ground support in Afganistan and Iraq were carrier based.

The USN carrier battlegroup is the current pinnacle of gunboat diplomacy and power projection. If someone does something we really really don't like, we park one nearby. They tend to improve the hearing and friendliness of whoever we want to talk to just by being there. [;)]
This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.

Image
SireChaos
Posts: 710
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:11 pm
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by SireChaos »

ORIGINAL: fcooke

Thanks for the response. I know about the Wasp but do you have a ref/link on the Hornet? I can't seem to find her.

thx,
Frank

Nor can I, it seems. Apparently my memory was playing tricks with me. Wikipedia says the Essex class ship is the most recent Hornet. Besides the F/A-18, of course[;)]
Micah Goodman
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu May 23, 2002 5:35 am

RE: Slightly OT: Last of the Nimitz class CVs Christened

Post by Micah Goodman »

The problem with the way that the Navy names its ships is that it has changed from honoring ideas, Independence, ect. Or institutions, President, Congress, ect. Or even geographic areas of the county. Now it centers on appeasing US politicians. Now we have air craft carriers named John C Stennis! Suck up to the Navy and get a ship named after you. How pathetic. I would amend naming ships to not only dead people but if they are politicians they should be dead for at least 50 years. Look at how much animas this thread has kicked up over naming certain ships after recent politicians. It turns my stomach that the worst US President in History (IMHO anyway) has a submarine named after him. Submarines are now named after states. The USS Texas should always be at least a cruiser or something bigger, not a submarine. But I digress; the only way the current policy will go back to the way it was is if Congress makes it a law and not a policy. But politicians are too busy patting themselves on back at how wonderful they are and how they need to be honored by having their name put on a ship that will be around for fifty years. Give me a break.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”