Basic Unit Movement

Post discussions and advice on TOAW scenario design here.

Moderators: JAMiAM, ralphtricky

User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4167
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

RE: Basic Unit Movement

Post by golden delicious »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

As did his historical counterpart in O'Connor's Raid, Crusader, and El Alamein. It was a see-saw campaign.

The British efforts to out-German the Germans were notable for their lack of success. In fact the success at Alamein was in forcing the Germans to fight a set-peice battle, which destroyed their advantages.
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
User avatar
a white rabbit
Posts: 1180
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:11 pm
Location: ..under deconstruction..6N124E..

RE: Basic Unit Movement

Post by a white rabbit »

ORIGINAL: Szilard

ORIGINAL: Fungwu

"TOAW truck is a tool for changing the movement rate of the divisions. It's not one actual truck"

Huh? So divisions have phantom trucks that only exist in the 7th dimension? Man, you blew my mind.[X(]



It's true, though. You have to design the rest of the unit first, then add in just enough transport to give the "right" result.

Dunno why things were designed this way (something to do with behavior on the defense?), and I've never been sure how it squares with traffic congestion. Eg in a France 40 scenario I'd want German infantry divisions to be relatively clumsy formations on the move, with long road-clogging waggon trains, major obstacles to panzer formations if allowed to get in front of them. But I'm not sure if they will actually behave that way, if they're designed with just enough transports to give the right mobility.

Anyway, it's one of those things which should be talked about in the manual, but isn't. IIRC, it actually took quite a while before scenario designers twigged to it, back in the day.


..you could try Bioeding an infantry squad that needs transport and add that as part of the division, the additional porters/horses/trucks would add to the div size..
..toodA, irmAb moAs'lyB 'exper'mentin'..,..beàn'tus all..?,
ColinWright
Posts: 2604
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 6:28 pm

RE: Basic Unit Movement

Post by ColinWright »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: golden delicious
I have adjectives for Bob (intelligent, inventive, often mistaken, unbelievably stubborn). I wouldn't say they're names.

Translation: I disagree with Ben from time to time.

'Often mistaken,' 'unbelievably stubborn.' Somebody said that about you?

Nahh...you're the soul of compromise and conciliation. I should know: I can recognize a kindred spirit.
I am not Charlie Hebdo
User avatar
Sertorius1
Posts: 281
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 3:19 am
Location: Georgia, USA

RE: Basic Unit Movement

Post by Sertorius1 »

Congratulations, Bob.

I've developed a search system based on you. When it comes to certain functions pertaining to the editor that either aren't covered or are done so in a superficial way I simply type in the term and "Curtis LeMay" in the appropriate search engine boxes. This saves me time because the odds are heavily in my favor that you have written about what I'm looking for.
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 15357
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

RE: Basic Unit Movement

Post by Curtis Lemay »

ORIGINAL: Sertorius1

Congratulations, Bob.

I've developed a search system based on you. When it comes to certain functions pertaining to the editor that either aren't covered or are done so in a superficial way I simply type in the term and "Curtis LeMay" in the appropriate search engine boxes. This saves me time because the odds are heavily in my favor that you have written about what I'm looking for.

Glad to be of assistance. Would work if you were interested in Thermoslutular bombs, too.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”