But let the Allies start using their overabundance of B-17's and eveybody start's screaming for "House Rules".
Not all. Some people are happy for things to cut both ways...
Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami
 But let the Allies start using their overabundance of B-17's and eveybody start's screaming for "House Rules".
What - you don't like my squeaky voice?ORIGINAL: Gem35
Just don't wear your underpants so tight sometimes guys.[;)]

That's the point. There is no such thing as "gamey." If you don't want it to happen in the game, either persuade the devs to change it (and it may or may not happen for AE) or get together with your playing partner and impose house rules.ORIGINAL: John 3rd
I think it is gamey. ... Didn't happen in 1942...
ORIGINAL: John 3rd
I think it is gamey. I've dealt with it in one of my current campaigns. The Allies don't fly at bases where I have a lot of fighters because of the expected casualties so they attack at night with massed formations and drive me out that way. Didn't happen in 1942... And did you as the Japanese use your BB's for "bombardment missions" all over the Pacific? That didn't happen in 1942 either..., only a couple of BC's were ever given the mission.
The doctrine argument holds some validity here. The USAF was a 'precision daylight bombing tool.' It REALLY didn't work out that way but that it how it was designed. And the Japanese "battleline" was the "instrament of decision" to be conserved in home waters for "the Decisive Battle".
ORIGINAL: pasternakski
There are several terms that have emerged on these forums that I refuse to enter into my lexicon. "Gamey" is one of them.

[/center]
[/center]
ORIGINAL: pasternakski
"Oh! What will we tell the children!" - James T. "womanizer" Kirk
![]()
ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl
ORIGINAL: John 3rd
I think it is gamey. I've dealt with it in one of my current campaigns. The Allies don't fly at bases where I have a lot of fighters because of the expected casualties so they attack at night with massed formations and drive me out that way. Didn't happen in 1942... And did you as the Japanese use your BB's for "bombardment missions" all over the Pacific? That didn't happen in 1942 either..., only a couple of BC's were ever given the mission.
The doctrine argument holds some validity here. The USAF was a 'precision daylight bombing tool.' It REALLY didn't work out that way but that it how it was designed. And the Japanese "battleline" was the "instrament of decision" to be conserved in home waters for "the Decisive Battle".
Why is it only "gamey" when the Allies use an asset in an ahistoric manner?

[/center]ORIGINAL: pasternakski
"Oh! What will we tell the children!" - James T. "womanizer" Kirk
![]()

ORIGINAL: Anthropoid
Kirk was a Quaker compared to Captain Pike.
Pike really new how to pimp dee Orion beotches . . .