Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Nemo121
Posts: 5838
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 11:15 am
Contact:

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by Nemo121 »

But let the Allies start using their overabundance of B-17's and eveybody start's screaming for "House Rules".
 
Not all. Some people are happy for things to cut both ways...
John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.
User avatar
pasternakski
Posts: 5567
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 7:42 pm

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by pasternakski »

ORIGINAL: Gem35
Just don't wear your underpants so tight sometimes guys.[;)]
What - you don't like my squeaky voice?
Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17670
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by John 3rd »

I think it is gamey.  I've dealt with it in one of my current campaigns.  The Allies don't fly at bases where I have a lot of fighters because of the expected casualties so they attack at night with massed formations and drive me out that way.  Didn't happen in 1942...
 
The doctrine argument holds some validity here.  The USAF was a 'precision daylight bombing tool.'  It REALLY didn't work out that way but that it how it was designed. 
 
Anyone who reads my AARs know that I LOVE to split up the KB early in the war because that is how the Japanese did it.  Has it cost me?  Yes!  Do I still do it?  Yes!
 
My .02
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
pasternakski
Posts: 5567
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 7:42 pm

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by pasternakski »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

I think it is gamey. ... Didn't happen in 1942...
That's the point. There is no such thing as "gamey." If you don't want it to happen in the game, either persuade the devs to change it (and it may or may not happen for AE) or get together with your playing partner and impose house rules.

There are several terms that have emerged on these forums that I refuse to enter into my lexicon. "Gamey" is one of them. "Respawn" is another.

Gawd, how I hate even the sound of "respawn" when applied to a computer wargaming dynamic.
Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by Mike Scholl »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

I think it is gamey.  I've dealt with it in one of my current campaigns.  The Allies don't fly at bases where I have a lot of fighters because of the expected casualties so they attack at night with massed formations and drive me out that way.  Didn't happen in 1942... And did you as the Japanese use your BB's for "bombardment missions" all over the Pacific? That didn't happen in 1942 either..., only a couple of BC's were ever given the mission.

The doctrine argument holds some validity here.  The USAF was a 'precision daylight bombing tool.'  It REALLY didn't work out that way but that it how it was designed.  And the Japanese "battleline" was the "instrament of decision" to be conserved in home waters for "the Decisive Battle".

Why is it only "gamey" when the Allies use an asset in an ahistoric manner?
User avatar
treespider
Posts: 5781
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:34 am
Location: Edgewater, MD

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by treespider »

ORIGINAL: pasternakski



There are several terms that have emerged on these forums that I refuse to enter into my lexicon. "Gamey" is one of them.


Wait a second now....I've had some pretty gamey meat at times.
Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910
User avatar
pasternakski
Posts: 5567
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 7:42 pm

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by pasternakski »

I don't know ... tastes like chicken to me ...
Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.
User avatar
thegreatwent
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Denver, CO

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by thegreatwent »

Oh no! Don't engage Pasternakski in word games. He thrives off of them like Rejick in Star Trek's "Wolf in the Fold" Episode. Rejick feeds off fear, as P feeds off words. Just take a tranquilizer and disregard for best effect[:D].
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17670
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by John 3rd »

I ALWAYS appreciate any form of classical Star Trek reference!

...error...error...faulty...faulty....
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
Gem35
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by Gem35 »

Computer, compute to the last digit the value of pi.
working.....
It doesn't make any sense, Admiral. Were we better than the Japanese or just luckier?

[center]Image[/center]
[center]Banner By Feurer Krieg[/center]
User avatar
Gem35
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by Gem35 »

"The best diplomat that I know is a fully-loaded phaser bank." -- Lt. Cdr. Montgomery Scott
It doesn't make any sense, Admiral. Were we better than the Japanese or just luckier?

[center]Image[/center]
[center]Banner By Feurer Krieg[/center]
User avatar
pasternakski
Posts: 5567
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 7:42 pm

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by pasternakski »

"Oh! What will we tell the children!" - James T. "womanizer" Kirk


Image
Attachments
kinkykirk.jpg
kinkykirk.jpg (23.99 KiB) Viewed 183 times
Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.
Tophat1815
Posts: 1824
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 4:11 pm

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by Tophat1815 »

ORIGINAL: pasternakski

"Oh! What will we tell the children!" - James T. "womanizer" Kirk


Image


Your just jealous of Kirk! he had to pay dearly for those scenes with the babes in rather poor dialogue badly delivered.[:D]

As for it being "gamey"or not. As a Japanese player the Allied us of 4E DEATH(massed bombers at below 10,000ft)at night is pure excrement. The Allied players like to tell themselves the japanese have x,y and z ahistoric advantages so abuse of the 4E Death machine is perfectly legal. My advice find another pbem opponent! Harsh? Perhaps it is harsh,but WiTp is a "LONG" game and supposed to be fun correct? Ask yourself if you are enjoying yourself in 1942? By 1944 it'll be far,far tougher can you handle it?
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

I think it is gamey.  I've dealt with it in one of my current campaigns.  The Allies don't fly at bases where I have a lot of fighters because of the expected casualties so they attack at night with massed formations and drive me out that way.  Didn't happen in 1942... And did you as the Japanese use your BB's for "bombardment missions" all over the Pacific? That didn't happen in 1942 either..., only a couple of BC's were ever given the mission.

The doctrine argument holds some validity here.  The USAF was a 'precision daylight bombing tool.'  It REALLY didn't work out that way but that it how it was designed.  And the Japanese "battleline" was the "instrament of decision" to be conserved in home waters for "the Decisive Battle".

Why is it only "gamey" when the Allies use an asset in an ahistoric manner?


If the Japanese use 400 Sallies out of Rangoon to do daily night bombing attacks against Mandalay at 6000 ft then I would call it as gamey as if the Allied would do the same with 300 B-17 against Rangoon. Why should "gamey" be something side related? [&:]
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17670
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by John 3rd »

"I've been prepared for death ever since I murdered my crew."  Commodore Matt Decker  The Doomsday Machine This writer's favorite episode of Classical Star Trek.
 
I do agree that the game is a two-way street.  As a Japanese player I have very rarely used night bombing because it is so ineffective unless you bomb in large numbers from low altitude.  It is also far mroe effective with 4EB then with 2EB.
 
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9893
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by ny59giants »

Thanks for this thread. I'm going to do some in my PBEM game. It's nice having all those LB with a longer range in Empire's Ablaze.

Damian...are you listening??
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
n01487477
Posts: 4759
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 12:00 am

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by n01487477 »

I'd use profanity but don't want to turn into the "green" goblin ...

Michael, What's a man supposed to do but smile wryly and put his chin out ? ...

Wish you forum member would stop posting good topics and giving him ideas!
User avatar
Anthropoid
Posts: 3107
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Secret Underground Lair

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by Anthropoid »

ORIGINAL: pasternakski

"Oh! What will we tell the children!" - James T. "womanizer" Kirk


Image

Kirk was a Quaker compared to Captain Pike.

Pike really new how to pimp dee Orion beotches . . .
The x-ray is her siren song. My ship cannot resist her long. Nearer to my deadly goal. Until the black hole. Gains control...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIIlkyZ ... playnext=3
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17670
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by John 3rd »

Nothing like a green-coloured slave girl!
 
Damian--you have my profound apologies since I NEVER want to help Michael out!  [:D][8D][:D]
 
"This unit cannot murder." 
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Is 4e night bombing gamey?

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: Anthropoid


Kirk was a Quaker compared to Captain Pike.

Pike really new how to pimp dee Orion beotches . . .

Captain Archer is no slouch either. Plenty of testosterone. [:D]

Kirk rocks.........its like Prince vs. Michael......Prince won by default because he retained his sanity. Kirk won by default because they beefed up Picard in the latter NG movies so that he acted more "Kirk-ish"

[:D]


Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”