The Imperial War Museum London

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

Joram
Posts: 3206
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 5:40 am

RE: The Imperial War Museum London

Post by Joram »

I enjoyed the museum and even though most these pics are WW2 they have a lot of items or at least presentations stretching back from the late 1800s I believe.  
 
The Holocaust exhibit was very well done but a bit of a tear jerker even for someone like me who's actually visited Dachau.  Had to go out and unwind after seeing it!
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: The Imperial War Museum London

Post by Capt. Harlock »

The guns are the famous 15", the finest naval gun Britain ever produced. They entered service with the Queen Elizabeth class, and armed many others not least the Hood and our last battleship - the superb Vanguard.

The 15" were good guns, but for my money the 14" on the King George V class were even better. (Higher muzzle velocity and greater penetration.) And don't forget the 16" models on the Nelson and Rodney -- those are the lads that did the heavy lifting in pounding the Bismarck to a wreck.
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
Ironclad
Posts: 1936
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:35 pm

RE: The Imperial War Museum London

Post by Ironclad »

No, I hadn't overlooked the others. The 15" was a class act from the start and had great accuracy. The 16" was a more natural progression than the sometimes temperamental 14" which the RN had to compromise on given the design restrictions in the lead up to war. All these weapons had great destructive power when they were on target but its worth noting that Bismarck was still afloat (although wrecked) after numerous hits, many at exceptionally close range.

Of course the true successor of the 15" was Fisher's projected 18" but we will never know whether it would have been as successful a design (doubts have been raised about its likely efficacy). The Japanese managed to introduce a working 18" whereas the USA opted for improvements through their super heavy 16" shells and better fire-control; probabably the more cost-effective approach.
JamesM
Posts: 1026
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: QLD, Australia

RE: The Imperial War Museum London

Post by JamesM »

Thank you for the photos JD
IronDuke_slith
Posts: 1385
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

RE: The Imperial War Museum London

Post by IronDuke_slith »

ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd

And to all who thanked me for showing, it was my pleasure. I had a great day out...truly awesome. We were there for about 5 hours. Free of charge too!

Couldn't help but put a deep sea diver in the collection box though.

Have you seen the Tank Museum at Bovington?

If you haven't, I'd recommend it. Far more vehicles, although obviously less on everything else. I spent 6 hours grinning like a five year old at the Cadbury's factory. Tiger, Panther, they had everything.

Regards,
ID
User avatar
JudgeDredd
Posts: 8362
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 7:28 pm
Location: Scotland

RE: The Imperial War Museum London

Post by JudgeDredd »

Yes I have. I enjoyed it thoroughly, though it needs another visit, because that was quite a few years ago. I remember the Tiger well....beautiful tank! Panther is a looker as well, but I honestly can't remember it there. We were on our way back from holiday in Wales, so we didn't have a great deal of time.
Alba gu' brath
Ironclad
Posts: 1936
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:35 pm

RE: The Imperial War Museum London

Post by Ironclad »

Thanks JD. Good set of photos - that jagdpanther is still a deadly looking beast.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”