v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

thewood1
Posts: 10070
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Boston

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by thewood1 »

So I am dense...does the accel setting matter at all. I am not sure what each stage of accel means in non-impulse.
User avatar
dandin384
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:17 pm
Location: United States

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by dandin384 »

ORIGINAL: thewood1

So I am dense...does the accel setting matter at all. I am not sure what each stage of accel means in non-impulse.

With pulse mode and hi-fi off this is what is going on...
1:1 - 1 tick = 1 second
1:5 - 1 tick = 5 seconds
1:15 - 1 tick = 15 seconds

That goes all the way up to 1 tick = 30 minutes. Hi-fi changes 1:1 from a tick every second to multiple ticks per second.

If you try to play a large scenario on 1:60 or 1:300 things tend to slow down a bit because a lot more stuff is going on under the hood per tick. The pulse mode makes it easier to run your game at higher time acceleration factors.
thewood1
Posts: 10070
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Boston

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by thewood1 »

"That goes all the way up to 1 tick = 30 minutes. Hi-fi changes 1:1 from a tick every second to multiple ticks per second. "

This is the part...how much does each change in the level of accel in the drop down effect the actual time in the game.

btw, I have played the game since release...I know how the standard accel works. That is why I explicitly stated non-pulse.
NickD
Posts: 163
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 8:47 pm

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by NickD »

Excellent update - thanks a lot.

Out of interest, where are you heading for by including the World War II-era platforms? Is the plan to flesh this out into a full World War II/pre-1945 database?
User avatar
dandin384
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:17 pm
Location: United States

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by dandin384 »

ORIGINAL: thewood1

This is the part...how much does each change in the level of accel in the drop down effect the actual time in the game.

Well the normal acceleration factors are already there, and that's based off one tick a second. The devs tell us:

"Enabling this option leads to two changes:
* At any time acceleration setting, the map & UI do not refresh every second but every 0.1 sec.
* The sim engine executes each turn not in "pulsing" mode (to emulate Harpoon's presentation), but as fast as possible."

So instead of a once a second it's ten times a second, so 10x the time factor. At least that's the way I see it. I'm fully aware that I may be wrong though, one of the devs will have to confirm this [:)]
thewood1
Posts: 10070
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Boston

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by thewood1 »

OK, while I appreciate your trying to help...telling me how the previous system works and repeating what the devs have already said isn't getting me anywhere. I have been hoping to hear something official.
ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by ComDev »

ORIGINAL: Barny

Hi mikmyk
One Country from 1971 -Abu Dhabi can be deleted from DB3000
Abu Dhabi and UAE both have ships. aircraft, facilities and weapons in
DB3000 (funny not identical)
Barny

Thanks, wil fix that [8D]
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by ComDev »

Have created a new ticket on the u-boats and assigned to Paul [8D]

Will have a new look at the Su-7 as well when time permitts.

The F-16 and F/A-18 single and two-seaters habe identical range for the sake of simplicity.
ORIGINAL: rafale

Thanks for so big update
I checked few new things and have questions:

U-boat type 7c:

surface:

CMANO DATA
creep 5kts - time/range: 1m 2d
cruise 8kts - time/range: 1m 2d - why the same in different speed???
full 15kts - time/range: 15w 1d - impossible

should be: cruise speed 10kts - time/range: 1m 6d (because 8850nmi@10kts)
max speed 17kts - time/range: 8d 11h (because 3450nmi@17kts)

submerged:

CMANO DATA
creep 3kts - time/range: 1d 2h
cruise 6kts - time/range: 6h 40min

I found 4kts@80nmi and 2kts@120nmi, it gives
creep 2kts - time/range: 2d 12h
cruise 4kts - time/range: 20h


U-boat type 9b:

surface:

CMANO DATA
creep 3kts - time/range: 1m 2d
cruise 5kts - time/range: 1m 2d - why "oceanic" 9B has lower travel speeds than "coastal" 7C???
full 9kts - time/range: 3w 5d - why 9kts is the max speed for 9B??? how can I pursuit cargo ships and tankers??? max speed for 9B is 18kts

should be: cruise speed 10kts - time/range: 1m 20d (because 12000nmi@10kts)
cruise speed 12kts - time/range: 1m 5h (because 8700nmi@12kts)
max speed 18kts - time/range: 8d 11h (because 3800nmi@18kts)

submerged:

CMANO DATA
creep 3kts - time/range: 1d 2h - why the same as 7C???
cruise 6kts - time/range: 6h 40min - why the same as 7C???

I found 4kts@80nmi, it gives
cruise 4kts - time/range: 16h


and
U-boat type XXI:

surface:

CMANO DATA
creep 2kts - time/range: 1m 2d
cruise 5kts - time/range: 1m 2d - why "oceanic" XXI has lower travel speeds than "coastal" 7C???
full 10kts - time/range: 3w 5d - why 10kts is the max speed for XXI??? how can I pursuit cargo ships and tankers??? max speed for XXI is 15kts

should be: cruise speed 10kts - time/range: 2m 4d 14h (because 15500nmi@10kts)
cruise speed 12kts - time/range: 1m 10d 2h (because 11500nmi@12kts)


submerged:

CMANO DATA
creep 2kts - time/range: 1w
cruise 5kts - time/range: 8h 40min - with this speed XXI could go nearly 3 days (340nmi) not few hours !!!
full 10kts - time/range: 2h 30min
flank 13kts - time/range: 1h

I found this:
4kts 420nmi
5kts 340nmi
6kts 280nmi
10kts 110nmi
12kts 60nmi
15kts 30nmi
17kts 11nmi, it gives:

creep 4kts - time/range: 4d 8h
cruise 6kts - time/range: 2d
full 10kts - time/range: 11h
flank 17kts - time/range: 40min

thanks for everyone who reed all above, I will be very happy if some u-boats data will be corrected in future

PS: still have hope some days Su-7 will be corrected as I wrote before
*400liter for ferry - why??? 600 or 950 only
*su-7b and 6xfab-100 - su-7b NEVER had 6 hardpoints, only su-7bkl and later also on older su-7bm/bmk
*F-16C and D the same ferry range and fuel capacity - how its possible?
*F/A-18C and D the same ferry range and fuel capacity - how its possible?

thanks to all for keeping CMANO up to date, its hard work but I never seen before so good and fast customer service

if you will found
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
Dimitris
Posts: 15289
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:29 am
Contact:

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by Dimitris »

Build 498 - v1.03 Release Candidate 2
--------------------------------------------------------

Download here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B205vp ... sp=sharing

This can be applied to any existing Command installation.

Release Notes (changes since B497)

Fixed/Added:
-----------------
- 0006903: Illumination radars/laser fail to illuminate targets for LGM
- 0006902: Illumination radars/laser fail to illuminate targets for SARH missiles
- 0006891: Need (0/10000) weapons record for KD-20
- 0006500: Japanese F-4 Phantoms
- 0006444: DB3k: Italian Navy fixes
- 0006443: DB3k Update: Ground Master 400/406 series
- 0006436: Su-34 loadout mods
- 0006383: MALD range
- 0006362: SAM Adjustment
- 0006264: CV 90 AP ammo
- 0006246: Russian BMEWS assets update
- 0006512: N-001V Mech vs. APG-63 (R-27RE)
- 0006532: DB3K Update: #135 F-4 Phantom II [Kurnass 2000] Fixes
- 0006633: DB3k Update: Polish Radars
- 0006890: KD-88 Can't hit land targets
- 0006885: ISCB-1 mine cluster bomb
- 0006869: SA-24 marked as rear-aspect
- 0006867: DB3k: South African Aircraft Adds
- 0006779: DB3k: Add RQ-21A Blackjack small UAV
- 0006689: DB3k Update: Sonar on second block of Chinese Type 056
- 0006681: S-13 rocket variants
- 0006680: S-8 rocket variants
- 0006183: F125 German Frigate
- 0006058: SA-15 Tor M2 Upgrade
- 0004266: Iskander update
- 0004345: Soviet/Russian ground radars update
- 0004510: Add HMS Carlskrona
- 0005193: DB3k: Add Thai and South African Gripens
- 0005437: Spanish Dedalo and Cobras
- 0005524: 42S6 Morfey SR-SAM
- 0006884: HADES CBU
- 0005951: DB3k Update: AW159 Super Lynx
- 0005716: Add Cypriot SA-11b and SA-15b
- 0005659: Swedish HMS Belos, HMS Pelikanen
- 0000923: Boeing ScanEagle
- 0003241: DB3K: Tor M2 (SA-15D)
- 0003589: DB3K: Voronezh-DM BMEWS radar
- 0003447: DB3K: ISCB-1 cluster mine
- 0003588: DB3K: Voronezh-VP BMEWS radar
- 0002993: DB3K: Vostok-E EW/GCI radar
- 0003620: Add tech gen to anti-mine sonars and hunt/sweep equipment
- 0003697: DB3K: Chinese LCAC
- 0003959: J 35F loadouts
- 0004167: Sweden orders IRIS-T SLS
- 0004204: IRIS-T SLS SAM
- 0006209: Sat orbit problem

* Includes the v408 versions of the DB3000 & CWDB databases.

* Includes rebuilt & updated versions of all official scenarios.


User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12459
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by Sardaukar »

Do you guys ever sleep or eat? [:D]
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
thewood1
Posts: 10070
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Boston

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by thewood1 »

Thanks...was about to reload 490...good timing.
Vici Supreme
Posts: 568
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:06 pm
Location: Southern Germany

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by Vici Supreme »

Thanks a lot! [:)]
Ginetto
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 2:34 pm

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by Ginetto »

If I want to download and install v. 1.03 Candidate 2, do I have to first do the same with candidate 1? Or can I just skip it?
[8|]
Gino
RoryAndersonCDT
Posts: 1828
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:45 pm

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by RoryAndersonCDT »

This can be applied to any existing Command installation.
Command Dev Team
Technical Lead
Vici Supreme
Posts: 568
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:06 pm
Location: Southern Germany

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by Vici Supreme »

appreciating the F125 frigate add! [;)]
User avatar
.Sirius
Posts: 712
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:21 pm
Contact:

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by .Sirius »

Whats Sleep[8D]
ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

Do you guys ever sleep or eat? [:D]
Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law
User avatar
.Sirius
Posts: 712
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:21 pm
Contact:

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by .Sirius »

who knows
Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law
guanotwozero
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:53 am

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by guanotwozero »

So, you devs are hooked up to coffee drip feeds?

Coffeeeeee...
rjm51973
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:41 pm
Location: Cabot, AR

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by rjm51973 »

Amazing! Thanks guys!
magi
Posts: 1533
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:06 am

RE: v1.03 Release Candidate thread

Post by magi »

this is what i get when i try to install....... and i really want it....
Attachments
errormessage.jpg
errormessage.jpg (517.08 KiB) Viewed 275 times
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”