ORIGINAL: witpqs
You are selling Warspite short, I think: it would have been Boobs, Boobs, and Boobs.ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
We knew the title had a classy origin. If you were Warspite or Chickenboy it would've been "Beans, Bullets and Boobs."
[:D]
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
ORIGINAL: witpqs
You are selling Warspite short, I think: it would have been Boobs, Boobs, and Boobs.ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
We knew the title had a classy origin. If you were Warspite or Chickenboy it would've been "Beans, Bullets and Boobs."
ORIGINAL: obvert
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
ORIGINAL: obvert
Huh?
Where?
The style guide my school uses has done away with the serial, or "Oxford" comma. If I don't use them that is why. Also, I think they'll eventually be phased out everywhere. [;)]
In your thread title.
I don't think they'll ever go away. They're absolutely necessary for clarity in lists at times. There's the famous example of:
We invited the hookers, Stalin and JFK.
vs.
We invited the hookers, Stalin, and JFK.
If it's an unclear order, just re-order and it becomes clear.
We invited Stalin, JFK and the hookers.
Is there confusion about the listing in the title of the thread? [:D]
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
ORIGINAL: obvert
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
In your thread title.
I don't think they'll ever go away. They're absolutely necessary for clarity in lists at times. There's the famous example of:
We invited the hookers, Stalin and JFK.
vs.
We invited the hookers, Stalin, and JFK.
If it's an unclear order, just re-order and it becomes clear.
We invited Stalin, JFK and the hookers.
Is there confusion about the listing in the title of the thread? [:D]
Well, you should also be listed first.
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
You're title is better than my feeble effort of years ago, Eric. In a tortured nod to logistics, I titled my AAR vs. PanzerjagerHortlund: "War and Peas."
ORIGINAL: obvert
The title is from the book. Although the original uses a serial comma. [;)]
There is a full copy on biblio I just found. I paid for it on Kindle, which is not bad at about £ 3.50, but the hardback is listed anywhere form £80-200! [X(]
https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/BBBO/
I like reading a book about naval logistics in the Pacific War written by the admiral who actually ran Fleet logistics from 43-45. [:)]
ORIGINAL: witpqs
You are selling Warspite short, I think: it would have been Boobs, Boobs, and Boobs.ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
We knew the title had a classy origin. If you were Warspite or Chickenboy it would've been "Beans, Bullets and Boobs."

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
ORIGINAL: obvert
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
You're missing an Oxford comma.
Huh?
Where?
The style guide my school uses has done away with the serial, or "Oxford" comma. If I don't use them that is why. Also, I think they'll eventually be phased out everywhere. [;)]
In your thread title.
I don't think they'll ever go away. They're absolutely necessary for clarity in lists at times. There's the famous example of:
We invited the hookers, Stalin and JFK.
vs.
We invited the hookers, Stalin, and JFK.

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
We knew the title had a classy origin. If you were Warspite or Chickenboy it would've been "Beans, Bullets and Boobs."

ORIGINAL: Rafid
ORIGINAL: obvert
The title is from the book. Although the original uses a serial comma. [;)]
There is a full copy on biblio I just found. I paid for it on Kindle, which is not bad at about £ 3.50, but the hardback is listed anywhere form £80-200! [X(]
https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/BBBO/
I like reading a book about naval logistics in the Pacific War written by the admiral who actually ran Fleet logistics from 43-45. [:)]
I started reading it on biblio, and it sounds interesting - thanks a lot for the link and recommendation.
Could you please tell me, if the Kindle version has the same amount of typios (or OCR errors), because just the start of the Biblio was plagued by quite a few. Thanks again!
ORIGINAL: obvert
My English friend Chris hates it when I say British English. [:D]
ORIGINAL: Xargun
ORIGINAL: obvert
My English friend Chris hates it when I say British English. [:D]
I work with a couple Brits and they always say American English or the Queen's English. Always makes me smile.

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
On the comma issue, I see it both ways in the USA, though increasingly the comma is dropped.
I prefer using the comma. In my editing work for the magazine, I insert it when editing the stories of others.
I don't know what the AP style book says, but I agree with the Confederate private who was told that there was no such word as "cooter" in Webster's Dictionary. His reply: "I have as much right to make a dictionary as Mr. Webster."

ORIGINAL: obvert
We just had a survey form the yearbook team at school. No idea what any of the new slang was about. At all. [&:]
![]()
[/center]Hrm, do you not get those? And here I thought we were the same age-ish.ORIGINAL: obvert
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
On the comma issue, I see it both ways in the USA, though increasingly the comma is dropped.
I prefer using the comma. In my editing work for the magazine, I insert it when editing the stories of others.
I don't know what the AP style book says, but I agree with the Confederate private who was told that there was no such word as "cooter" in Webster's Dictionary. His reply: "I have as much right to make a dictionary as Mr. Webster."
Language is a continual evolution. It's never static. The "rules" are made by the next generation, and right now some of their completely stumps me.
We just had a survey form the yearbook team at school. No idea what any of the new slang was about. At all. [&:]
![]()