Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

With an average recon skill of 19, the Chinese bomber pilots did a great job of gathering intel over Shanghai.



Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (423.79 KiB) Viewed 912 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

The Queen is going to Panama Canal, and from there to East Coast USA...and will make off map runs to Cape Town. I wonder what her transit times will be?

Edit, rethinking this, with the Grace Liners and the Matson Liners heading for East Coast from San Diego and LA...she probably isn't needed there...but rather for a quick run to San Diego and back to Oz. Or I could send her to Cape Town...

Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (258.05 KiB) Viewed 912 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Japan could go Australia or India....

I have to revisit Babes website and relearn what a Pioneer squad does...





Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (324.91 KiB) Viewed 912 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

What to do with Clemsons?

My basic instinct is to form 8 size 3 or 6 size 4 Destroyer Squadrons. They pack a nice torpedo spread...aren't really good with CVs.

Or to eventually put six of them with a slow battleship. Since I have all my slow battleships, the demand for destroyers will be really high come 1943.

There is basically 0 chance Japan pulls some stupid west coast stunt, but you still have to cover your bases.[;)] Destroyers and local minesweepers will aid in detecting any task forces coming in and will give time for the CD guns to respond better.





Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (381.84 KiB) Viewed 912 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Rather than get both battlewagons finished quickly, we are going to concentrate on Warspite. Colorado just goes into refit for radar anyhow...

Warspite will be able to form up with some American destroyers and forma a strong stand off force near Midway/Wake.

Since the KB is at Singers, we will will focus on holding Wake...won't bother with Marcus this game as that pony is out...but perhaps a Kurile expedition before runways are built up? I bet Japan puts an HQa on Hokkaido asap.[:(] It would be nice to get some strategic vp early...but is it doable?







Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (89.94 KiB) Viewed 912 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18251
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

Everything is doable, you just have to figure out how.

I like to use the 4 pipers converted to APDs. They can make a decent Fast Transport, or haul supplies for an invasion convoy. Their ASW value goes up to 6 earlier than other US escorts.

Without looking things up, I do believe that the USMC Pioneers are like combat engineers but I don't know if they work construction.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20410
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

In stock games, Pioneer Bns are engineers with some AV and AA and a little support. They are not all combat engineers - the AV comes from embedded infantry too.

Image
Attachments
Pioneer Bn.jpg
Pioneer Bn.jpg (84.8 KiB) Viewed 912 times
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20410
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Rather than get both battlewagons finished quickly, we are going to concentrate on Warspite. Colorado just goes into refit for radar anyhow...

Warspite will be able to form up with some American destroyers and forma a strong stand off force near Midway/Wake.

Since the KB is at Singers, we will will focus on holding Wake...won't bother with Marcus this game as that pony is out...but perhaps a Kurile expedition before runways are built up? I bet Japan puts an HQa on Hokkaido asap.[:(] It would be nice to get some strategic vp early...but is it doable?


Image

I thought ships undergoing refit/upgrade could not accelerate repairs under any circumstances? In that case. leaving both BBs on normal repairs would be the best option.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


I thought ships undergoing refit/upgrade could not accelerate repairs under any circumstances? In that case. leaving both BBs on normal repairs would be the best option.

These two girls are being repaired now...you can get both of them repaired in under 30 days by jiggering with the settings...but I want Warspite out there.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Everything is doable, you just have to figure out how.

I like to use the 4 pipers converted to APDs. They can make a decent Fast Transport, or haul supplies for an invasion convoy. Their ASW value goes up to 6 earlier than other US escorts.

Without looking things up, I do believe that the USMC Pioneers are like combat engineers but I don't know if they work construction.

Not going to convert them to APDs. Ever.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Just a ton of free engineers at start...plus lots more naval squads than stock, it seems to me...



Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (145.05 KiB) Viewed 903 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18251
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

In stock games, Pioneer Bns are engineers with some AV and AA and a little support. They are not all combat engineers - the AV comes from embedded infantry too.

Image

Those are Australian units, he is referring to US Marine Pioneer units.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20410
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

In stock games, Pioneer Bns are engineers with some AV and AA and a little support. They are not all combat engineers - the AV comes from embedded infantry too.

Image

Those are Australian units, he is referring to US Marine Pioneer units.
I don't recall ever having seen a US Pioneer unit, so I said what I have seen. So many wrinkles in this mod!
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

lots on engineers at start?
wait until you reach early 43... I don't know what too do with so many construction LCUs!!
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

We need to get AD's and AE's and AGPs here to rearm CLs and DDs and PT boats. Disbanding the PT boats at Pearl will give us a jump start as soon as they cycle thru.

Usually Japan has a tough time getting troops here quickly, and normally it is Naval Guard type units. We might have a chance at defending Rabaul with small ships and perhaps cause Japan to fall off their timetable a bit during the amphibious phase.

The sad fact is that Japan pretty much can go anywhere and take anything...so real care needs to be exercised at what the Allies are willing to use to throw the Japanese off their game early.

The Louisville is too large, but is the only ship close so she has to go...but hopefully she will be replaced by hordes of destroyers and a few light cruisers.

There are four squadrons of 18 Kingfishers that arrive quickly this month...one is already here at LA. They will be set to naval attack low, and will be sent here. They can fly from dot bases and really savage shipping that has no fighter cover. I know that most AFBs use them for training, but PDU off, screw that.[:'(]



Image
Attachments
animated armor image.jpg
animated armor image.jpg (546.85 KiB) Viewed 903 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

I don't recall ever having seen a US Pioneer unit, so I said what I have seen. So many wrinkles in this mod!


Pioneer Squads...they seem to add to shore party strength too, which is loading and unloading I think. Plus combat (18 soft, no anti armor).




Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (99.38 KiB) Viewed 903 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

lots on engineers at start?
wait until you reach early 43... I don't know what too do with so many construction LCUs!!

I have heard tell of 2000+ engineers on a base[X(]
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Only now looking at the SRA...missed these guys from the replay.

Deep SRA invasion...

Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (224.91 KiB) Viewed 903 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

What sank:



Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (119.84 KiB) Viewed 903 times
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10623
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


I thought ships undergoing refit/upgrade could not accelerate repairs under any circumstances? In that case. leaving both BBs on normal repairs would be the best option.

These two girls are being repaired now...you can get both of them repaired in under 30 days by jiggering with the settings...but I want Warspite out there.
The Colorado still goes into upgrade at the end of the 30 days ... unless you want to use her without the radar upgrade...
Pax
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”