Bug Reports and Enhancement Requests

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Music

Post by Mr.Frag »

IN GAME MUSIC

Is it possible to add a few more songs in the mix ? (If your familiar with Age of Wonders at all, the music selection they had was really nice).

Why not just run your mp3 player? The sounds mix perfectly well. Mute the music in the game, quiet down the effects and let your songs play.
User avatar
Odin
Posts: 1045
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Germany, Wanne-Eickel

RE: Music

Post by Odin »

GLOBAL Aircraft management.

I want to edit mission parameters for ALL aircraft of one type with ONE action, i dont like to switch from base to base and tell every single divebomber group to attack from 16.000 feet.[:-]

It will save me a good amount of time.[8D]
Image
User avatar
Apollo11
Posts: 25253
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

Aircraft replacements...

Post by Apollo11 »

Hi all,

Here is idea from "Nikademus" about fixing aircraft replacements... I don't want that it gets lost... [;)]
ORIGINAL: Nikademus

I was against player controlled production, unless it was a toggable option. The BTR comments only cemented my reasons behind it. Players will inevitably do the same thing with it. They will cancel the medicore or bad designs and focus exclusively (within reasons and player tested strategies) on the better aircraft ultimately creating uniform (and ahistorical) airforces. Germans will have masses of FW-190's, US will dispense with P-39 and P-40 in favor of P-38, F6F goes in favor of F4U. etc etc.

Now that i've posted enough to be flamed. Recall that i "did" say, i was against player controlled production unless it was a toggable option. Problem solved. Those who wish to fiddle, fiddle, those who dont...dont.

My idea, nay "solution" for all the ruckas regarding upgrades/downgrades was a simple restrictive system.

Japan: IJN groups can only upgrade/downgrade to IJN aircraft
IJA groups can only upgrade/downgrade to IJA aircraft

Further restrictions:

Fighter groups can only change to other types of fighter groups/Fighter-bombers
Bomber groups can only chage to other types of bomber groups.
(further: LBA to LBA only......Dive bomber to Dive bomber only, Torpedo bomber to torpedo bomber only)


Leo "Apollo11"
Image

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE
User avatar
ogrv643
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:02 am

RE: Database

Post by ogrv643 »

An easier way to determen how much cargo space you need in a TF to transport one or more LCU's? [:(]
"The difference between a good and great officer is about ten seconds."
- Admiral Arleigh Burke
User avatar
Apollo11
Posts: 25253
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

Idea how to slow building speed down (ENG units limit)...

Post by Apollo11 »

Hi all,

IMHO, in WitP (same as in UV) players can do various things that are ahistorical and/or were practically impossible to do in WWII...

One such thing that bothers me much is speed of building up the bases (airbase/port) and fortifications because players can stack enormous number of ENG units into one HEX and, practically, build overnight.


So... to counter that I thought of very simple but effective solution!


Leo's suggestion of how to slow building speed down by limiting ENG unit stacking

Every HEX has SPS (Standard Potential Size) limiters (for both port and airbase size).

So... let's use combined numbers of SPS (for port and airbase size) as variable to limit the number of ENG squads able to work at one HEX at same time (note that single ENG vehicle represents 5 squads)!

Since SPS anyway means size we can elegantly use it to depict room available for ENG units to work!

I am sure that proper and well balanced formula can be devised for this to reflect historical building times and capabilities.


Privisory Example

Let's say there is HEX with "dot" (i.e. it is currently undeveloped with both port and airbase size of 0).

That HEX has SPS for port of 0 (meaning that biggest port build can be 3) and SPS for airbase of 2 (meaning that biggest airbase build can be 5).

This means that our limiting variable is 0 + 2 = 2 for that HEX.

If we agree that formula (purely speculative at this point since proper formula must be thought of carefully) means 30 ENG squads per variable this means that MAX number of ENG squads able to work at that HEX is 2 x 30 = 60 and that any excess of ENG units would not speed up the building at all because there simple isn't room for them to work!


And here is how "Nikademus" though this would be easier to accomplih (I agree with him 100%):
ORIGINAL: Nikademus

The issue is that a player can stack an infinate # of ENG units at a single base in order to ultra-accelerate base building. A similar comparison would be players who might try to create 100 ship air combat TF's in order to create so high a flak rating as to make them invulnerable to air attack (and this could be done in PacWar up to the size limit of the TF's)

WitP of course fixed that scenerio by introducing a "diminishing returns" rule for total AA. From the 16th ship onward, the AA value increase becomes less than the full stated value of the ship's AA component and so on and so on.

The suggestion is that a similar rule be applied to ENG units in that once a certain # of "engineers" is reached that they produce increasingly diminishing returns the higher above that # is reached. Players can still stack, they just wont get total value out of all those hundreds of diggers and their D8's


Leo "Apollo11"
Image

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE
Rainerle
Posts: 463
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 11:52 am
Location: Burghausen/Bavaria
Contact:

RE: Idea how to slow building speed down (ENG units limit)...

Post by Rainerle »

hi,
I seem to have noticed that the: 'Set all (aircraft name) in this TF'
and the: 'Set all (aircraft type) in this TF' still don't seem to work !
Since UV got me to use those extensively I miss them.

The 'Set ... at base' seem to work well !

Respectfully

PS: Please fix the load cost calculations you can botch games with this !
Image
Image brought to you by courtesy of Subchaser!
User avatar
BartM
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 10:17 pm
Contact:

RE: Idea how to slow building speed down (ENG units limit)...

Post by BartM »

quote:

IN GAME MUSIC

Is it possible to add a few more songs in the mix ? (If your familiar with Age of Wonders at all, the music selection they had was really nice).

Why not just run your mp3 player? The sounds mix perfectly well. Mute the music in the game, quiet down the effects and let your songs play.

True, except with the problems of the past and 3rd party players, Im a little timid to add anything like that, my hearing isn't the best, so I don't strive to get the BEST players, windows media does fine hehe

but ya, can do that too, [:D]
User avatar
BartM
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 10:17 pm
Contact:

general comment

Post by BartM »

Great Idea Pad !

color coding would make things really organized, where to move what
Wooglin
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:50 pm

MAIN MAP

Post by Wooglin »

MAIN MAP

Toggle display air cover. Along the same lines as for the air superiority value displayed in the base information box, this would show the maximum patrol radius of all planes capable of Naval Search. Jap radius in red, Allied radius in blue. Only known opponent planes would have their patrol radius displayed.
UncleBuck
Posts: 633
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 8:35 pm
Location: San Diego, CA, USA

RE: MAIN MAP

Post by UncleBuck »

Set All of a Plane type to Mission woudl be great. I hate having to go to all of my Naval bobmers and tell them not to bomb that useless JP base that they sail by. I am not interested in pounding the Island base, I want them to only hunt for ships or rest. HTe times I want to attack a Land base with Naval aviation I can set them for it.

I woudl liekto see specialization. It was mentioned earlier. I woudl love to see teh ability to actually make up Black Cats. As it is now, they need exp. at 75 I beleive. I would also like to see a modification to morale loss when doign low level attacks on shippig. If you do a skip bomb attack on some transports with B-25's and take a few damaged planes but sink 6 Transports you should not lose Moral points.

UB
Image
Buck Beach
Posts: 1974
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Upland,CA,USA

AI improvement

Post by Buck Beach »

I know there's a snowballs chance in hell but what the hey. I play the Allied side against the AI.

Would like an AI that doesn't send it's TFs into an obvious enemy meat grinder air coverage. Example a Jap. supply and AP TF within easy reach of Singapore Torpedo Bombers without trying to neutralize the air base first or any supply and troop pickup/delievery convoys steaming through the middle of enemy teritorry.

Seriousily. can't the game be programed to recon such bases and attack in mass before sending these TFs to slaughter or recognize a route's obvious dangers. Maybe some sort of application that has a similiar response as a Human Controlled TF in a Retirement Permissible mode on to avoid spotted enemy carrier TFs or within reach of enemy air bases.
User avatar
bstarr
Posts: 881
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 8:45 pm
Location: Texas, by God!

More numbers!

Post by bstarr »

I'm a statistic nut. Would it be possible to have a page that gives a total of what has been lost in ground combat throughout the game. There's a listing for air and naval loses, but no such listing for the poor men in the foxholes.

. . . and remember, numbers are your friends. [:)]

(ps. that was supposed to be in reply to Kid. Sorry, I'm fairly new to this online computer thing. In fact, I just now officially put away my dice and cardboard counters. [:)] )

User avatar
bstarr
Posts: 881
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 8:45 pm
Location: Texas, by God!

'nuther idear

Post by bstarr »

a warning marker letting you know if a factory did or did not produce anything the day before.

Xargun
Posts: 4396
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:34 pm
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

Truk Question

Post by Xargun »

I'm wondering if in a future patch Truk shouldn't have repair yard x0 so the japanese player can expand if it he wished.. All I know about Truk was that it was a huge naval base for japan - their main base in the south pacific.. Should it have any repair yard ability ? Did it have any historically ?

Xargun
User avatar
Panzer76
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 11:00 pm

Suggestion

Post by Panzer76 »

When selecting a unit, I dont want the to see their range as cicles, but as highlighted hexes. Why? The circles are "as the crow flies", ships does not fly.. and their path may be different than you thought it would be. The result being that your Bombardment TF is stranded out in the oacean because the target was inside the circle, but not within movment distance anyway.

Normal radius: bright blue/gree/whatever the ground colour is.
Extended: A bit darker.
Rest of map: darker still.

Just enough so I can see a differance. This is btw a de facto standard showing ranges for hex games, why WitP has not incooperated it I would be curious to know.

Airforce:

Would like the option (button) to tell my air group to avoid air combat. So I can put my bombers on naval attack and they wont go suicidal attacking ships in ports with CAPs or CVs.
Cheers,
Panzer

"The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either."

Benjamin Franklin
Image
User avatar
Platoonist
Posts: 3042
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 4:53 am
Location: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems

RE: Suggestion

Post by Platoonist »

I'm wondering if in a future patch Truk shouldn't have repair yard x0 so the japanese player can expand if it he wished.. All I know about Truk was that it was a huge naval base for japan - their main base in the south pacific.. Should it have any repair yard ability ? Did it have any historically ?


Found this tidbit about Truk on the web

Five airstrips and seaplane bases were built in Truk Lagoon, some initially as civilian facilities, and they were quickly converted to military use. As the war progressed, only minimal repair facilities, fortifications and defences were established and when the Japanese Army arrived en masse in January 1944, they considered the base was poorly equipped to defend itself.

Odd as it may seem Truk was never used as much more than a large naval anchorage.
Image
User avatar
fbastos
Posts: 827
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 11:05 pm

RE: Infochart

Post by fbastos »

DOOLITTLE RAID!

Make a carrier-based B-25 squadron available during one month only; if they manage to hit Tokyo, get some political points.
I'm running out of jokes...

Image
User avatar
fbastos
Posts: 827
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 11:05 pm

RE: Infochart

Post by fbastos »

BLIMPS!

Where are the blimps? I thought there were several dozen used by the US Navy for coastal patrol.
I'm running out of jokes...

Image
User avatar
kayjay
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 11:30 am
Location: JS J4 Pentagon

RE: Information/Order Screens

Post by kayjay »

INFORMATION SCREENS COMBAT REPORT

Make the the big rectangular screen that pops up when reporting combat results moveable(must) and sizeable (maybe) as is standard in Windows. When an interesting report comes up
the map centers over whats of intersest and the screen covers it up so you have to look really quick between refreshes or set the delay so slow that it takes forever to get thru all the trivail stuff.

Kevin
Kevin Kelley
User avatar
kayjay
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 11:30 am
Location: JS J4 Pentagon

RE: Information/Order Screens

Post by kayjay »

INFORMATION SCREENS THAT POP UP DURING TURN EXECUTION
Allow ability to turn off all information screens and 'jump' animation that pop up and require a response during turn execution. There is nothing the player can do anyway! This would allow the turn to run all the way through. Capture the information scrolling down in the lower left hand in a .txt file time stamped with that turns execution date (actually I think this is done in the save game directory) and make it accessable from the top menu bar with a click so that it can be scrolled thru for review.

Kevin
Kevin Kelley
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”