Losing the war

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Guderon
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:43 pm
Location: Arizona

RE: Losing the war

Post by Guderon »

I forget now....what was the topic of this thread again? [:D]
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Losing the war

Post by Nikademus »

My foot.......


THE T_T_TANK.......IS ON........MY FOOT.

User avatar
Sharkosaurus rex
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:25 am
Location: under the waves
Contact:

RE: Losing the war

Post by Sharkosaurus rex »

That's what happens when you climb up their sides. You have to mount from the front or back!
Is Sharkosaurus rex the biggest fish in the sea?
Why don't you come in for a swim?
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Losing the war

Post by Nikademus »

LOL...

that reminds me, two weeks ago I dragged the girlfriend up to go see some "old concrete" (i.e. some more of Washington State's coastal forts)

anyway we're on our way back and taking the scenic route back to I-5....we start passing through this little town, when i spot a Stuart Tank in the middle of a little park.

(SCREECH) go the breaks. Gotta park get out and stretch the legs.....by climbing all over the tank looking for a way in. Picture the girlfriend standing by the car, toe tapping, frown on face.

Real Kodak moment [:D]
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Losing the war

Post by DuckofTindalos »

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

ORIGINAL: Terminus
Yeah, but WWII did prove the Soviet adage that "quality has a quantity all its own". After all, the Germans manufactured in excess of 35,000 Me-109s.

I think you got this backwards. "Quantity has a Quality all it's own" is the way I remember it.

Sheesh, how embarassing. Well, there's a heat wave here in Denmark at the moment, and the CPU fan on my brain is overloading...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
Guderon
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:43 pm
Location: Arizona

RE: Losing the war

Post by Guderon »

Have you been to the Aberdeen Proving Grounds? I got a chance to go a few years ago while visiting an old buddy who lives in D.C. It's awesome! There's a bunch of WWII armor there including a Panther, a Tiger I, and unbelievably, an honest-to-goodness Jagdtiger! The Jagdtiger even had some combat damage - a couple of shell hits to it's frontal armor. Well, you couldn't really call it damage per se - they were just small 'divots' in the armor inasmuch as there wasn't an antitank round in WWII that could penetrate a Jagdtiger through it's frontal armor. And please everybody - let's not start this whole armor thing back up again! [:D]
User avatar
Sharkosaurus rex
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:25 am
Location: under the waves
Contact:

RE: Losing the war

Post by Sharkosaurus rex »

Your g/f might have been cross because she didn't have anything handy to clean the windscreen with and make some snacks while you were looking at the tank. She just felt she could have been doing more.

NB: Next time take the car vaccum with you so g/f has something to do.
Is Sharkosaurus rex the biggest fish in the sea?
Why don't you come in for a swim?
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Losing the war

Post by DuckofTindalos »

I've seen pictures of the Jagdtiger they have at Aberdeen. It's so big it's actually scary!
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
Guderon
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:43 pm
Location: Arizona

RE: Losing the war

Post by Guderon »

ORIGINAL: Sharkosaurus rex

Your g/f might have been cross because she didn't have anything handy to clean the windscreen with and make some snacks while you were looking at the tank. She just felt she could have been doing more.

NB: Next time take the car vaccum with you so g/f has something to do.
[:D][:D][:D]
User avatar
denisonh
Posts: 2083
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Upstate SC

RE: Losing the war

Post by denisonh »

Two great quotes from Marshall Zhukov

"Quantity has a quality all of it's own"
"Perfect is the enemy of good enough"
ORIGINAL: Guderon

Have you been to the Aberdeen Proving Grounds? I got a chance to go a few years ago while visiting an old buddy who lives in D.C. It's awesome! There's a bunch of WWII armor there including a Panther, a Tiger I, and unbelievably, an honest-to-goodness Jagdtiger! The Jagdtiger even had some combat damage - a couple of shell hits to it's frontal armor. Well, you couldn't really call it damage per se - they were just small 'divots' in the armor inasmuch as there wasn't an antitank round in WWII that could penetrate a Jagdtiger through it's frontal armor. And please everybody - let's not start this whole armor thing back up again! [:D]
"Life is tough, it's even tougher when you're stupid" -SGT John M. Stryker, USMC
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Losing the war

Post by Nikademus »

havn't had the pleasure yet, but i did get to go to the Military Museum in London a couple years ago. Great selection of perfectly preserved tanks (because they are indoors) including a knocked out Jagdpanther.

oooooooo.......was in heaven for an afternoon. It also had the shattered remains of an A6M on the 2nd floor....not much to look at but still, there's always that buzz you get when you touch a piece of history vs a fully intact replica.
Guderon
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:43 pm
Location: Arizona

RE: Losing the war

Post by Guderon »

Yeah, it's truly inspiring to stand right up next to one. It was the heaviest AFV (both in weight and in armor thickness) to actually see production in WWII. The Germans had a prototype called the Maus which was even a good bit larger and heavier than the Jagdtiger, but it never saw production. It actually had secondary and even tertiary guns. The closest thing to a land battleship anyone ever attempted.
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Losing the war

Post by DuckofTindalos »

Heh... I think the Maus had a 75mm gun AS A SECONDARY WEAPON! It could move at 10 miles per hour or something similar...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16375
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Losing the war

Post by Mike Solli »

You're right. The main gun was a 150 mm I believe.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Sharkosaurus rex
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:25 am
Location: under the waves
Contact:

RE: Losing the war

Post by Sharkosaurus rex »

That's why the Germans lost. What is the point of making that monster? Just a waste of time and resources like engineers who should know better. It's couldn't cross any standard wooden bridge in Germany so had to be prepped for underwater use to cross a simple stream.
Is Sharkosaurus rex the biggest fish in the sea?
Why don't you come in for a swim?
Guderon
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:43 pm
Location: Arizona

RE: Losing the war

Post by Guderon »

I'm curious - do you remember where the fatal blow came for the Jagdtiger you saw? I know most of them that were knocked out were from the air from 5" rockets and specialized AT cannon. They were huge targets from the air (I once saw a photo of the entire crew of one sunbathing on top of the fixed turret, and there was plenty of room to spare!) and not very well armored on the top. They truly were impenetrable from the front and even difficult to knock out from the sides. Maybe a close range 90mm or 17 lbr. from the sides might have done it.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16375
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Losing the war

Post by Mike Solli »

Consider the lunatic who was in charge....
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
Guderon
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:43 pm
Location: Arizona

RE: Losing the war

Post by Guderon »

Whoops, Nik - I just re-read your post. You said Jagdpanther, not Jagdtiger. My mistake...[8|]
Guderon
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:43 pm
Location: Arizona

RE: Losing the war

Post by Guderon »

Yep. And for that matter, there were a lot of bridges that the Jagdtiger couldn't cross at 70-odd tons....
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Losing the war

Post by DuckofTindalos »

Since we've now comfortably settled on the battlefields of Europe, rather than the Pacific war, does anybody know if any Jagdtigers fought in the East? It was my impression that they were all used in the West?
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”