The Yunnan railway was a narrow railway (metric-gauge) from Kunming to Hanoi in Vietnam. It was constructed by the French from 1903 to 1910. If I remember correctly, the Chinese removed parts of the line after the Japanese occupation of Indochina in 1940 and the rail line was not reopened until 1957... Anyway, I don't think that a metric-gauge railway would qualify for a railway line in game terms!
IF a "metric railway does not qualify for a railway line in game terms" we lose ALL rail lines in Burma, Thailand, Malaya, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and many other places. And probably in the Indies - 3 foot 6 inch is almost exactly 1 meter - just a hair over! Actually, that is not the criteria.
It is the weight of the rail and the nature of the service (primary, secondary or tirtiary). We have secondary rail lines defined as = to roads in many places - and IF you wanted to do that to ALL SE Asia - I would be receptive to the argument. But not the main lines on Java - which are "absolutely the most efficient...3 foot 6 inch lines in the world."
Also, you might just make the case for Burma alone - because its rail weight on the main line is very very low - and because it has very low capacity RR workshops.
Now I had not heard that the line to Kunming was torn up. But I also rated it as a road = secondary line in the first place - so probably that is the right way to go. But I will listen to more comment on this matter. I know the FFL marched down the line - they didn't take a train. Note that I have added mountains, so the route needs to be defined for troops to pass - and this is hardly a trail.