IJ production mistakes

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Hanzberger
Posts: 925
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 12:16 pm
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Contact:

RE: 9-15-42

Post by Hanzberger »

Oh Sweet,N scale, that is the little guys? (Nashvillen)[8|]
Playing Scen 2 vs Ai currently

Japan AC wire chart here
tm.asp?m=2769286&mpage=1&key=?
User avatar
nashvillen
Posts: 3835
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 3:07 am
Location: Christiana, TN

RE: 9-15-42

Post by nashvillen »

Yes, indeed, we are the little guys (says the 6'3" former D lineman that weighs 300+ pounds).

See my groups web page: http://www.nashvillentrak.org
Image
CaptDave
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 9:11 pm
Location: Federal Way, WA

RE: 9-15-42

Post by CaptDave »

ORIGINAL: nashvillen

Yes, indeed, we are the little guys (says the 6'3" former D lineman that weighs 300+ pounds).

See my groups web page: http://www.nashvillentrak.org

As does the former equipment manager of pretty much the same proportions (2 inches shorter). To those of us in the know, that's "Normal" scale (as opposed to Zany, Totally Terrible, Hugely Oversized, Strange, Outrageous, and Gross). The rest of the world thinks N got its name because the track gauge is 9mm and the word for "nine" starts with the letter N in practically every language, but true N scalers know better. [:D]
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: 9-15-42

Post by herwin »

ORIGINAL: CaptDave

ORIGINAL: nashvillen

Yes, indeed, we are the little guys (says the 6'3" former D lineman that weighs 300+ pounds).

See my groups web page: http://www.nashvillentrak.org

As does the former equipment manager of pretty much the same proportions (2 inches shorter). To those of us in the know, that's "Normal" scale (as opposed to Zany, Totally Terrible, Hugely Oversized, Strange, Outrageous, and Gross). The rest of the world thinks N got its name because the track gauge is 9mm and the word for "nine" starts with the letter N in practically every language, but true N scalers know better. [:D]

I don't know, but I think I know what you mean... In a rugby game, an NFL all-pro MLB once got the ball and it was my job to take him down. He scored, but I was still holding on. My playing weight was 175 pounds.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
User avatar
nashvillen
Posts: 3835
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 3:07 am
Location: Christiana, TN

RE: 9-15-42

Post by nashvillen »

ORIGINAL: CaptDave

ORIGINAL: nashvillen

Yes, indeed, we are the little guys (says the 6'3" former D lineman that weighs 300+ pounds).

See my groups web page: http://www.nashvillentrak.org

As does the former equipment manager of pretty much the same proportions (2 inches shorter). To those of us in the know, that's "Normal" scale (as opposed to Zany, Totally Terrible, Hugely Oversized, Strange, Outrageous, and Gross). The rest of the world thinks N got its name because the track gauge is 9mm and the word for "nine" starts with the letter N in practically every language, but true N scalers know better. [:D]

+1
Image
User avatar
inqistor
Posts: 1813
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 1:19 pm

RE: 9-15-42

Post by inqistor »

As I understand this is not stock scenario? What exactly was the economic changes for this MOD?
I hope it is almost impossible to starve Japan industry in 8 months in stock?
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4008
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 9-15-42

Post by bigred »

ORIGINAL: Hanzberger

Big Red, go to your industry screen, sort the fuel, most at the top and post a screen shot.
STOP shipping oil. Do not refuel at the HI's. (the small ASW crap is ok).
All your other numbers look good to me. I haven't played as far as you yet but I have read enough.
I would turn the H industry back on, don't wanna get low on supply.
You can email your latest save and I take a look around, not an expert, but maybe I will see something.
Let me know what version your playing.


Image
Attachments
AR.jpg
AR.jpg (163.06 KiB) Viewed 71 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4008
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 9-15-42

Post by bigred »

ORIGINAL: inqistor

As I understand this is not stock scenario? What exactly was the economic changes for this MOD?
I hope it is almost impossible to starve Japan industry in 8 months in stock?
I understand you would like a challenge.
tm.asp?m=2452466
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17511
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: 9-15-42

Post by John 3rd »

The newest version of RA (3.0) isn't toooooo far from being released. The economy changes are not too big. I'd say we're about 75% finished and want the new patch released before we are done...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
Sun Tempest
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:28 pm

RE: 9-15-42

Post by Sun Tempest »

ORIGINAL: bigred

and the alert chart:

I opened the road from Singers to Port Authur about 20 days ago....I then rebased some convoys to PA, which now seems to have been a mistake...I have plenty of oil on Honshu...


bigred, I would have request from you. I'm not sure about the existence of Port Arthur Singapore highway, with some say that exist while either deny. Could you provide several images with the evolution of oil and fuel stocks in China, Manchucko, Thailand, Vietnam areas in last 30-40 turns.

Thank you and sorry for derailing your topic[&o]
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4008
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 9-15-42

Post by bigred »

ORIGINAL: Hanzberger

Big Red, go to your industry screen, sort the fuel, most at the top and post a screen shot.
STOP shipping oil. Do not refuel at the HI's. (the small ASW crap is ok).
All your other numbers look good to me. I haven't played as far as you yet but I have read enough.
I would turn the H industry back on, don't wanna get low on supply.
You can email your latest save and I take a look around, not an expert, but maybe I will see something.
Let me know what version your playing.
hans, go ahead and post those airflow charts...they apply to senario 1 and 2 ...I like to share knowledge.
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
inqistor
Posts: 1813
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 1:19 pm

RE: 9-15-42

Post by inqistor »

I see vague mentioning about initial fuel reduction, but how big it is actually? Does it include also oil, or number of refineries?

I have seen shortages of supply at this time-point, but there should be enough fuel, for at least another 6 months, even with serious fleet actions. For sure refineries should produce enough to fuel all HI.

Are those 999 turned off refineries all in Japan?
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4008
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 9-15-42

Post by bigred »

Are those 999 turned off refineries all in Japan?

All refineries are "on". Not all refineries are repaired.

Image
Attachments
ref.jpg
ref.jpg (90.74 KiB) Viewed 71 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4008
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 9-15-42

Post by bigred »

I see vague mentioning about initial fuel reduction, but how big it is actually? Does it include also oil, or number of refineries?
This is the starting RA70 oil and supply situation. Dont remember senario 2 dec7 start levels.


Image
Attachments
ra70 start resources.jpg
ra70 start resources.jpg (80.71 KiB) Viewed 71 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4008
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 9-15-42

Post by bigred »

ORIGINAL: Sun Tempest

ORIGINAL: bigred

and the alert chart:

I opened the road from Singers to Port Authur about 20 days ago....I then rebased some convoys to PA, which now seems to have been a mistake...I have plenty of oil on Honshu...


bigred, I would have request from you. I'm not sure about the existence of Port Arthur Singapore highway, with some say that exist while either deny. Could you provide several images with the evolution of oil and fuel stocks in China, Manchucko, Thailand, Vietnam areas in last 30-40 turns.

Thank you and sorry for derailing your topic[&o]
Ok, maybe I can look up some old files...off the top of my head I noticed marginal increases at HK, Shanghai, PA, but did not look at Puson until today. Looks like the Port Auther route opened around the 5th of August 42...I will load a file frome 1 aug42 w/ a look to above mentioned ports...Then I will post a current picture.
I do remember Singers resources jumped 300000 after the road opened...I was mildly shocked.
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4008
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 9-15-42

Post by bigred »

The China road: not open on 3aug42.

Image
Attachments
china road.jpg
china road.jpg (191.37 KiB) Viewed 71 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4008
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 9-15-42

Post by bigred »

Ports status 3 aug 42:

Image
Attachments
ports aug 42.jpg
ports aug 42.jpg (236.62 KiB) Viewed 71 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4008
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 9-15-42

Post by bigred »

ports SRA 3 aug42:



Image
Attachments
ports 2.jpg
ports 2.jpg (161.15 KiB) Viewed 71 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4008
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 9-15-42

Post by bigred »

ports sept 42:



Image
Attachments
ports sept 42.jpg
ports sept 42.jpg (265.32 KiB) Viewed 71 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4008
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 9-15-42

Post by bigred »

SRA Sept ports:

Image
Attachments
ports sept 42.jpg
ports sept 42.jpg (137.88 KiB) Viewed 71 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”