THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Rio Bravo
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:57 pm
Location: Grass Valley, California
Contact:

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by Rio Bravo »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Looks like Imphal will get some party crashers. Good luck with holding them.
Can you put any bombers at a nearby base to help out?

BBfanboy-

Those are the last two Chinese units in Burma and heading for Imphal.

Group 222 RAF is at Calcutta. After some minor maintenance for a few aircraft, 222 Raf Group will fly further South and AFQ India will fly to Calcutta.

Best Regards,

-Terry
"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven
User avatar
Rio Bravo
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:57 pm
Location: Grass Valley, California
Contact:

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by Rio Bravo »

[center]Combat Report[/center]
[center]for[/center]
[center]April 25, 1942[/center]

Japanese Amphibious Assault Loewoek:

Amphibious Assault at Loewoek (71,101)

TF 342 troops unloading over beach at Loewoek, 71,101

Japanese ground losses:
18 casualties reported

Squads: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

17 troops of a SNLF Squad lost overboard during unload of 18th Nav Gd /2

Japanese Attack Remnants of Sabang Garrison Near Langsa:

Ground combat at 45,72 (near Langsa)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 3632 troops, 26 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 127

Defending force 748 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 24

Japanese adjusted assault: 61

Allied adjusted defense: 3

Japanese assault odds: 20 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), fatigue(-), morale(-)
experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(+), fatigue(-)

Allied ground losses:
310 casualties reported

Squads: 11 destroyed, 7 disabled
Non Combat: 9 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Units retreated 3

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
41st Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
Korps Marechausee Battalion
2nd Garrison Battalion
Sabang Base Force

Chinese Kick Ass at Lanchow!

Ground combat at Lanchow (81,34)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 20516 troops, 100 guns, 694 vehicles, Assault Value = 933

Defending force 24457 troops, 86 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 802

Japanese adjusted assault: 628

Allied adjusted defense: 1207

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 4)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
2432 casualties reported

Squads: 65 destroyed, 179 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 37 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1801 casualties reported

Squads: 6 destroyed, 188 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 15 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 9 disabled

Assaulting units:
4th Garrison Unit
10th Tank Regiment
23rd Tank Regiment
12th Tank Regiment
5th Armored Car Co
8th Recon Regiment
1st Ind.Mixed Brigade
15th Tank Regiment
2nd Ind.Mixed Brigade
11th Tank Regiment

Defending units:
9th Separate Brigade
303rd Brigade
34th Separate Brigade
27th Chinese Corps
259th Brigade
82nd Chinese Corps
8th Chinese Base Force
8th War Area
19th Chinese Base Force
21st Chinese Base Force

Allies Hold Their Ground Near Medan!

Ground combat at 46,77 (near Medan)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 1468 troops, 12 guns, 12 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 61

Defending force 1794 troops, 9 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 55

Japanese adjusted assault: 25

Allied adjusted defense: 17

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(+), leaders(-)

Japanese ground losses:
26 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
64 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
44th Naval Guard Unit

Defending units:
Medan Garrison Battalion
Van Aaran Garrison Battalion
Tapanoeli Gsn Battalion
Medan Coastal Gun Battalion
Medan Base Force

Best Regards,

-Terry
"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven
User avatar
Rio Bravo
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:57 pm
Location: Grass Valley, California
Contact:

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by Rio Bravo »

[center]Combat Report[/center]
[center]for[/center]
[center]April 26, 1942[/center]

Japanese Destroyer Dents Tin Can Off Rangoon Moon:

Sub attack near Rangoon at 53,56

Japanese Ships
DD Shigure

Allied Ships
SS KXVIII, hits 1


SS KXVIII launches 4 torpedoes
DD Shigure fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Shigure fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Shigure fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Shigure fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Shigure attacking submerged sub ....
Escort abandons search for sub

Japanese Amphibious Assault Boeton:

Amphibious Assault at Boeton (69,108)

TF 245 troops unloading over beach at Boeton, 69,108

Japanese ground losses:
22 casualties reported

Squads: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)

7.7mm T99 AAMG dropped into water during unload of 1st JNAF AF Unit /11
17 troops of a SNLF Squad lost overboard during unload of 53rd Nav Gd /14

Japanese Amphibious Assault Hex 58,89:

Amphibious Assault at 58,89

TF 430 troops unloading over beach at 58,89

Japanese ground losses:
24 casualties reported

Squads: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

19 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost overboard during unload of II./124th Infantry Bn /1

Bet Regards,

-Terry
"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven
User avatar
Rio Bravo
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:57 pm
Location: Grass Valley, California
Contact:

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by Rio Bravo »

[center]A Question[/center]
[center]for[/center]
[center]The War College Members[/center]

As most of you are no doubt aware, India has grown strong in both ground and air forces.

The Allies have begun to move further South; including fighter and bomber squadrons.

The Japanese have invaded Burma, but to date (i.e., April 27, 1942), the Japanese have not entered Ceylon, nor India.

For quite some time now, I have been training medium level bomber squadrons for ground attack and fighter squadrons for escort.

Should the Japanese invade India, to inflict the greatest damage on Japanese ground forces, do you think the "training" is appropriate or should I begin training fighter squadrons for "Sweep?"

Your comments, advice, and critiques are always appreciated.

Thank you, each of you.

Best Regards,

-Terry
"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven
User avatar
Rio Bravo
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:57 pm
Location: Grass Valley, California
Contact:

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by Rio Bravo »

[center]Combat Report[/center]
[center]for[/center]
[center]April 27, 1942[/center]

El Lobo Captures Boeton:

Ground combat at Boeton (69,108)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 2333 troops, 21 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 69

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 66

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 66 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Boeton !!!

Combat modifiers
Attacker:

Assaulting units:
53rd Naval Guard Unit
1st JNAF AF Unit

Japanese Subs Spew Monkey Mucus Off the Coast of Rangoon and Pt. Blair:

Sub attack near Rangoon at 53,56

Japanese Ships
DD Natsugumo
DD Minegumo

Allied Ships
SS KXVIII, hits 3


SS KXVIII launches 2 torpedoes at DD Natsugumo
DD Minegumo attacking submerged sub ....
DD Minegumo fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Minegumo fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Minegumo fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Minegumo fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

And

ASW attack near Port Blair at 46,58

Japanese Ships
DD Hatsushima

Allied Ships
SS O21, hits 6


SS O21 is located by DD Hatsushima
O21 bottoming out ....
DD Hatsushima fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Hatsushima fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Hatsushima attacking submerged sub ....
DD Hatsushima fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Hatsushima fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

Japanese Push Dutch Around Near Loemadjang, Near Langsa, and Near Hankow:

Ground combat at 57,106 (near Loemadjang )

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 30465 troops, 456 guns, 186 vehicles, Assault Value = 1089

Defending force 3330 troops, 25 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 22

Japanese adjusted assault: 312

Allied adjusted defense: 49

Japanese assault odds: 6 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
75 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
813 casualties reported

Squads: 39 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 63 destroyed, 53 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 3 disabled
Guns lost 15 (8 destroyed, 7 disabled)
Units retreated 4
Units destroyed 1


Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
21st Division
8th Tank Regiment
33rd Division
21st Infantry Regiment
5th Guards Cav Regiment
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
3rd Mortar Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
5th Mortar Battalion
14th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion

Defending units:
6th KNIL Regiment
Marinier Battalion
Commandement Marine
MLD
Soerabaja Base Force
Malang Base Force

And

Ground combat at 45,73 (near Langsa)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 3622 troops, 26 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 126

Defending force 492 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 9

Japanese adjusted assault: 44

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 44 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-), disruption(-), fatigue(-)
morale(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(+), leaders(-), fatigue(-)

Allied ground losses:
139 casualties reported

Squads: 5 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 6 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Units retreated 3

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
41st Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
Korps Marechausee Battalion
2nd Garrison Battalion
Sabang Base Force

And

Ground combat at 85,49 (near Hankow)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 2280 troops, 12 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 105

Defending force 4099 troops, 22 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 31

Japanese adjusted assault: 59

Allied adjusted defense: 21

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: op mode(-)

Allied ground losses:
1190 casualties reported

Squads: 56 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 62 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 4 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 2 (2 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
11th RGC Temp. Division

Defending units:
90th Chinese Corps

Chinese Spank Japanese at Ankang!


Ground combat at Ankang (88,52)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 11009 troops, 83 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 400

Defending force 11328 troops, 69 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 364

Japanese adjusted assault: 167

Allied adjusted defense: 143

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(+), morale(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
425 casualties reported

Squads: 1 destroyed, 53 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 8 (1 destroyed, 7 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
278 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 41 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Assaulting units:
13th Ind.Mixed Brigade
Ankei SNLF
138th Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
7th Chinese Corps
84th Chinese Corps
21st Group Army

Chinese Shred Japanese at Chengteh!

Ground combat at Changteh (81,50)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 46143 troops, 527 guns, 72 vehicles, Assault Value = 1822

Defending force 28733 troops, 144 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 779

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 2

Japanese adjusted assault: 745

Allied adjusted defense: 733

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
3452 casualties reported

Squads: 10 destroyed, 352 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 15 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 37 disabled
Guns lost 14 (2 destroyed, 12 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
696 casualties reported

Squads: 1 destroyed, 97 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 14 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled

Assaulting units:
6th Division
39th Division
57th Infantry Brigade
40th Division
55th Infantry Brigade
5th RF Gun Battalion
1st JAAF AF Coy
2nd RF Gun Battalion
47th JAAF AF Bn
21st Mortar Battalion
28th Mountain Gun Regiment
8th Mountain Gun Regiment
2nd JAAF AF Coy
RGC Army
67th JAAF AF Coy

Defending units:
10th Chinese Corps
74th Chinese Corps
5th Construction Regiment
19th Group Army
29th Group Army
27th Group Army
17th Chinese Base Force

Best Regards,

-Terry
"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: Rio Bravo

[center]A Question[/center]
[center]for[/center]
[center]The War College Members[/center]

As most of you are no doubt aware, India has grown strong in both ground and air forces.

The Allies have begun to move further South; including fighter and bomber squadrons.

The Japanese have invaded Burma, but to date (i.e., April 27, 1942), the Japanese have not entered Ceylon, nor India.

For quite some time now, I have been training medium level bomber squadrons for ground attack and fighter squadrons for escort.

Should the Japanese invade India, to inflict the greatest damage on Japanese ground forces, do you think the "training" is appropriate or should I begin training fighter squadrons for "Sweep?"

Your comments, advice, and critiques are always appreciated.

Thank you, each of you.

Best Regards,

-Terry


Train fighter pilots in Air Combat to 70 first. This will get overall experience to the mid to upper 50s. It will get Defense to the mid 40s to mid 50s range.

Then switch training to Sweep at 100 feet. The low altitude will spur gains in Defense and overall experience.

There is no one skill that can be trained to 70 and get other complimentary skills to where you want them.

Training in multiple skills is necessary to get overall experience up.

Fighters will perform better in both interception, escort and sweeps with higher defense and higher overall skill than they will with 70 Air combat and OA and Defensed in the 50s.
Hans

User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20706
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by BBfanboy »

HansBolter, I tried recently to use training Sweep at 100 feet to try advance Defensive training a little faster. To my surprise, despite the Sweep training set, the squadron trained in Strafe! I even had a recon squadron I was training at 100 feet start getting Strafe skill!

I think this came with the recent changes that lowered the minimum level for GroundB down from 5000 to 2000 feet. Now I use 1000 feet to train fighters and Recon/ASW/NavS, and 2000 feet for other bombing type skills. I only use 100 feet when I really want fighters or assault bombers to raise Strafe skill.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

HansBolter, I tried recently to use training Sweep at 100 feet to try advance Defensive training a little faster. To my surprise, despite the Sweep training set, the squadron trained in Strafe! I even had a recon squadron I was training at 100 feet start getting Strafe skill!

I think this came with the recent changes that lowered the minimum level for GroundB down from 5000 to 2000 feet. Now I use 1000 feet to train fighters and Recon/ASW/NavS, and 2000 feet for other bombing type skills. I only use 100 feet when I really want fighters or assault bombers to raise Strafe skill.

You may be right about getting gains in strafing, but you should also be seeing significant gains in defense.

I know training at 100 ft. spurs gains in defense.

I'll grab a screenshot tonight to illustrate. My game is near the end of the month so lots of green and orange skill gain flags are present.
Hans

User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20706
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: HansBolter
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

HansBolter, I tried recently to use training Sweep at 100 feet to try advance Defensive training a little faster. To my surprise, despite the Sweep training set, the squadron trained in Strafe! I even had a recon squadron I was training at 100 feet start getting Strafe skill!

I think this came with the recent changes that lowered the minimum level for GroundB down from 5000 to 2000 feet. Now I use 1000 feet to train fighters and Recon/ASW/NavS, and 2000 feet for other bombing type skills. I only use 100 feet when I really want fighters or assault bombers to raise Strafe skill.

You may be right about getting gains in strafing, but you should also be seeing significant gains in defense.

I know training at 100 ft. spurs gains in defense.

I'll grab a screenshot tonight to illustrate. My game is near the end of the month so lots of green and orange skill gain flags are present.
Maybe I misunderstood your intent - I interpreted it to mean that Sweep training would take place at 100 feet, which it does not. I was aware that Defensive skill would train faster at 100 feet and that is why I had sent planes training Recon skill down there. But that skill didn't train because the 100' level seems to be reserved for strafe training (with defensive skill as a by-product).
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
GetAssista
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:13 am

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by GetAssista »

Escort at whatever height until 70 Air then Sweep at 100 until 70 Def is the running motto of training fighters, although I'd question the second part. You just don't use strafing that often in the war.Well, generally you don't use early allied fighters in any other role other than CAP/Escort, so Air/Def are the skills. But for later fighters with bombloads it might be worth it to train some other secondary skill instead of strafe like naval or ground attack. Becase Def will increase with whatever secondary skill training so the latter might as well be potentially useful.

Bombers you should specialize. There are different kinds of those, and you need very different skills and very different pilots as a result because training a universal bomber pilot is not worth it. But most will need Ground and Naval bombing anyway
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

Escort at whatever height until 70 Air then Sweep at 100 until 70 Def is the running motto of training fighters, although I'd question the second part. You just don't use strafing that often in the war.Well, generally you don't use early allied fighters in any other role other than CAP/Escort, so Air/Def are the skills. But for later fighters with bombloads it might be worth it to train some other secondary skill instead of strafe like naval or ground attack. Becase Def will increase with whatever secondary skill training so the latter might as well be potentially useful.

Bombers you should specialize. There are different kinds of those, and you need very different skills and very different pilots as a result because training a universal bomber pilot is not worth it. But most will need Ground and Naval bombing anyway

All good points.

For bomber pilot training I tend to supplement Nav (whether normal or low) with Nav Search as the secondary skill and supplement Ground (whether normal or low) with Recon as a secondary skill.

Oh, and it's always worth training P39 pilots in strafe, they make great barge busters.



p.s. Sorry for the hijacking RB.
Hans

User avatar
Rio Bravo
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:57 pm
Location: Grass Valley, California
Contact:

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by Rio Bravo »

[center]Combat Report[/center]
[center]for[/center]
[center]April 28, 1942[/center]

Japanese Amphibious Assault Hex 74,100:

Amphibious Assault at 74,100

TF 307 troops unloading over beach at 74,100

Japanese ground losses:
23 casualties reported

Squads: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

17 troops of a SNLF Squad accidentally lost during unload of 62nd Nav Gd

Chinese Remain Stubborn at Anking!

Ground combat at Anking (88,52)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 10674 troops, 83 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 362

Defending force 11053 troops, 69 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 333

Japanese adjusted assault: 168

Allied adjusted defense: 78

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(+), fatigue(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
390 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 31 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
321 casualties reported

Squads: 2 destroyed, 39 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled

Assaulting units:
Ankei SNLF
13th Ind.Mixed Brigade
138th Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
7th Chinese Corps
84th Chinese Corps
21st Group Army

Best Regards,

-Terry
"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven
User avatar
Rio Bravo
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:57 pm
Location: Grass Valley, California
Contact:

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by Rio Bravo »

Hans, BBfanboy, and GetAssista-

Thank you for your aircraft training input.

I will continue to train the medium level bombers for ground attack at 2,000 feet with zero range.

I will switch the fighters for sweep at 100 feet with range of 1.

Best Regards,

-Terry
"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20706
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Rio Bravo

Hans, BBfanboy, and GetAssista-

Thank you for your aircraft training input.

I will continue to train the medium level bombers for ground attack at 2,000 feet with zero range.

I will switch the fighters for sweep at 100 feet with range of 1.

Best Regards,

-Terry
Sweep is meant to train Air skill, but at 100 feet it will train Strafe skill. There is a setting for training Strafe, so I cannot understand why the insistence on setting Sweep skill when if Air is not the target for development. As long as you get the results you plan on getting, I guess you can set whatever you wish ... just sayin' [;)]
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: Rio Bravo

Hans, BBfanboy, and GetAssista-

Thank you for your aircraft training input.

I will continue to train the medium level bombers for ground attack at 2,000 feet with zero range.

I will switch the fighters for sweep at 100 feet with range of 1.

Best Regards,

-Terry
Sweep is meant to train Air skill, but at 100 feet it will train Strafe skill. There is a setting for training Strafe, so I cannot understand why the insistence on setting Sweep skill when if Air is not the target for development. As long as you get the results you plan on getting, I guess you can set whatever you wish ... just sayin' [;)]


There is no Sweep skill. The two skills essential to sweeps are Air (which means offensive air combat) and defense, the same skills essential for escort as there is no escort skill either.

It's simply exploiting a game mechanic to use low level training to spur gains in defense. If training sweep ay 10k spurred the kinds of gains in defense that training it at 100ft do I would be advocating training sweep at 10k.

The gains in straf are simply icing on the cake that you may or may not ever take advantage of.

Later in the war the Allies get more fighters equipped for ground attack so it seems to me to be a good investment to train straf so I have a readily available pool of pilots who can put that skill to use when planes capable of putting it to use start arriving.
Hans

User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20706
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: HansBolter
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: Rio Bravo

Hans, BBfanboy, and GetAssista-

Thank you for your aircraft training input.

I will continue to train the medium level bombers for ground attack at 2,000 feet with zero range.

I will switch the fighters for sweep at 100 feet with range of 1.

Best Regards,

-Terry
Sweep is meant to train Air skill, but at 100 feet it will train Strafe skill. There is a setting for training Strafe, so I cannot understand why the insistence on setting Sweep skill when if Air is not the target for development. As long as you get the results you plan on getting, I guess you can set whatever you wish ... just sayin' [;)]


There is no Sweep skill. The two skills essential to sweeps are Air (which means offensive air combat) and defense, the same skills essential for escort as there is no escort skill either.

It's simply exploiting a game mechanic to use low level training to spur gains in defense. If training sweep ay 10k spurred the kinds of gains in defense that training it at 100ft do I would be advocating training sweep at 10k.

The gains in straf are simply icing on the cake that you may or may not ever take advantage of.

Later in the war the Allies get more fighters equipped for ground attack so it seems to me to be a good investment to train straf so I have a readily available pool of pilots who can put that skill to use when planes capable of putting it to use start arriving.

The point I was trying to make is that if the OP wants to train AIR skill + DEFENCE skill at 100 feet, he will get the Defence but NOT THE AIR SKILL!
If he really wants to train STRAFE + DEFENCE at 100 feet, everything is fine if he uses the Sweep Training setting. It just seems less confusing to use the Strafe Training setting if that is what you want to achieve.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Rio Bravo
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:57 pm
Location: Grass Valley, California
Contact:

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by Rio Bravo »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: HansBolter
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy



Sweep is meant to train Air skill, but at 100 feet it will train Strafe skill. There is a setting for training Strafe, so I cannot understand why the insistence on setting Sweep skill when if Air is not the target for development. As long as you get the results you plan on getting, I guess you can set whatever you wish ... just sayin' [;)]


There is no Sweep skill. The two skills essential to sweeps are Air (which means offensive air combat) and defense, the same skills essential for escort as there is no escort skill either.

It's simply exploiting a game mechanic to use low level training to spur gains in defense. If training sweep ay 10k spurred the kinds of gains in defense that training it at 100ft do I would be advocating training sweep at 10k.

The gains in straf are simply icing on the cake that you may or may not ever take advantage of.

Later in the war the Allies get more fighters equipped for ground attack so it seems to me to be a good investment to train straf so I have a readily available pool of pilots who can put that skill to use when planes capable of putting it to use start arriving.

The point I was trying to make is that if the OP wants to train AIR skill + DEFENCE skill at 100 feet, he will get the Defence but NOT THE AIR SKILL!
If he really wants to train STRAFE + DEFENCE at 100 feet, everything is fine if he uses the Sweep Training setting. It just seems less confusing to use the Strafe Training setting if that is what you want to achieve.


Hans & BBfanboy-

What I'd like is for the bombers to be best at bombing Japanese air bases and Japanese ground troops. And, fighters to escort the bombers or protect Allied bases and Allied ground troops.

Perhaps, down the road, priorities will change.

But, right now, I want to be in the best position to defend India and Australia. That means pound Japanese ground troops, destroy any air bases he may build up, and protect Allied bases and troops.

So, what would be the best training besides escort for the bombers?

Best Regards,

Terry
"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20706
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by BBfanboy »

Escort and Sweep both train Air Skill, which is what fighters use in combat. It does not matter which one you train them in, but you must be 1000 feet or higher to get the training because the AI will assume Strafe training if you set them at 100 feet. The low level is desirable for Defensive Skill gains, but you cannot go all the way down to 100 feet if you want to train Air Skill.

You can train bombers in any of the bombing missions - Airfield Attack, Naval Attack, etc. but be aware that 2000 feet is the minimum level for Ground B or Nav B training with bombs. If you go down to 1000 feet you get Low Ground or Low Nav training. Go down to 100 feet and you get Strafe training again, regardless of what you set as the target skill. Low level bombing is really supposed to be reserved for Assault bombers.

Of course if you want to train torpedo bombers you must select torpedoes (even if the base has none!) and Naval Attack for the training. You can go down to 1000 feet for this.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Rio Bravo
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:57 pm
Location: Grass Valley, California
Contact:

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by Rio Bravo »

[center]Combat Report[/center]
[center]for[/center]
[center]April 29, 1942[/center]

Japanese Wipe Out 6th KNIL Regiment Near Loemadjang:

Ground combat at 57,106 (near Loemadjang)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 31727 troops, 456 guns, 377 vehicles, Assault Value = 1090

Defending force 639 troops, 10 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2

Japanese adjusted assault: 709

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 709 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), morale(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Allied ground losses:
881 casualties reported

Squads: 16 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 81 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 10 (10 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Assaulting units:
21st Infantry Regiment
8th Tank Regiment
21st Division
33rd Division
5th Guards Cav Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
5th Mortar Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
3rd Mortar Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
14th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion

Defending units:
6th KNIL Regiment

Chinese "Just Say No" to Japanese At Anking!

Ground combat at Anking

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 10472 troops, 83 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 340

Defending force 10735 troops, 69 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 294

Japanese adjusted assault: 119

Allied adjusted defense: 48

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(+), fatigue(-), morale(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(-)

Japanese ground losses:
211 casualties reported

Squads: 2 destroyed, 34 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 5 (1 destroyed, 4 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
316 casualties reported

Squads: 2 destroyed, 31 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
Ankei SNLF
13th Ind.Mixed Brigade
138th Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
7th Chinese Corps
84th Chinese Corps
21st Group Army

Best Regards,

-Terry
"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven
User avatar
Rio Bravo
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:57 pm
Location: Grass Valley, California
Contact:

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

Post by Rio Bravo »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Escort and Sweep both train Air Skill, which is what fighters use in combat. It does not matter which one you train them in, but you must be 1000 feet or higher to get the training because the AI will assume Strafe training if you set them at 100 feet. The low level is desirable for Defensive Skill gains, but you cannot go all the way down to 100 feet if you want to train Air Skill.

You can train bombers in any of the bombing missions - Airfield Attack, Naval Attack, etc. but be aware that 2000 feet is the minimum level for Ground B or Nav B training with bombs. If you go down to 1000 feet you get Low Ground or Low Nav training. Go down to 100 feet and you get Strafe training again, regardless of what you set as the target skill. Low level bombing is really supposed to be reserved for Assault bombers.

Of course if you want to train torpedo bombers you must select torpedoes (even if the base has none!) and Naval Attack for the training. You can go down to 1000 feet for this.


BBfanboy-

Perfect.

Today, April 30, 1942, I will issue orders for all India Medium Level Bombers to continue Ground Attack training at 2,000 feet and issue orders for all India Fighters to commence Escort training at 1,500 feet.

Thank you, pal.

Best Regards,

-Terry
"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”