Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by mind_messing »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

The fighter bomber fleet:

In this game Japan has made and will continue to make a large investment in fighter bombers. Currently there are 8 Sentai and 2 Chutai, with no more growth anticipated until 1943 starts and I fail to get auto victory or not.

The A model will be the primary anti bomber FB.
The C model will be more specialized in strafing both ships and ground targets but primarily ground.

The Randy will replace both models on the front lines and extra Nicks will either go kamikaze (no more than 1 squadron) or late game reserve.

I am trying a new to me tactic of LRCAP enemy bases likely to see air transport with Nick A. So for nothing, but I am only doing Chungking. I have hopes of catching something in the Aleutians I think (although, there I will use the A6M3a).

The Nick C primary attribute I like is the use of the Nick D engine rather than the Ha35.

I'm interested to see how that works out for you, as the Randy airframes are such a mixed bag IMO.

The Randy A is an absolute necessity for the late game IMO. The superb max altitude and solid armament, durability and armour make it a great anti-bomber and high CAP fighter. Plus it's classed as a fighter so the majority of IJA squadrons can convert to it.

The Randy B I just can't like. Besides the slightly better armaments package and speed I'm hard pushed to see the improvement between the Nick C and Randy B.

The Randy C I want to love. It would be perfect if only the radar arrived a little earlier, but without the radar it's hard to sell over a less effective but more accessible airframe like the Nick NF.

Regarding Nicks as kamikaze airframes, there are a fair few of late-war IJA ten plane training squadrons that arrive using Nate B models that are mapped to upgrade to the Nate A. The Nate A is classed as a fighter-bomber, so it's possible to convert them to the Nate A model and then to Nicks for kami duty. I would absolutely say that there's a role for them here, given how twin-engine planes tend to have a better time getting through CAP and flak than single-engine types. At any rate it can help to distribute the load of kami aircraft losses in the late game. Kami squadrons can also be told to perform CAP, but I've never tested if they actually do so.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

Kami squadrons can also be told to perform CAP, but I've never tested if they actually do so.

They do. I had hoped they would have a higher percentage chance of driving their planes into 4E bombers, but they didn't. Perhaps there are other benefits to using them as cap...perhaps not checking morale? Just guessing.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

The Randy B I just can't like. Besides the slightly better armaments package and speed I'm hard pushed to see the improvement between the Nick C and Randy B.

I think you might be surprised by what 2cl 20mm and 20 or 24mph faster can do. And the big gun for hoots and giggles.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Lowpe »

October 25, 1942

The Commonwealth is trying to push forward, and Chitt only has one unit defending it.

Here we savage an Indian Brigade.

In China, Kweiyang may fall tomorrow.

Image
Attachments
witpae.jpg
witpae.jpg (876.31 KiB) Viewed 276 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Lowpe »

Five days till the invasion of Sitkin.

Image
Attachments
witpae.jpg
witpae.jpg (583.98 KiB) Viewed 276 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Lowpe »

October 26, 1942

Bombardments in the Aleutians net another 15 or so American planes destroyed, plus damage to the ground troops. Japan has now achieved over a 400 VP margin in the plane loss category.

Looks like three more days for the invasion of Great Sitkin, and now all the mines are swept. 70 fighters at Adak, and only 52 now at Unmak.

The naval bombardments have now branched out to hit every American base daily except Adak, and two more battleships have arrived to throw their weight around. The Iboat fleet is providing deep naval search, while Nells and Bettys cover closer to prevent surprises.

The KB is quiet, content to let the naval bombardments attrit the American planes, but is watching over everything.

User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2598
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by CaptBeefheart »

I finally caught up in this AAR. As an AFB, it breaks my heart. Well played. A good example of how the timing of your offensive actions is crucial.

Cheers,
CB
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: CaptBeefheart

I finally caught up in this AAR. As an AFB, it breaks my heart. Well played. A good example of how the timing of your offensive actions is crucial.

Cheers,
CB

Thanks Cap!

Another day down, more bombardments in the great north, invasions fleets one more day closer. Allies now have 100 fighters at Adak, 90 at Umnak (and more mines there).

Yamato is back on station, but I can't figure out how to use her yet except as a reserve fleet.

Shifting some bombers around in China, Kweiyang held but just because of the forts. Attacking again, and then the road is clear for the final push on Chungking and Kunming. Kunming, Tsu and Pao are getting their runways bombed.

Added some fighter bombers to Burma...hopefully they can knock out the exposed British armor units. Have to be careful not to fly into the excellent British AA.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Lowpe »

More carnage...almost. This is a great sub trap I have going on the Americans. What great intelligence!

Image
Attachments
witpae.jpg
witpae.jpg (314.49 KiB) Viewed 276 times
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by obvert »

Which way were they going?
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Lowpe »

The bombardments are furious, Unmak is now at 100% damage, and the Allies have built the fighter force back to 150 at Adak.

Japan is even using the three training light cruisers as a bombardment task force. They do pretty well.

Invasion starts tomorrow.

Image
Attachments
witp5.jpg
witp5.jpg (273.72 KiB) Viewed 284 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: obvert

Which way were they going?

I believe east...there is another small BB fleet at Cold, but it has been there for days. I just need to gas up the KB and get into the interior.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Lowpe »

So, here we are, the end of October 1942, and the Aleutians are about to get a series of nasty naval invasions, while the Allies try to put pressure on Burma, but rather are getting beaten there as well. The Allies risk losing another 40-60 ground units depending upon what Japan does.

The Yorktown is somewhere from Seattle to Cold Bay, along with one fast battleship and many heavy cruisers. Two other carriers might be trapped or scuttled or in for repairs.

The last roadblock to Chungking from the south is about to be blown away, and the Chungking garrison once over 9k AV has been cut down to 6.7K.

Ceylon, and Port Moresby have fallen as well. Early Allied advance into Tabby in South Pacific cost a full Marine Division, and two more divisions were lost at Attu. At Ceylon the Aussies lost two brigades and the British quite a few units as well.

The Allied Air Force has to be in tatters, the best frames heavily attrited mostly by naval bombardments.

To this situations, the admirable Wargamr has asked for a tactical pause to reflect.

User avatar
Bif1961
Posts: 2014
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:52 pm
Location: Phenix City, Alabama

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Bif1961 »

I hope he continues as his best days are ahead of him.
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Canoerebel »

Offer to accidentally trigger Russia?
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Lowpe »

I have a rule, only one painful game at a time.[;)]
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Lowpe »

End of October, 1942

Kweiyang falls...with the bulk of the IJA artillery and infantry divisions in the two hexes immediately to the south (and they are moving north.

The road is open all the way the Chungking...some of the most important hexes to garrison are empty or already in Japanese control. Raw AV of Chungking is now down to 6.5K and continues to plummet.

Armored units and one infantry division will continue to push west to Kunming.

Image
Attachments
witpae.jpg
witpae.jpg (346.33 KiB) Viewed 282 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Lowpe »

Invasion tomorrow...



Image
Attachments
witpae.jpg
witpae.jpg (82.29 KiB) Viewed 282 times
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16045
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Mike Solli »

Kweiyang is a nice airbase for use against Chungking.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Post by Lowpe »

Ichang is a size 8 runway, and that is where the almost all bombers are stationed hitting Chungking now. Easier to get an Air HQ there quite early. Previous to today, Japanese bombers were targeting Kweiyang.

Neikiang, 2 hexes away, is only size 2 (48%), and hosts a big sentai of Nick FB's doing nothing but LRCAP (with drop tanks) over Chungking should the Allies decide to fly in supplies.

Kweiyang is a size 3, and I will air lift in engineers and aviation units to it to build it up. There are a ton of engineers being airlifted from Canton to points north. Leap frogging.

I am probably 10 days away from the first deliberate attack on Chungking.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”