Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post new mods and scenarios here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

User avatar
KC45
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2017 8:35 pm
Location: JPN

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by KC45 »

Large amount of requests

service ceiling of F-15
F-15 and the variant have 60000ft service ceiling. (45000 for now)
https://www.airforce-technology.com/pro ... -aircraft/
https://www.pearlharboraviationmuseum.o ... e-fighter/
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/fighter/f15/

F-35A (Air Force,2020,DBID#4223) for Japan
GBU-39 SDB1 (Expect same loadout of USA’s F-35A of 2019’s)
http://www.mod.go.jp/atla/souhon/supply ... ndex3.html
The reference is from the deals of Japanese military made, not much English resources.
https://www.militaryaerospace.com/artic ... tions.html (English resources I found, no detailed info)

F-35A (Japan,2021)
JSM (Joint Strike Missiles, expect same loadout of Norway F-35)
http://www.mod.go.jp/e/d_budget/pdf/300914.pdf (Reference of JSM/Defense Related Budget Request for JFY2019) The year is based on Norway’s. Might be change.


F-35B(Air Force) for Japan (around 2021?)
AIM-120C-7, GBU-39 SDB, GBU-12 and GBU-31 -Same as F-35A(Japan)
https://www.defensenews.com/air/2018/12 ... nificance/
Still unknown about F-35B can equip JSM or not.

Confirmed F-15J with JASSM, but no details. The improvement will contain adding improved Electronic Warfare equipment, increasing weapon mount… etc. I’ll keep watching.


I need Removal of "Probe Refueling" properties from Japanse F-4EJkai.
There is no refernce showing Japanse F-4EJkai have the air refueling ability, Japan remove it because of the style of the military.
This is important for modern air warfare withoute air refueling system, it change the game balance of scenario.
DB#1996 F-4EJ kai
DB#136 F-4EJ kai
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell ... tors#Japan
Wargame is fun if war is unreal
User avatar
KC45
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2017 8:35 pm
Location: JPN

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by KC45 »

Japanese Satellite
I’ll request Japanese Information Gathering Satellite, for simulating more realistic warfare for scenario.

http://www.astronautix.com/i/igs.html
IGS-1A/B,IGS-3A,IGS-4A/B,IGS-5A,IGS-6A.IGS-7A,IGS-8A/B,IGS-9A,IGS O-5/R-5,IGS O-6/R-6

IGS O-6
https://www.n2yo.com/satellite/?s=43223
IGS R-6
https://www.n2yo.com/satellite/?s=43495

Additional Information
IGS-1A :(2003-2008)EO/IR Satellite but not greate Optical resolution, Expect Early 1990 technology. http://www.asahi.com/special/nuclear/TK ... 70230.html (Japanese Reference that explaining bad resolution)

According to Japanese wikipedia, 1st and 2nd Generation SAR satellite has L-band SAR. Not sure about later Generation SAR but assume they are I band.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informati ... _Satellite (The list of satellite in wikipedia)
I don’t mind about you use NORAD or JPN gov destination.
Wargame is fun if war is unreal
User avatar
KC45
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2017 8:35 pm
Location: JPN

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by KC45 »

They are high speed boat, so players might get hard to identify missile boats and this. Also the these ships can give some change in convoy mission.
https://www.incat.com.au/wp-content/upl ... ossier.pdf (7th page)

Boeing 929 (High speed, hydrofoil boat) Commercial/civilian hydrofoil boat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_929
http://www.boeing.com/history/products/ ... hydro.html


HSC Condor Rapide (Hull 045)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSC_Condor_Rapide (wiki)
https://www.incat.com.au/wp-content/upl ... i-spec.pdf (Official, lack of the displacement?)

HSC Natchan World (Hull 065)
This one is so important for my scenario, Japan decided use this ship during war for convoy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSC_Natchan_World
https://www.incat.com.au/wp-content/upl ... i-spec.pdf
http://jsw.newpacificinstitute.org/?p=8758 (the news of Japan use this ship for national defence)
Wargame is fun if war is unreal
User avatar
KC45
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2017 8:35 pm
Location: JPN

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by KC45 »

PG 824 Hayabusa (DB1335)
Hayabusa class craft lack ESM system, but it is important to detect hostile unit by ESM without emit any radar, so I request those sensors.

Sensors/EW
(ADD)
Model:1x NOLR-9B /Max Range:500nm /Notes:ELINT /Abilities: Late 1990 Technology, Air Search, Surface Search, OTH(Surface Wave), Specific Emitter ID

Model:1x OAX-2 /Max Range: around 100 nm? /Notes:Infrared /Abilities:Infrared, 3rd Generation Imaging Technology, Air Search, Surface Search, Ground Search(fixed), Ground Search(mobile), Heading Info (No Weapon Director system)

Model:1x J/OPS-20C (Same as the radar that “DD 115 Akizuki(DB2293)” has)

Model:1x J/OPS-18-3 (Same as the J/OPS-18-1 radar that “DD 122 Hatsuyuki(DB1746)” has, but the technology should be late 1990’s)

(Remove)
Madel:1x J/OPS-28C

and... I also request for adding dock for this ship. small dock for RHIB.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayabusa- ... atrol_boat

http://www.vspg.net/jmsdf/pg824.html (Japanese reference)
Wargame is fun if war is unreal
Ancalagon451
Posts: 330
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2018 9:04 am

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Ancalagon451 »

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26 ... ercarriers

Not sure to what exent CATs have been included in the DB but, if this is true, then the relevant units will have to be updated.

Ancalagon
rmunie0613
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 7:41 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by rmunie0613 »

2 Requests for next database

1- Any chance to get a weapon record added to the db3k for RIM 156A SM2ER Block IVA with the IR backup? It is a cancelled weapon system, but is in the database already, but there is no way to actually use it as there are no weapon records involving it.

2- Any chance to add cargo capacity to the Cargo ships such as the RoRos prepositioned at Diego Garcia?

Thanks in advance!
R
anlgzl
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:55 am

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by anlgzl »

Hi,

Do you have any plan to add ;

1) TCG Anadolu (L-408) amphibious assault ship (LHD) for Turkish Navy.
2) HÜRKUŞ-C LIGHT ATTACK/ARMED RECONNAISSANCE AIRCRAFT for Turkish Air Force.
orca
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by orca »

Can you add- JSOW-ER

“The U.S. Navy says it will begin deploying a cruise missile derivative of the stealthy AGM-154 Joint Stand-Off Weapon glide bomb, or JSOW, no later than the end of 2023, as an option for its F/A-18E/F Super Hornets and F-35C Joint Strike Fighters.”

Can you add to loadout for F/A-18’s and F-35?


DB details:
Add Williams International WJ24-8 turbojet - so same speed as ADM-160 MALD
Add 2 way datalink and CEC
Include IR guidance
Otherwise the same as JSOW [AGM-154]C-1 block 3


http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26 ... side-f-35c
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20 ... re-capable
BDukes
Posts: 2724
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BDukes »

Please note Indian Rajput updates

4 Bramos launcher (instead of Styx and Bramos mix of prior versions)

Picture

https://twitter.com/CavasShips/status/1 ... 7556213761

Thank!
"Smart people just shrug and admit they're dazed and confused. The only ones left with any confidence at all are the New Dumb". HST
BDukes
Posts: 2724
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BDukes »

Consider add hardened mounts for Israeli Arrow Sites?

Picture

https://twitter.com/reutersanders/statu ... 2321413121
"Smart people just shrug and admit they're dazed and confused. The only ones left with any confidence at all are the New Dumb". HST
User avatar
Clockmaster77
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:22 pm
Location: near Rome, Italy

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Clockmaster77 »

Consider to add this wonderful hypothetical plane:
Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow

Technical data available at this link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Canada_CF-105_Arrow

Ok, it has never entered service, but the 5 prototypes has demonstrated great performances. It would be an exceptional entry for hypothetical cold-war era scenarios. Please... [&o]
"History is the only discipline that is studied not to be repeated."
User avatar
Schr75
Posts: 878
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:14 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Schr75 »

ORIGINAL: Clockmaster77

Consider to add this wonderful hypothetical plane:
Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow

Technical data available at this link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Canada_CF-105_Arrow

Ok, it has never entered service, but the 5 prototypes has demonstrated great performances. It would be an exceptional entry for hypothetical cold-war era scenarios. Please... [&o]

Hi Clockmaster

Check out CWDB entry # 3114 and # 3489.
I think you will be pleasantly surprised[:D]

Søren
User avatar
Clockmaster77
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:22 pm
Location: near Rome, Italy

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Clockmaster77 »

what a gaffe... I didn't check in the CWDB... [:D][:D][:D]
"History is the only discipline that is studied not to be repeated."
User avatar
KLAB
Posts: 507
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:24 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by KLAB »

ORIGINAL: Clockmaster77

what a gaffe... I didn't check in the CWDB... [:D][:D][:D]
It would still be a nice addition to the DB3K given that had it entered service the performance was good enough for it still to be an effective platform well into the millennia,
Arrow with AMRAAM?
K
User avatar
cdnice
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:17 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by cdnice »

Image
User avatar
Clockmaster77
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:22 pm
Location: near Rome, Italy

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Clockmaster77 »

I Know that Project, its fantastic, but it is not an hypothetical real unit but a fictional one.
Bye
"History is the only discipline that is studied not to be repeated."
User avatar
KLAB
Posts: 507
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:24 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by KLAB »

For consideration of amending the range and designation of the 9M96.
Via Google translate so make of it what you will but the text is from an RG / Russian MOD again referring to what appears to be the 9M96M with a range of 150km not the earlier 120km of the 9M96. Given the development time of the 9M96 it makes sense that it has skipped to the modernised extended range variant before even entering service.
And as it's only just been type certified Gorshkovs in service date could be put to 2019?
https://rg.ru/sila/
https://rg.ru/2019/02/11/gosispytaniia- ... sheny.html
11.02.2019  
3:15 am
State tests of the shipborne air defense system "Polyment-Redut" completed. RIA News.

RIA News Photo: Pavel Lvov / RIA News
Completed state tests of the Polimen-Redut anti-aircraft missile system for frigates of Project 22350.

This was announced by the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy, Admiral Vladimir Korolev, speaking at the assembly of the St. Petersburg Maritime Assembly, the newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda writes .

Photo: Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Earlier, in November, the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation, Sergei Shoigu, spoke about the conduct of more than ten launches of Polyment-Redut missiles on various types of targets during state tests in the Northern Fleet. According to him, the capabilities of the air defense system make it possible to hit any existing and promising means of air attack.

"Polyment-Redut" - an anti-aircraft missile system of the sea-based with the installation of a vertical launch for the Navy of Russia. Able to hit air targets within a radius of 150 and at an altitude of up to 30 kilometers.

The first frigate of the project 22350 “Admiral Gorshkov”, equipped with the “Polyment-Redut” air defense system, joined the Russian Navy in July 2018. It is expected that the second ship of this type - the " Admiral Kasatonov " - will be commissioned before the end of 2019.

Thanks for considering
K
User avatar
Clockmaster77
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:22 pm
Location: near Rome, Italy

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Clockmaster77 »

Battleship Novorossiysk (1949-1955).
Just... please think about that glorious ship, used as a training ship in the Soviet Navy (1949-55).
It was completed in 1914 for the Kingdom of Italy as "Giulio Cesare". Recommissioned/modified in 1937 (it served in Royal Italian Navy in WWII). Then it was sell to Soviet Union in 1949 to pay part of Italian War Debts towards Soviet Union.
The ship was armed with a main battery of thirteen 305 mm/46 Model 1909 guns in three triple-gun turret and two twin-gun turrets. The secondary battery comprised eighteen 120 mm (4.7 in) guns, all mounted the sides of the hull. Giulio Cesare was also armed with fourteen 76 mm (3.0 in) guns. She was equipped with three submerged 450 mm (17.7 in) torpedo tubes. The belt armor was 250 mm thick.
After the end of World War I, the number of 50-caliber 76 mm guns was reduced to 13, mounted on the turret tops, and six new 40-caliber 76 mm anti-aircraft (AA) guns were installed abreast the aft funnel. In addition two license-built 2-pounder AA guns were mounted on the forecastle deck.
When she was sell to Soviet Union all Italian light AA guns were replaced by eighteen 37 mm 70-K AA guns in six twin mounts and six singles. Soviet Union wants to replace her with Soviet built 305 mm guns, but the ship sunk in 1955.

It would be great in some mine sweep scenario in the early cold war era: it was sunk by a German WWII mine in Sevastopol in 1955, with the tragical loss of 608 sailors. But some uncontrolled rumors says that a group of italian navy veteran frogmen sabotaged the ship for retaliation: and this is great for a Scenario! If the developers will add this Ship (and perhaps some post wwII italian MAS vehicles) I promise I'll create a scenario about this highly fictional interpretation [;)]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_b ... lio_Cesare

https://www.revolvy.com/page/Italian-ba ... lio-Cesare

Goodbye!

"History is the only discipline that is studied not to be repeated."
TheOriginalOverlord
Posts: 337
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Marines

RE: US Army / USMC Units

Post by TheOriginalOverlord »

ORIGINAL: TheOriginalOverlord

ORIGINAL: TheOriginalOverlord

Could we get the USS Des Moines 1957 from CWDB put in here along with a "hypothetical" version with late 80s upgrades like this?

Des Moines class late 80's upgrade...4 x CIWS (white) 4 x Mk141 quad (yellow) 2x quad ABL tomahawk (red) Figure in new radars and ECM same as the Iowas etc... an Iowa "lite" if you will

Image

Thanks!

ORIGINAL: TheOriginalOverlord

Noticed "US" F-4D and Es (and also J/S models) in the 80s are still equipped with AIM9Js and AIM7E/Fs. Wouldn't the 80s loadouts have the 9L/Ms and 7Ms(Ps)?


RAF FG.1s already have 9Ls etc..

thanks for any update to those..


bump...
bump...
Semper Fi!

Jeremy

Image
BDukes
Posts: 2724
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: US Army / USMC Units

Post by BDukes »

Updates for HIMARS launchers (Sources Sipri arms databases and link belows)

Add Jordan (2012-2014) x12.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdNJaqa3eyM

Singapore 2010-2011 x18

https://www.army.mil/article/66233/sing ... g_ceremony

Polish Purchase x20

https://missilethreat.csis.org/poland-t ... se-himars/

https://defence-blog.com/army/poland-us ... chers.html

Thank!

"Smart people just shrug and admit they're dazed and confused. The only ones left with any confidence at all are the New Dumb". HST
Locked

Return to “Mods and Scenarios”