ORIGINAL: Chliperic
Interested, of course. Now, I feel it will be difficult to include such events when the railroad is mostly a jumplink with an oof-map box and railroads are repaired in 15 days in the AGE engine. But I will take all ideas and doc of course.
ORIGINAL: Keke
ORIGINAL: Chliperic
Interested, of course. Now, I feel it will be difficult to include such events when the railroad is mostly a jumplink with an oof-map box and railroads are repaired in 15 days in the AGE engine. But I will take all ideas and doc of course.
It would slow Allied troops significantly if the railroad at Segezha was destroyed...
Below is the map of historical Allied advancement. My editing is in red.
Compatible with ongoing games, if it works.[:D]
ORIGINAL: Chliperic
ORIGINAL: Nikel
I have been searching for a japanese order of battle in Siberia, but without luck [:(]
The official RUS OOB is very solid. I have not real infos about Japan, so I'm just releasing Japanese troops present on the map and creating new Japanese divisions to guard the Transsiberian; These latter have never been engaged in RCW, so it's pure conjoncture. I supppose Japanese divisions to be taher built on the same model in 1919, but during WW2 Japan had very different OOBs between divisions, in part because of experiment and specialization. I wonder if it was yet the case in 1919...No clue about.
ORIGINAL: Nikel
ORIGINAL: Chliperic
ORIGINAL: Nikel
I have been searching for a japanese order of battle in Siberia, but without luck [:(]
The official RUS OOB is very solid. I have not real infos about Japan, so I'm just releasing Japanese troops present on the map and creating new Japanese divisions to guard the Transsiberian; These latter have never been engaged in RCW, so it's pure conjoncture. I supppose Japanese divisions to be taher built on the same model in 1919, but during WW2 Japan had very different OOBs between divisions, in part because of experiment and specialization. I wonder if it was yet the case in 1919...No clue about.
I comment this because there are no japanese cavalry units in the game, and there are several pics where cavalry is present.
An idea, just in case you are interested [;)], would be to use the divisional organization of the japanese forces in the russo-japanese war, I guess it was not very different. Look that for example the 12th division had a cavalry regiment attached
http://www.cgsc.edu/CARL/nafziger/904JHAA.pdf
This site looks a translation of the japanese wikipedia
data.lullar.com/剣兵団
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%AC%AC1 ... %E8%BB%8D)
For the pic, the unit in PON in 1890 looks nice
ORIGINAL: Nikel
Copyright? I can ask for permission if you want, there should be no problem [:)]
ORIGINAL: Keke
I played one more turn with updated version and there were no problems, so far. It's late December '18 now.
My question: Is full Allied intervention required to save the front in the long run? The reason I ask is that the AIL has been 12 for a couple of turns, and now I have enough EPs to try diplomatic effort while EPs won't go under 6 (which presumably causes other problems). Clovis?
ORIGINAL: Chliperic
ORIGINAL: Nikel
Copyright? I can ask for permission if you want, there should be no problem [:)]
I will never use copyrighted material in FY or SVF. Easier, simpler, safer [:)]
ORIGINAL: MikeKO
Thanks for your good work! For the Japanese Intervention option, I understand the chance is a one-time 15% each of the next 4 turns, and the negative kick in immediately even if it turns out the Japanese decline?
Yes that's something I've noticed in some saves and I have yet found why. I will need the next time the save and the backup1 turn to search why. The save must be the one of the Poland MC of the region. [&o]ORIGINAL: Keke
This doesn't look right:
