ORIGINAL: elmo3
ORIGINAL: Oleg Mastruko
Good question. I did evacuate couple of factories. But "production issues" is not only factories. My resource (and population) base is shattered, and I don't want to spend supplies and (mental) energy rebuilding reconquered resources only to have them destroyed by Germans - again (Caucasus is good example - German can re-enter there anytime if he really wants to).
O.
Looking at the game map above I'd say historically the Soviets lost as much or more territory than you have, with the exception of Moscow of course. Yet by 1944 they were easily outproducing the Germans and had no shortage of soldiers. Obviously I don't know the game mechanics so maybe it's just a case of you doing things differently than Stalin. But if the Soviets can't replicate their historical production capabilities by moving factories east then that is a problem IMO.
They never lost the oilfields in the Caucasus. That is a huge difference. And in this game, the Russian player can repair his resources once he gets them back, but it takes supplies. The Russian player has been rightfully worried that if he repaired the facilities, the Germans would just come back in and destroy them. You'll see as the Russian player retakes areas like Moscow, Caucusus and Rostov, and feels confident he can hold them, he'll get his resources up high again (using lend leased supplies). As in the real war, as the Russians move west, they will just get stronger. If the Germans were able to hold the A-A line, the Soviets would be hard pressed to keep all their factories functioning (assuming they were move east) as they would have been historically.











