TopEverest vs Admiral Kamikaze - the rematch

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

AP plan

Post by topeverest »

Here is the updated corps divisions and brigades.

Current plan is to keep building infantry corps throughout the mud season (3 more turns). (18 more)



Image
Attachments
777.jpg
777.jpg (25.78 KiB) Viewed 479 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Map

Post by topeverest »

Here is the updated map for the summer campaign. Note the front locations show some of the major reorganization I need to do.



Image
Attachments
3333.jpg
3333.jpg (1.42 MiB) Viewed 479 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Strentgth Update

Post by topeverest »

If I haven't said it before, this is very helpful feedback. If only I could learn as fast as you can teach!
ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

Everything in this AAR is pretty darn good except for one thing, the execution.

The Lake Ladoga offensive. I assume that Leningrad is a part of this, otherwise one can only guess what strategic objective is. You sent your cavalry corps off to support an attack where you don't have much in the way of rifle corps. If you intend to take Leningrad, you will want to have at least one rifle army of guards corps just for that task.

The failure at Orel was a given. Tank corps left unsupported by infantry, cavalry or mechanized formations are easy wins for the Germans. Historically, Soviet tank corps were often hammered by the Germans because of the lack of supporting units in these corps. They were effectively just a blob of tanks, and tanks without infantry support do not fare well. It goes towards the whole concept of combined arms action. If those cavalry corps you sent off to the Ladoga action had been in the same hexes as the tank corps, you would have been better off. It also demonstrates why you want to focus heavily on getting those cavalry corps to guards. They get better movement rates in enemy territory and ergo can better support your tank corps as they exploit the gaps that are created by rifle corps assaults. Now in November the tank corps finally get the upgrade they so badly need and become less reliant on cavalry and mechanized support, but you're not quite there yet.

The Boguchar-Belgorod Offensive will be somewhat hampered buy the fact that you will not have good supply there as you do not have a functional rail line in the immediate vicinity. It too appears to have a tank corps component but again no cavalry.

The Don-Donets sector is a depressing sight. Guards rifle corps near Rostov just wasting away, apparent assaults across major rivers with no real strategic goal, no exploitation forces slightly behind the lines so as not to suffer from fatigue are the more obvious shortcomings.

You are certainly still in a position to win the game, but the clock is now ticking. You can't afford to see these breakthrough attempts thrown back at this stage. Focus on the basics.

Identify where you need to get to.

Identify what you need to get you there.

To push along your important routes, you need guards rifle corps with sappers for the initial attack. Here is where the artillery and rocket on map units are the biggest help.

When the enemy retreats, send in the IL-2s for additional losses. Hit them again with another infantry or cavalry-tank attack, force them to retreat again.

When the enemy retreats again, bomb them again. The German rifle division cannot stand up to this sort of treatment indefinitely. Push in your cavalry-tank forces and hit them again if you can...and so on.

Once all this seems logical, you'll be solid in any future games.





Andy M
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4866
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: Strentgth Update

Post by M60A3TTS »

Anything more on this game?
ericv
Posts: 325
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 8:44 pm

RE: Turn 2 Center

Post by ericv »

your harsh words must have scared him away
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4866
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: Turn 2 Center

Post by M60A3TTS »

I could have said everything was hunky dorey, but then I'd have been lying and he wouldn't learn as much. [:)]
ericv
Posts: 325
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 8:44 pm

RE: Turn 2 Center

Post by ericv »

true. :-)
charlie0311
Posts: 940
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 11:15 am

RE: Turn 2 Center

Post by charlie0311 »

Fearing the mighty m-60 his opponent has bailed, ???
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Turn 2 Center

Post by topeverest »

NO worries. I enjoy the opportunity to learn - and I have soooo much to learn.

I have been head-down working but making slow progress on the game. Following is the update for end of 43
ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

I could have said everything was hunky dorey, but then I'd have been lying and he wouldn't learn as much. [:)]
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Turn 133 End of 1943

Post by topeverest »

Last we heard I was limping along trying to learn the Ruskies. Following is the update as of end of 1943

1. Russians reach lake Ladoga and push to sortavala Finland. offensive ends, and troops move to Moscow offensive
2. Russians stopped 2 hexes short of Volkov and end offensive - push units to Moscow offensive
3. Russians Turn west in their attack from Tula, and force Germany to withdrawal 30-80 miles and establish a new front supported by armor to the west
4. Russians drive west from Voronezh and reach Oskol river, began pushing across. Russians 6-7 hexes from Kharkov (though not specifically driving straight there
5. Main Russian effort driving SW towards the Donets NW of Stalino complex and should arrive there by late January
6. Russian attack to retake Moscow starts next turn. The odds look good, as the defenses have been stripped to bolster other waning fonts. 3 armor, 4 cavalry, and 10 infantry armies are in the effort
7. Russian continue to build corps with APs
8. As a player, I still am trying to find the best Russian blitz formula

Overall, I would suggest that my progress has been poor to modest over the last 8 turns, gaining an average of one hex per turn in my main attack.


Image
Attachments
1111.jpg
1111.jpg (33.8 KiB) Viewed 479 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Strategic Situation

Post by topeverest »

Here is the Map update since the last post.

I have been fiddling around with attack constructs and it seems that a more productive attack is guard infantry first wave, guard army infantry second wave and armor / cav / mech third wave. Still testing of course.



Image
Attachments
654.jpg
654.jpg (1.2 MiB) Viewed 479 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Air losses

Post by topeverest »

Air ceased being a problem.



Image
Attachments
766.jpg
766.jpg (227.14 KiB) Viewed 479 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Ground losses and AFV production

Post by topeverest »

All is good here too.

If I had enough trucks, Id build more armor...but I don't.



Image
Attachments
887.jpg
887.jpg (255.48 KiB) Viewed 479 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Industry

Post by topeverest »

Looks good here too.

74K excess manpower and 2.5M armaments



Image
Attachments
444.jpg
444.jpg (134 KiB) Viewed 479 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Corps

Post by topeverest »

Here is the steady progress on corps/

Note no artillery divisions built yet. At maximum guards for year of course.

Plan is to keep heavy emphasis on INF / CAV corps creation and monitor trucks.



Image
Attachments
55t6.jpg
55t6.jpg (172.35 KiB) Viewed 479 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Force disposition

Post by topeverest »

xxxx



Image
Attachments
11122.jpg
11122.jpg (309.53 KiB) Viewed 480 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Turn 135 an 13, 1944

Post by topeverest »

Trucks 136 (177) Blizzard 10

Over the first two turns of 1944:
1. transcaucuses front attack 4 hex defense stand --- north side of lake ladoga after a long slosh to the Finnish line. One hex taken two others reduced
2. Moscow attack had surprising early success, punching 3 holes across the attack zone. Enemy pulls back 2-3 hexes and no substantive attacking occurs in next turn. Reds are now adjacent to Moscow hex
3. Minor holding attack SE of Orel making one hex per turn or less on a 30 mile front. 3 hexes to city
4. Attacking due west towards Belgorod and Kharkov against heavy resistance. Slow progress. main effect is to hold down strong troops
5. Main attack SW across Krasnaya river north of Donets consistent with the main thrust. Pincer attack to south and across donets fails to close entirely shut
6. Attacking due west to Mius river / Tangarog stead progress and grinding many enemy units

Image
Attachments
555.jpg
555.jpg (20.2 KiB) Viewed 479 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Stalino Complex View

Post by topeverest »

Here is the Stalino Complex

note the ground down enemy units around Stalino. First Shattered Enemy Unit this past turn and more routes each turn



Image
Attachments
444333.jpg
444333.jpg (601.63 KiB) Viewed 479 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Moscow

Post by topeverest »

This will be a slog unless I get smart in blitzing.



Image
Attachments
1122.jpg
1122.jpg (410.65 KiB) Viewed 481 times
Andy M
User avatar
STEF78
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:22 pm
Location: Versailles, France

RE: Moscow

Post by STEF78 »

Did you disband 3 cav corps? and if so why?
25 tank corps and only 18k AFV, do you lack some types of tanks? Or don't you build tank regiments?
GHC 9-0-3
SHC 10-0-4
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”