Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Australia and Perth 1 hex away near Madang and didn't react...pity. There is always tomorrow.



Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (222.57 KiB) Viewed 468 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Interesting ambush being set up here...the IJN task force got here late in the day so probably isn't done offloading.



Image

Pre-Invasion action off Jesselton (68,86)

6 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
DD Hatsuyuki
APD Nadakaze

Japanese ground losses:
7 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
10 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

DD Hatsuyuki firing at 108th RN Base Force
Defensive Guns fire at approaching troops in landing craft at 5,000 yards
Defensive Guns fire at approaching troops in landing craft at 2,000 yards


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphibious Assault at Jesselton (68,86)

TF 197 troops unloading over beach at Jesselton, 68,86

15 Support troops accidentally lost during unload of 24th JAAF AF Bn /5
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (120.87 KiB) Viewed 468 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

There is at least one AV here too...

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Jesselton at 68,86

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 16 NM, estimated altitude 5,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes

Japanese aircraft
E13A1 Jake x 3
F1M2 Pete x 5

Allied aircraft
OS2U-3 Kingfisher x 2

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
OS2U-3 Kingfisher: 2 damaged

Japanese Ships
xAK Tamaki Maru

Aircraft Attacking:
2 x OS2U-3 Kingfisher bombing from 1000 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 250 lb SAP Bomb

CAP engaged:
Kamikawa Maru-1 with F1M2 Pete (1 airborne, 4 on standby, 0 scrambling)
1 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 5000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 7 minutes
Kamikawa Maru-2 with E13A1 Jake (3 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
3 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 6000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 6000.
Raid is overhead
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Lost my first Kingfisher today and another Skytrain. Gosh, those are fragile planes.



Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (156.99 KiB) Viewed 468 times
User avatar
Encircled
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Northern England

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Encircled »

He's going to have some backfilling to do, whatever happens!
Evoken
Posts: 496
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 1:51 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Evoken »

Wasnt there supposed to be engagement at Wake this turn , did IJN pull back ?

Edit: Nevermind found the answer it was posted ,indeed they pulled back
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: Evoken

Wasnt there supposed to be engagement at Wake this turn , did IJN pull back ?

Edit: Nevermind found the answer it was posted ,indeed they pulled back

I pushed forward to see if could catch him staging...no joy.

He has pulled back a couple of times previously, like this. On the ground, he is super aggressive with his troops and likes shock attacks even with tired troops.

I managed to pick up 15 VPs worth of destroyed IJ ground forces yesterday.[:)]




Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (381.44 KiB) Viewed 468 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

The last of the Thundering Herd makes their escape...



Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (291.71 KiB) Viewed 468 times
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20312
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

I think Asheville is the PG with a couple of 6" guns - useful for bombardment or taking out enemy small fry.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Okay turn is away, and we have three separate solid naval intercepts and one potential naval air attack...but other than that it is all Japan right now![;)]

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

I think Asheville is the PG with a couple of 6" guns - useful for bombardment or taking out enemy small fry.

Shows 4" in this mod.
ushakov
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2017 1:51 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by ushakov »

I believe BBfanboy may be thinking of the Charleston?
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Alfred »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Okay turn is away, and we have three separate solid naval intercepts and one potential naval air attack...but other than that it is all Japan right now![;)]


Do you mean by that, that you have created 3 separate transport TFs each comprised of only merchantmen and you are sending them directly to a Japanese port which displays an enemy TF icon present, or to the ocean hex which displays an enemy TF icon?[:)]

If you keep sending single xAK TFs to enemy ports, the enemy combat TFs may never have sufficient OPS/ammo to leave port after combat. That's one way to keep your valuable combat TFs safe from naval intercepts.[;)]

Alfred
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20312
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: ushakov

I believe BBfanboy may be thinking of the Charleston?
My bad- Charleston is the one with 6" guns. Old guy memory - or lack thereof ...[:(]
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Got the turn...from Japan secret communication...haven't run the turn yet:



Ouch, I can see why you were excited about that turn.

Another turn like this and you will have to change your title on your AAR :-)

User avatar
821Bobo
Posts: 2412
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:20 pm
Location: Slovakia

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by 821Bobo »

mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by mind_messing »

ORIGINAL: Alfred

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Okay turn is away, and we have three separate solid naval intercepts and one potential naval air attack...but other than that it is all Japan right now![;)]


Do you mean by that, that you have created 3 separate transport TFs each comprised of only merchantmen and you are sending them directly to a Japanese port which displays an enemy TF icon present, or to the ocean hex which displays an enemy TF icon?[:)]

If you keep sending single xAK TFs to enemy ports, the enemy combat TFs may never have sufficient OPS/ammo to leave port after combat. That's one way to keep your valuable combat TFs safe from naval intercepts.[;)]

Alfred

Also a useful tactic offensively as chaff in major fleet engagements - IJN DD's seem to love expending Long Lances on freighters. Much more comforting fighting IJN ships knowing the big damage dealers have been expended.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

New Years Eve, 1941

A three destroyer squadron intercepts a juicy task force at Jesselton, gets a torpedo hit that fails to detonate, and the IJN craftily manages to withdraw for now...



Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (97.14 KiB) Viewed 467 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

TF Australia reacts to and pursues the IJN fleet...catching it, closing the Perth damages the patrol boat escorts that managed to bounce a shell of her deck armor, then the Australia sinks two ships before the IJN manage to escape...

No time to rescue soldiers in the water...we need another engagement!

Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (294.42 KiB) Viewed 467 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

This convoy manages to break away again...only 7 more lives left.

Image
Attachments
animatedarmorimage.jpg
animatedarmorimage.jpg (264.91 KiB) Viewed 467 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”