
Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Australia and Perth 1 hex away near Madang and didn't react...pity. There is always tomorrow.


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (222.57 KiB) Viewed 468 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Interesting ambush being set up here...the IJN task force got here late in the day so probably isn't done offloading.

Pre-Invasion action off Jesselton (68,86)
6 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Japanese Ships
DD Hatsuyuki
APD Nadakaze
Japanese ground losses:
7 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Allied ground losses:
10 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
DD Hatsuyuki firing at 108th RN Base Force
Defensive Guns fire at approaching troops in landing craft at 5,000 yards
Defensive Guns fire at approaching troops in landing craft at 2,000 yards
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphibious Assault at Jesselton (68,86)
TF 197 troops unloading over beach at Jesselton, 68,86
15 Support troops accidentally lost during unload of 24th JAAF AF Bn /5

Pre-Invasion action off Jesselton (68,86)
6 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Japanese Ships
DD Hatsuyuki
APD Nadakaze
Japanese ground losses:
7 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Allied ground losses:
10 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
DD Hatsuyuki firing at 108th RN Base Force
Defensive Guns fire at approaching troops in landing craft at 5,000 yards
Defensive Guns fire at approaching troops in landing craft at 2,000 yards
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphibious Assault at Jesselton (68,86)
TF 197 troops unloading over beach at Jesselton, 68,86
15 Support troops accidentally lost during unload of 24th JAAF AF Bn /5
- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (120.87 KiB) Viewed 468 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
There is at least one AV here too...
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Jesselton at 68,86
Weather in hex: Overcast
Raid spotted at 16 NM, estimated altitude 5,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes
Japanese aircraft
E13A1 Jake x 3
F1M2 Pete x 5
Allied aircraft
OS2U-3 Kingfisher x 2
No Japanese losses
Allied aircraft losses
OS2U-3 Kingfisher: 2 damaged
Japanese Ships
xAK Tamaki Maru
Aircraft Attacking:
2 x OS2U-3 Kingfisher bombing from 1000 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 250 lb SAP Bomb
CAP engaged:
Kamikawa Maru-1 with F1M2 Pete (1 airborne, 4 on standby, 0 scrambling)
1 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 5000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 7 minutes
Kamikawa Maru-2 with E13A1 Jake (3 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
3 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 6000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 6000.
Raid is overhead
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Jesselton at 68,86
Weather in hex: Overcast
Raid spotted at 16 NM, estimated altitude 5,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes
Japanese aircraft
E13A1 Jake x 3
F1M2 Pete x 5
Allied aircraft
OS2U-3 Kingfisher x 2
No Japanese losses
Allied aircraft losses
OS2U-3 Kingfisher: 2 damaged
Japanese Ships
xAK Tamaki Maru
Aircraft Attacking:
2 x OS2U-3 Kingfisher bombing from 1000 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 250 lb SAP Bomb
CAP engaged:
Kamikawa Maru-1 with F1M2 Pete (1 airborne, 4 on standby, 0 scrambling)
1 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 5000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 7 minutes
Kamikawa Maru-2 with E13A1 Jake (3 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
3 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 6000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 6000.
Raid is overhead
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Lost my first Kingfisher today and another Skytrain. Gosh, those are fragile planes.


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (156.99 KiB) Viewed 468 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
He's going to have some backfilling to do, whatever happens!
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Wasnt there supposed to be engagement at Wake this turn , did IJN pull back ?
Edit: Nevermind found the answer it was posted ,indeed they pulled back
Edit: Nevermind found the answer it was posted ,indeed they pulled back
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
ORIGINAL: Evoken
Wasnt there supposed to be engagement at Wake this turn , did IJN pull back ?
Edit: Nevermind found the answer it was posted ,indeed they pulled back
I pushed forward to see if could catch him staging...no joy.
He has pulled back a couple of times previously, like this. On the ground, he is super aggressive with his troops and likes shock attacks even with tired troops.
I managed to pick up 15 VPs worth of destroyed IJ ground forces yesterday.[:)]

- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (381.44 KiB) Viewed 468 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
The last of the Thundering Herd makes their escape...


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (291.71 KiB) Viewed 468 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
I think Asheville is the PG with a couple of 6" guns - useful for bombardment or taking out enemy small fry.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Okay turn is away, and we have three separate solid naval intercepts and one potential naval air attack...but other than that it is all Japan right now![;)]
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
I think Asheville is the PG with a couple of 6" guns - useful for bombardment or taking out enemy small fry.
Shows 4" in this mod.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
I believe BBfanboy may be thinking of the Charleston?
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
Okay turn is away, and we have three separate solid naval intercepts and one potential naval air attack...but other than that it is all Japan right now![;)]
Do you mean by that, that you have created 3 separate transport TFs each comprised of only merchantmen and you are sending them directly to a Japanese port which displays an enemy TF icon present, or to the ocean hex which displays an enemy TF icon?[:)]
If you keep sending single xAK TFs to enemy ports, the enemy combat TFs may never have sufficient OPS/ammo to leave port after combat. That's one way to keep your valuable combat TFs safe from naval intercepts.[;)]
Alfred
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
My bad- Charleston is the one with 6" guns. Old guy memory - or lack thereof ...[:(]ORIGINAL: ushakov
I believe BBfanboy may be thinking of the Charleston?
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Got the turn...from Japan secret communication...haven't run the turn yet:
Ouch, I can see why you were excited about that turn.
Another turn like this and you will have to change your title on your AAR
Ouch, I can see why you were excited about that turn.
Another turn like this and you will have to change your title on your AAR

-
- Posts: 3394
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
ORIGINAL: Alfred
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
Okay turn is away, and we have three separate solid naval intercepts and one potential naval air attack...but other than that it is all Japan right now![;)]
Do you mean by that, that you have created 3 separate transport TFs each comprised of only merchantmen and you are sending them directly to a Japanese port which displays an enemy TF icon present, or to the ocean hex which displays an enemy TF icon?[:)]
If you keep sending single xAK TFs to enemy ports, the enemy combat TFs may never have sufficient OPS/ammo to leave port after combat. That's one way to keep your valuable combat TFs safe from naval intercepts.[;)]
Alfred
Also a useful tactic offensively as chaff in major fleet engagements - IJN DD's seem to love expending Long Lances on freighters. Much more comforting fighting IJN ships knowing the big damage dealers have been expended.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
New Years Eve, 1941
A three destroyer squadron intercepts a juicy task force at Jesselton, gets a torpedo hit that fails to detonate, and the IJN craftily manages to withdraw for now...

A three destroyer squadron intercepts a juicy task force at Jesselton, gets a torpedo hit that fails to detonate, and the IJN craftily manages to withdraw for now...

- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (97.14 KiB) Viewed 467 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
TF Australia reacts to and pursues the IJN fleet...catching it, closing the Perth damages the patrol boat escorts that managed to bounce a shell of her deck armor, then the Australia sinks two ships before the IJN manage to escape...
No time to rescue soldiers in the water...we need another engagement!

No time to rescue soldiers in the water...we need another engagement!

- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (294.42 KiB) Viewed 467 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
This convoy manages to break away again...only 7 more lives left.


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (264.91 KiB) Viewed 467 times