Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
One cap trap pays off...Wilcats down 13 bombers, while the Tony Id tries to tangle with the Deathstar pilots. Mistake.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Moving forward. Fuel situation is pretty strong in Saigon....but it doesn't ship across to Quinhon and up the coast rail line....pretty well modeled I think.
Trapped all Burma and Indochina troops now...
Trapped all Burma and Indochina troops now...
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Need to clean up Cam Ranh Bay, clear the coast rail line, before I really move hard on the Chinese Coast....it is a question of supply and logistics.
Knocked off 5 Light Industry at Wuchang...have recon on Shanghai
Have plans for all the shipping at Hong Kong...
Saigon ship yard fully repaired and busy. Can't get large ships up to it (size 10
) ...but it shouldn't be too long to take Singers and Ayuthia (next to Bangkok which will then fall very quickly).
Knocked off 5 Light Industry at Wuchang...have recon on Shanghai
Have plans for all the shipping at Hong Kong...
Saigon ship yard fully repaired and busy. Can't get large ships up to it (size 10
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
You can send ships up to 15K up an estuary, so cruisers can use that SY at Saigon. Maybe some large transports and oilers in that category too. If you get HK or Pescadores you have another great area with SY support.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
- CaptBeefheart
- Posts: 2612
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
- Location: Seoul, Korea
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Once you clear Cam Ranh Bay I'd expect the fuel to flow north.
Does Bangkok have a yard? You'll be quite sorted with Singapore and HK (50 each?) in terms of yards, but every little bit helps.
What level of troops are you seeing in Canton and HK?
Cheers,
CB
Does Bangkok have a yard? You'll be quite sorted with Singapore and HK (50 each?) in terms of yards, but every little bit helps.
What level of troops are you seeing in Canton and HK?
Cheers,
CB
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
In stock Bangkok does not have a SY.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
CaptBeefheart wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2023 1:25 am Once you clear Cam Ranh Bay I'd expect the fuel to flow north.
Does Bangkok have a yard? You'll be quite sorted with Singapore and HK (50 each?) in terms of yards, but every little bit helps.
What level of troops are you seeing in Canton and HK?
Cheers,
CB
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Pescadores has a small yard...11, perfect for repairing damaged destroyers.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Oct 10, 1943
Take Kluong today...have three divisions in our spearhead, and another two more racing down the rails...plus more on the way.
Take Kluong today...have three divisions in our spearhead, and another two more racing down the rails...plus more on the way.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
October 11, 1943
Did some night strategic bombing....also hit several other cities from Sian all the way down to the eastern end of Formosa.
Did some night strategic bombing....also hit several other cities from Sian all the way down to the eastern end of Formosa.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Those Liberators bombing Takao did very well - 3 aircraft get 2 LI hits at night with severe storms! Must have been using H2S or Oboe!
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Assigning just one bomber squadron to each base we netted, (Shanghai was the only base with current DL on it):BBfanboy wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 3:30 pm Those Liberators bombing Takao did very well - 3 aircraft get 2 LI hits at night with severe storms! Must have been using H2S or Oboe!
Wuchang 8 LI
Takao 5 LI
Shanghai 3 repair shipyard (hit manpower)
Taihoku: No listed damage, but fires started (hit manpower)
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
October 12, 1943
Got 2-1 on Cam Ranh Bay and dropped forts to 1. Not much longer.
Got 2-1 on Cam Ranh Bay and dropped forts to 1. Not much longer.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
October 13, 1943
By the end of October we should have Singers, Bangkok, and Cam Ranh Bay and be close on Miri. Then I guess we will be looking at invading Formosa and pushing heavily down the Chinese Coastline sieging Hong Kong and Canton and moving for Ningpo one of our goals.
By the end of October we should have Singers, Bangkok, and Cam Ranh Bay and be close on Miri. Then I guess we will be looking at invading Formosa and pushing heavily down the Chinese Coastline sieging Hong Kong and Canton and moving for Ningpo one of our goals.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
A little skirmish pretty far off Cam Ranh Bay....but the ships disappeared and we couldn't fly in any naval strikes...by throwing such weak ships against him, I am hoping to spark a larger IJN raid into our shipping lines in the South China Sea.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Oct 14, 1943
Nashville and company raid off Singers, which still has a large concentration of Japanese shipping. Kind of trash xaks...but the E is a solid ship and will help our subs in the area...
Nashville and company raid off Singers, which still has a large concentration of Japanese shipping. Kind of trash xaks...but the E is a solid ship and will help our subs in the area...
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Messing around to see what manpower bombing does....good DL and several waves of bombers manage to get the fires up to 9400. Those are absolutely rookie numbers...and the recon reports fires down to 1200 and no damage done. However, there seems to be often at least a day lag in getting the reports from a strategic strike back....there are three task forces with quite a few tankers present in the harbor.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Just another strike in the SRA....
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
19k IJA troopers stranded outside Cam Ranh Bay. Another 10K in the IJA 4th Division on the rail line west of Cam Ranh Bay. Minesweepers will arrive at Cam Ranh Bay and there is only 1 point of port damage left...runway is size 4, port size 7. So Once I destroy the 4th Division, which is out of supply and being whittled down each day, will be able to rail all the way to Vinh.
Ground combat at 62,72 (near Saigon)
Allied Deliberate attack
Attacking force 576 troops, 0 guns, 106 vehicles, Assault Value = 59
Defending force 4940 troops, 24 guns, 3 vehicles, Assault Value = 13
Allied adjusted assault: 26
Japanese adjusted defense: 25
Allied assault odds: 1 to 1
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), fatigue(-), supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(+), fatigue(-)
Japanese ground losses:
232 casualties reported
Squads: 14 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Assaulting units:
2/9th Armoured Regiment
Defending units:
4th Division
Ground combat at 62,72 (near Saigon)
Allied Deliberate attack
Attacking force 576 troops, 0 guns, 106 vehicles, Assault Value = 59
Defending force 4940 troops, 24 guns, 3 vehicles, Assault Value = 13
Allied adjusted assault: 26
Japanese adjusted defense: 25
Allied assault odds: 1 to 1
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), fatigue(-), supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(+), fatigue(-)
Japanese ground losses:
232 casualties reported
Squads: 14 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Assaulting units:
2/9th Armoured Regiment
Defending units:
4th Division
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
The 232 casualties and 18 squads works out to 12.9 troops per squad. That indicates they are not in really bad shape yet. I monitor that metric to decide when a shock attack is likely to destroy the whole lot while causing few casualties on my side. I use 6-7 men per squad as my decision point.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth


