PT boat

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: PT boat

Post by spence »

_ in game term, PT, barges and so on would be better simulated as "naval squadrons". As air squadrons they will be based somewhere and have a range, with missions as "supply transport", "troop transport", "patrol/base defence", "naval attack" (with a range set), etc... That will:
1) limit their range to realistic numbers. No more barges engaging KB 600 miles out of PH, or barges sailing from Kwajalein to Gilberts
2) their deployment would be done as IRL: you load ships and they sail where you want to drop PT/barges
3) op losses will be possible
4) distinction between day/night activity... barges sail at night and hide during day.
5) no more limit on production, so you can have historical number of barges (hundred at the same times) that will so give PT boats something to do..
6) on the other hand, a barge should be worth a victory point, as a transport aircraft is worth it
7) attacks of PT against enemy ships are more close to the attack of a torpedo boat against the same target (a quick attack trough fire by secondary and AA guns and then a quick retreat) than a battle against warships.

I support the "Amiral's" (mais Je crois qu'il n'est pas un amiral actuel) proposal, wish, or whatever. In item 7 I think he means "more close to the attack of a torpedo bomber rather than "torpedo boat" though. Although they never hit a capital ship with their torpedos IRL the potential was always there and that should figure somehow in the Japanese Player's calculations when planning bombardments and so forth. After all a torpedo which explodes against a hull is not happy news to the ship's captain irrespective of where it came from. Probably require a whole bucketload of new code though so I guess I will not hold my breath for it.
User avatar
Barb
Posts: 2503
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:17 am
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

RE: PT boat

Post by Barb »

Motor torpedo boat (PT), Tactical orders and doctrine, July 1942:

http://www.hnsa.org/doc/pt/doctrine/index.htm
Image
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: PT boat

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Yeah, PT-109 was more or less an accident. Did the Jap destroyer even notice them?

Yes - there is a first-hand (eyewitness) account by Hara in his book (Japanese Destroyer Captain (which supposedly has been recently reprinted))... the account also makes me doubt the claim that visibility was only 100 yards. Hara's DD shot up what he thought was a PT, but in retrospect was probably only part of the PT that already had been clove into two pieces.
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: PT boat

Post by m10bob »

I believe this is one of the books' footnotes as well.
Image

User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: PT boat

Post by crsutton »


.
Most of the Jap DDs could do 32knots but they took alot more time getting there than the PTs...and the PTs could turn on a dime compared to a DD.
[/quote]

It does really depend on the weather. In moderate to heavy winds and seas a DD would be able to go faster than a PT. Light to no winds, the PT scoots away. But I think that most PT commanders would not be operating in bad conditions unless abdolutely necessary.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
Apollo11
Posts: 25455
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

RE: PT boat

Post by Apollo11 »

Hi all,
ORIGINAL: rtrapasso

Yes - there is a first-hand (eyewitness) account by Hara in his book (Japanese Destroyer Captain (which supposedly has been recently reprinted))...

Yes... it is reprinted... I am currently waiting deliver of it... [:)]


Leo "Apollo11"
Image

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE
User avatar
kaleun
Posts: 5144
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 10:57 pm
Location: Colorado

RE: PT boat

Post by kaleun »

Yes... it is reprinted... I am currently waiting deliver of it...

You'll like it. I read it a few weeks ago.
Appear at places to which he must hasten; move swiftly where he does not expect you.
Sun Tzu
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”