Another informal Downfall poll

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Another informal Downfall poll

Post by DuckofTindalos »

That's a big part of the reason why I'm making this scenario. AE is such a long game that plenty of people will never get the chance to see this late-war stuff.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Another informal Downfall poll

Post by DuckofTindalos »

Okay, I think it'll be option B, with somewhere between 30 and 40 boats, including RN.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
Knavey
Posts: 2565
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 4:25 am
Location: Valrico, Florida

RE: Another informal Downfall poll

Post by Knavey »

I knew you were going to choose B regardless of how many guys chose A!

I personally liked D...but you didn't give us that option!
x-Nuc twidget
CVN-71
USN 87-93
"Going slow in the fast direction"
doc smith
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 1:06 am
Contact:

RE: Another informal Downfall poll

Post by doc smith »

B or C. Why clutter the scenario with crap that won't be used? (Still sulking because you guys nixed my request to let B-29s drop mines)
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Another informal Downfall poll

Post by Canoerebel »

How important is the Japanese production system to Downfall? If it's irrelevant or nearly so, perhaps I'll give playing the Japs a shot. After all, we Southerners love a lost cause.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
tocaff
Posts: 4765
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:30 pm
Location: USA now in Brasil

RE: Another informal Downfall poll

Post by tocaff »

A

Almost nothing to use the subs on is different than no targets at all.  Besides who will pick up those downed pilots?
Todd

I never thought that doing an AAR would be so time consuming and difficult.
www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2080768
User avatar
88l71
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 2:01 am

RE: Another informal Downfall poll

Post by 88l71 »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

All the research I've done into the Jap side of things leads me to think that they would have resisted fiercely but briefly on the beach and then everything would have collapsed rapidly afterwards. There were a lot of divisions in the Jap OOB, but very, very few weapons for them, and Japan was starving under the blockade. The IJA was in a very sorry state.

Right, and that's considering US airpower hadn't even started hitting railroads and transportation yet, which they would no doubt have done as a prelude to invasion.
Senor_Droolcup
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 10:22 pm

Op Downfall

Post by Senor_Droolcup »

Can't wait to see this: Op Downfall is one of my favorite historical topics. Don't sell the Japanese short: they had a very good plan for ending the war: bleed the Americans dry on the beaches and negotiate a better peace than Unconditional Surrender, with no war-crimes trials and no occupation (essentially, a ceasefire). With all those kamikazes, it would have made Okinawa look a tea-party. And remember that on Okinawa, the US had absolute air superiority, plentiful naval gunfire support at all targets, and they still fought to bitter end. It was supposed to take days and it took months. I don't think we saved anything close to a "million" American lives at Hiroshima, but we certainly saved a million Japanese lives, if you apply the civilian death rates from Okinawa to the southern part of Kyushu.....Keep working, Terminus! I love WITP-AE and can't wait to see the fruit of your labors....
Brian D. Liddicoat
Attorney at Law
Corralitos, CA
sfbaytf
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:54 pm

RE: Another informal Downfall poll

Post by sfbaytf »

I vote for "A" with a pilot rescue option.

Can't stiff the Silent Service, especially in light of the horrible torpedoes they had to contend with at the beginning of the war. If the results I'm getting are accurate-and I have no reason to doubt it, imagine how naval warfare would have evolved if the torpedoes actually worked at the beginning of the war.
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Another informal Downfall poll

Post by Cap Mandrake »

I feel like this is some kind of psychological screening test.

1) I like to comb the tossles on my rugs so they are all lined up straight?

2) I always start assembling the parts to a bicycle before I read the instructions.

3) I like to group my underwear by color.

4) I had trouble finding my car keys this morning.


.........

Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Another informal Downfall poll

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: drw61

I would like version A.  (Use them to pickup downed air crews.)
Ditto. If AE uses submarines for rescuing downed air crews (like WiTP did), this is an argument for having a multitude of submarines for the allied player-because of the air war.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”