ORIGINAL: Nikademus
i always meant to read that book......
It is worth it. It's a fast read, and better than the movie ( which is usually the case ).
Moderator: maddog986
ORIGINAL: Nikademus
i always meant to read that book......

ORIGINAL: stuman
ORIGINAL: Nikademus
i always meant to read that book......
It is worth it. It's a fast read, and better than the movie ( which is usually the case ).

ORIGINAL: ilovestrategy
ORIGINAL: stuman
ORIGINAL: Nikademus
i always meant to read that book......
It is worth it. It's a fast read, and better than the movie ( which is usually the case ).
I used to love the movie "The Caine Mutiny" until I found the book for a dollar at a used book store. I've read the book three times now and don't like the movie anymore.
Humphrey Bogart was in top form though. First class acting.

Warspite1ORIGINAL: stuman
ORIGINAL: ilovestrategy
ORIGINAL: stuman
It is worth it. It's a fast read, and better than the movie ( which is usually the case ).
I used to love the movie "The Caine Mutiny" until I found the book for a dollar at a used book store. I've read the book three times now and don't like the movie anymore.
Humphrey Bogart was in top form though. First class acting.
..........saying a book is better than a movie adaptation is not necessarily condemning the movie.

I agree. A movie is limited by technical possibilities. A book is limited only by imagination.ORIGINAL: stuman
....I think saying a book is better than a movie adaptation is not necessarily condemning the movie.
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Warspite1ORIGINAL: stuman
ORIGINAL: ilovestrategy
I used to love the movie "The Caine Mutiny" until I found the book for a dollar at a used book store. I've read the book three times now and don't like the movie anymore.
Humphrey Bogart was in top form though. First class acting.
..........saying a book is better than a movie adaptation is not necessarily condemning the movie.
Unless of course the subject is Raise The Titanic. Clive Cussler's book was brilliant, the film was an embarrasment![]()


ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN
You need to be on the front line in Afghanistan.This thread needs more "Tiger scare" factor.
ORIGINAL: Greybriar
I agree. A movie is limited by technical possibilities. A book is limited only by imagination.
Warspite1ORIGINAL: ilovestrategy
Wow, I havent read Raise the Titantic in thirty years. Was it a Dirk Pitt novel? I cannot remember. Never saw the movie, I heard to many bad things about it.
Unless of course the subject is Raise The Titanic. Clive Cussler's book was brilliant, the film was an embarrasment


Warspite1ORIGINAL: Nikademus
I loved the movie.....but i was a kid so sue me and i was really into the Titanic's story. [:D]
.This thread needs more "Tiger scare" factor
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Sorry Nik but I should really sue you for that "I loved the movie" comment. However, you admitted you were a kid so I am prepared to let you off on this occasion [;)] (Just don't say you liked Pearl Harbor!).
I like these scary burning "tigers" better; [:'(]I like pictures of scary burning tigers, scary out-of-fuel tigers, scary flipped-over-by-bomb tigers, and scary shot-in-the-engine-by-an-M3-Stuart-tigers. It's almost like the Germans lost the war or something when you look at those.

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN
mdupe,I like these scary burning "tigers" better; [:'(]I like pictures of scary burning tigers, scary out-of-fuel tigers, scary flipped-over-by-bomb tigers, and scary shot-in-the-engine-by-an-M3-Stuart-tigers. It's almost like the Germans lost the war or something when you look at those.

We feel about those films the same way as we do about ones having US submarines capturing enigma machinesORIGINAL: Obsolete
Just ask what the English think about the Patriot or Braveheart movies, etc.
ORIGINAL: warspite1
It's the abomination otherwise known as Pearl Harbor.......


