Originally posted by TIMJOT
Entemedor
Great information. Now can Mdiehl concede that the probility is high that Sakai did shoot down a p-39 or at least had the opportunity to and can massario concede that pilot kill claims are generally inaccurate.
Howdy,
I took a few days off here for a purpose
I admit, mdiehl has had some good points. I have been aware of the Japanese overclaiming all along, however, I got upset because he absolutely rejected all of Sakai's accounts. If given reasonable evidence, I will change my mind. But, regarding the P-39 thing, I am not convinced.
I will no more argue about this. Obviously there is nothing I can do to prove mdiehl anything. If he has set his mind and will not even consider other possibilities, be it so.
IIRC, the Japanese Aces book mentions that they only talk about claims not actual kills. In the end of the book they have listed some major air engagements, where they show what the Japanese claimed and also what they have been able to find on the Allied records. Often, the results vary greatly both ways.
Merry Xmas to all,
--Mikko
PS Perhaps I will get one of the Lundstrom books sometime... They have been praised for accuracy and mdiehl often mentions them
