ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget
Don't mess with my mind! It's one hit and back to port and repairs and then two hits and back to port again. Like HMS Terror not a "pure" example of a "three hits survivor". Let the OP decide.
This whole discussion is moot - there are torpedoes and then there are
torpedoes! Someone already mentioned that the aerial torpedoes had much less boom than most sub or surface ship torps, and of course the long lance had the biggest bang of all.
In the case of HMS Terror, I am pretty sure the torpedoes she took were:
1. with small warheads
2. filled with much less potent explosives
IOW, we may be comparing apples to apples but there is a world of difference between varieties.
Yes. Someone has already mentioned some Japanese maru that took a dozen or more (non-exploding) torpedo hits without issue. So the answer boils down to how parsimonious you want to get regarding the OP qualifiers.
If we talk about "number of torpedo hits" the clear winner is the lucky maru that had a bunch of Mk. 14s NOT explode against her hull.
If we get into the meaning of "survive", then the clear winner is
West Virginia that was back in the war a couple years after taking 7 torpedoes at Pearl Harbor.
If we talk about exploding torpedoes, then the maru that was hit by 3 torps and towed back to port (and lived again) seems to be a winner.
Not sure how HMS
Terror is entering the discussion, as it does not seem to surpass any of the other interpretations above. But, to each their own.