Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

ChiefOC
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 11:05 pm
Location: Carrollton, TX

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by ChiefOC »

So closing out 1942 after 55 weeks after the first strike on Pearl Harbor by the IJN.

31 DEC 42

China remains one giant Pier 13 brawl. The IJA advances and I swing the Chinese troops around and take cities - with supply caches - only to be chased out again. China does have three pacific ports. Wenchow (89,58) - which has been Chinese since the opening moves, and Kwangchowan (73,60) and Pakhoi (72,58) much farther west, which were reoccupied found surprisingly abandoned. These will be useful when I can start smuggling supplies into the Chinese mainland.

The BTO is starting to roll having retaken Rangoon. Still some serious concern at Lashio which is contested and I don't seem to be getting anywhere there. My supplies are barely trickling in and I'm rotating fresh troops in as exhausted ones are pulled out. I'm truly confounded where the IJA supplies are coming from.

Java is proving to be the cork in the bottle I was hoping for. It has been a few months since any fresh IJA troops were landed while I'm trickling in troops and squadrons. Without doubt, the heroes of Java have been my Soerbaya sortees. I was beginning to think they were running out of proverbial rope, but now maybe not so much. Southern Java appears to be making it's own fuel, and a good part of it's supplies. With the Japanese loss of five CVs, three CVLs, five BBs and about ten CAs, sunk, the waters around Java are a lot safer. With more modern British and US fighters continuously taking roost, long range IJA bombers are becoming less and less frequent visitors, making the skies friendlier as well. And always fewer in number leaving. The bulk of the IJA is in(and contested) at Bandoeng (50,100). They are surrounded and with a solid line of Allied units between their only links to the sea at Batavia and Merek.

Darwin is now out of danger. It has been a few months since IJA bombers have tried their luck against flocks of relatively modern Allied fighters, and proficiency among the Darwin fighters is growing. And that does not even take into account the significant Allied Troops and defenses

Likewise, the same goes for in and around Port Morseby. It has been a couple months since any IJA bombers have been seen south of PM. And those few who try to strike PM are easily rebuffed.

The southern defense/supply line is firm with logistics and troops flowing smoothly and safely. The quick success at Luganville has only emboldened me. Next year, 1943, from Noumea, I will make a leapfrog north, not sure where, but will not likely be Guadalcanal - bit further north or a bit southerly; but not The Canal. Similarly, I'm going to have a go at liberating Wake, as well as greenlighting Operation Flintlock in The Marshall Islands.

End of year stats:

Allied Bases Controlled: 442
Allied Base points: 8,800

Japanese Bases Controlled: 415
Japanese Base points: 6,330

Allied A/C pts Lost: 3,717
IJA/IJN A/C pts lost: 7,032

Allied army pts lost: 9,904
IJA army pts lost: 5,715

Allied Ships sunk: 245
PTs for sunk Allied ships: 1,624

IJN Ships sunk: 1,152
Pts for sunk IJN ships: 10,373

Political pts avail: 7,245

Japanese score: 21,605
Allied score: 33,955


Seeking Vic-to-ry in 19-Forty-three. 😃
Chief O'C
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20497
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by BBfanboy »

The cessation of air strikes at some bases probably signals the script for the AI reaching an End Date for capture of that base. It is not a clear indicator that the AI is short of aircraft nor trained pilots. The AI has some "cheats" programmed in to allow it to give you a bit of challenge, and replenishing some of its aircraft stocks and pilots might be part of that.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
ChiefOC
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 11:05 pm
Location: Carrollton, TX

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by ChiefOC »

Copy that BBFanboy. As always, I appreciate the insight and Intel.
Chief O'C
ChiefOC
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 11:05 pm
Location: Carrollton, TX

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by ChiefOC »

05 JAN 43

0930. 750 miles SW of Johnston Island, a lonely PBY, Bird Dog Seven, is on routine patrol. Nearing the point to adjust her course stretching SE, her radioman, looking out the giant starboard waist blister, called to the pilot.

"Skipper, I see ships - two carriers and two cruisers!"

"Call it in Sparks, send Main Body".

"Aye, aye sir! Dogpatch, Dogpatch - this is Bird Dog 7, Main Body, I say again Main Body!"

I had another "main body", sighting from my Johnston Island PBYs. The sighting was a few days due west of where Sara, Lex, and Wasp were training and providing long-range overwatch on a handful of convoys. The next day, another sighting. This is probably the real deal and not just whale watching. I readied up my squadrons and headed to intercept. I figured this must be the missing half of the KB that wasn't resting in Davy Jones' locker, but on the prowl. I also thought this engagement was going to be bad.

Naval (Air) Battle of Johnston Island

08 Jan 43
CVL Chiyoda - sunk

09 Jan 43
CVL Chitose - sunk
DD Sazanami - sunk

12 Jan 43
DD Uzuki - sunk

No USN losses, but Wasp took one torpedo hit and Sara, once again, took two torpedoes. Real glad once again for Saratoga's battlecruiser armor. My CVBG is headed back to Pearl and her ever busy repair docks at 15 knots.

I am also glad I went up against "second-stringers" as my airgroups are still having trouble getting their poop in a group. This evidenced as even with a large CAP of three squadrons of Wildcats, a few Kates did their job. And some groups still had issues forming up. Bit of a surprise as well as these two CVLs are not listed in my Jane's Fighting Ships (1939 Ed) on the coffee tables in my Carriers' wardrooms. Hmm.
:shock:
Chief O'C
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20497
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by BBfanboy »

Chitose and Chiyoda start out as Seaplane Carriers, with a couple of squadrons of float planes IIRC. They can be converted to CVL at Tokyo and that takes quite some time.

I don't think BB side armour does much against torpedo attack. Such armour only extends below the waterline 15-20 feet and torps are normally set to 25+ feet for big ships.
Saratoga's huge size (40,000 tons?), torpedo blisters and compartmentation probably kept the damage minimal. Those things are factored into the durability rating.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18565
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by RangerJoe »

To counter the torpedo bombers, you need to have a lower level CAP, say at 6k feet. This might also get you some Mavis or Emily flying boats or Jakes and other float planes flying search.

"Chief & the Ensign

The Chief was bragging to the Ensign one day. You know, I know everyone there is to know. Just name Someone, Anyone and I know them.

Tired of his boasting, the Ensign called his bluff, Okay, Chief, how about Tom Cruise.

Sure, yes, Tom and I are old friends and I can prove it.

So they fly out to Hollywood and knock on Tom Cruise's door and sure enough, Tom Cruise, shouts, Chief ! Great to see You! You and your friend come right in and join me for lunch!

Although impressed, the Ensign is still skeptical. After they leave Cruise's house, he tells the Chief that he thinks his knowing Cruise was just lucky. No, no, just name anyone else, the Chief says. President Bush, the Ensign quickly retorts.

Yep I know him, let's fly out to Washington.

So, off they go. At the White House, Bush spots them on the tour and motions them over, saying, Chief, what a surprise. I was just on my way to a meeting, but you and that Ensign come on in and let's catch up.

Well, the Ensign is very shaken by now, but still not totally convinced.

After they leave the White House grounds, he expresses his doubts to the Chief, who again implores him to name anyone else.

The new Pope, the Ensign replies. Sure, I've known the Pope a long time. So, off they fly to Rome. They're assembled with the masses in Vatican Square when the Chief says, this will never work. I can't catch the Pope's eye among all these people. Tell you what, I know all the guards, so let me just go upstairs and I'll come out on the balcony with the Pope. He disappears into the crowd headed toward St. Peter's. Sure enough, half an hour later, the Chief emerges with the Pope on the balcony.

But by the time he returns, he finds that the Ensign has had a heart attack and is surrounded by paramedics.

Working his way to his side, the Chief asks the Ensign, What Happened to him.

The Ensign looks up and says, I was doing fine until you and The Pope came out on the balcony and the tourist next to me asked, Who's that on the balcony next to the Chief. "
Attachments
when the new ensign checks in.jpg
when the new ensign checks in.jpg (59.84 KiB) Viewed 1865 times
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
ChiefOC
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 11:05 pm
Location: Carrollton, TX

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by ChiefOC »

Copy Copy.

Affirmative, I was vaguely aware Chitose and Chiyoda had some (one had two) refits, but reckoned the refit would be in '43 and back in service '44. Did not know they would show this early. Kinda cool in two regards.

My favorite Navy Chief cartoon, done by Broadsides IIRC.
Chief and Ensign
Chief and Ensign
FB_IMG_1498828405492.jpg (36.97 KiB) Viewed 1836 times
Chief O'C
ChiefOC
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 11:05 pm
Location: Carrollton, TX

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by ChiefOC »

So it's time to start relieving the watch at Soerbaya. I need to get some of the ABDA CLs to quiet ports to facilitate some refits. Soerbaya is probably safe from both air and Amphib attacks. But, I want to keep her yards clear for routine repairs of DDs and emergency repairs for the collection of subs calling Soerbaya homeport. To this end, Australia's sister, HMAS Canberra, is part of one of the convoys inbound. Similarly, the heavy cruiser USS San Francisco, with a division of long legged USN destroyers, is also inbound for Soerbaya as reinforcements.

31 Jan 43

Not going to go through the stats this go, as not many noteworthy. Save one. January '43 saw the loss of only one Allied ship. New Year's Day saw the 8 pt Commonwealth AP Slemmestad sunk by IJA bombers as she neared Rangoon. Grrrr. And with her, another Base Force lost half it's troops and supplies.

Insanely, the AI says the Japanese lost 201 ships in Jan of '43. There have been many IJN vessels sunk, including at least a dozen tankers by submarine fired Mk 14 fish. But, a couple of the "heavies" reported lost, are definitely Fog of War hopefulness. However, two newly refitted IJN CVLs were definitely sunk.


Also Noteworthy

USS Yorktown in company with HMS Hermes, and friends, are returning to patrol near Rangoon. Also back in the hunt, (drum rolls, ruffles and flourishes please), His Majesty's Ships Prince of Wales and Repulse - once again shipshape and in Bristol fashion, with newish CAs and other escorts; dropped anchor in The Cocos Islands.

Badly damaged HMS Royal Sovereign made it to the yards in Cape Town without incident. But her war may be over. And RS's former escort, DD Bagley made it safely to Cocos Islands where she has been being worked on by the Dutch AR Castor. Now capable of 25 knots, (20 float and 30 structure damage remaining), Bagley will be part of the escort for next group bound for Columbo.
Chief O'C
ChiefOC
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 11:05 pm
Location: Carrollton, TX

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by ChiefOC »

11 Feb 43

It had only been a few days since HMAS Canberra arrived, when late one day flags fluttered from HMAS Australia signaling a sortee. Recon had sighted another small convoy including a large tanker, transports with escorts bound for Batavia. Commodore Dechaineaux flying his Flag from Australia was seeking a night action. There have been numerous sightings near and around Batavia, and I prefer not having daytime run-ins with any battleships.

After a fast run NE to Batavia, contact was made by RADAR. Guns and torpedoes sought their targets. I am glad this Squadron has been so busy, as torpedo hits are getting more frequent. Nothing quite says your ship is having a bad day, as when her screws (propellers to lubbers) are slowly spinning in the air.

Sunk were:
CVL Ryoho
DD Yukikaze
DD Hayashio
DD Asagumo

No Allied losses, though Canberra received her baptism of fire.
Night action summary
Night action summary
20220108_204108.jpg (4.5 MiB) Viewed 1826 times
Night action Batavia 1
Night action Batavia 1
20220108_204516.jpg (5.92 MiB) Viewed 1826 times
Chief O'C
ChiefOC
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 11:05 pm
Location: Carrollton, TX

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by ChiefOC »

As Australia's Avengers made their way back to Soerabaja, a PBY spotted a Japanese Carrier group in the Banda Sea (North of Timor). Could it be following the same track to attack Koepang, again? Enterprise and Hornet were due West of Koepang moving to welcome Yorktown back, but has now been diverted. Darwin is out of fuel, and a convoy with @20K+ tons of fuel is enroute. With more following. Having all three of my Yorktown class CVs in the Timor Sea is worth nothing, if they are outta gas.

Meanwhile another convoy has made it to Christmas Island (IO). It brought two squadrons of B-26s and a Squadron of B-25s. Once these birds and their crews get sorted, they will fly into Tjilatjap and add their weight, to finally break the stalemate at Bandoeng.

18 Feb 43

Third (fourth?) Battle of Koepang.

CV Zuikaku - sunk
DD Minekaze - sunk
CA Nachi - heavy damage, heavy fires and would sink 2/19

Airstrikes over two days. It was cool to see flocks of USN strike a/c with fighter escort for a change. No USN losses, but Enterprise took a torpedo and Hornet took a bomb and two torpedoes. Ahh, back to the yards with ye lassies.

I was surprised when my Beafort VIIIs out of Koepang attacked with bombs. An investigation showed only two torpedoes were in stock after the first day's strikes. Grrr. But in hindsight, this was good. I see now the MLD HQ at Koepang has to withdraw in @90 days. Time to find another Air HQ. If I have to, I'll take it out of Darwin. But another of the KB 6 has joined her sisters on the bottom, at what is now being called Carrier Shoals.
Zuijaju sol
Zuijaju sol
20220110_151130.jpg (5.41 MiB) Viewed 1798 times
Chief O'C
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18565
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by RangerJoe »

You can have Air HQ automatically resupplied with torpedoes.
Attachments
send beer.jpg
send beer.jpg (71.78 KiB) Viewed 1766 times
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
ChiefOC
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 11:05 pm
Location: Carrollton, TX

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by ChiefOC »

Copy Ranger Joe. I will have the base Suppo get on that.
Chief O'C
ChiefOC
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 11:05 pm
Location: Carrollton, TX

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by ChiefOC »

Australia's Avengers had barely finished taking on stores and the Emergency Sortee message had come from Soerbaya Command. Japanese convoys were massing towards Batavia, and hopefully night-time would once again favor the bold.

22 Feb 43

I could not believe my eyes when the combatants were displayed. Just outside of Batavia, another IJN Fleet Carrier with a minimal escort.

2/22

Sunk
CV Hiryu
DD Hayate
DD Matsukaze

As a a bonus DD Akigumo had been sunk during the day by B-26 bombs inport Batavia. And another clean escape by the ABDA ships, with no IJN ships docking/landing on Java.

Indeed Lady Luck had smiled my way again. The sheer number of gunnery hits during their last two engagements shows my Squadron desperately needs more teeth. Once again, my torpedoes had also been spot on.
Attachments
Hiryu1
Hiryu1
20220111_102425.jpg (5.81 MiB) Viewed 1740 times
Hiryu2
Hiryu2
20220111_101801.jpg (6.18 MiB) Viewed 1740 times
Hiryu3
Hiryu3
20220111_101757.jpg (4.26 MiB) Viewed 1740 times
Last edited by ChiefOC on Sun Dec 11, 2022 3:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Chief O'C
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18565
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by RangerJoe »

The sheer number of hits could also be from your lighter AA guns on your ships.
Attachments
Marines  its not your fault guys  that crayon box did look alot like MREs.jpeg
Marines its not your fault guys that crayon box did look alot like MREs.jpeg (48.12 KiB) Viewed 1732 times
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
ChiefOC
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 11:05 pm
Location: Carrollton, TX

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by ChiefOC »

23 Feb 43

The day after Hiryu's sinking and concurrent US light bombers sinking a IJN DD in Batavia, the USAAF flying out of Tjilatjap struck Batavia again. This time the destroyer Akigumo sank when her magazine exploded from a direct hit from a 500 lb bomb. There was also claims of bombs hitting a Nagato class battleship. :shock:

Elsewhere, USS Wasp's Task Force absorbed HMS Victorious outside the Panama Canal and is escorting her to Oz. Their group is currently cruising south of The Territory of Hawaii and I am taking pause. Victoria is due a refit which will take 75 days and yet Vicky is due back in Blighty about 110 days afterwards. Hmmm. I think I will pass on her refit, which appears mostly a huge bump in her AA. With her medium-sized aircraft facilities, I believe I will mostly load her out with fighters with a single strike squadron and using her to cover convoys from land based air. I guess we will sea if the Refit happens in Londonderry when Vicky makes her encore appearance in '44.

Noteworthy, in about 60 days the U.S Navy's first floating drydock, AFDB-1, will finish fitting out in Seattle. My thoughts are to take her out to Midway, via Dutch Harbor. I will plow the very slow road in front of it's 5-Knot flotilla with a slow cargo convoy, followed by a HK TF, then the AFDB group escorted by another HK TF. Then have a CVE TF join the parade from Dutch Harbor to Midway. My strategic plan is to have AFDB-1 go from Midway, then to Wake, then Guam following their respective retakings.

Speaking of Pearl, Sara is back in the yards after another Betty hit her with a torpedo while her TF was providing aircover to a Wake bombardment TF.

28 Feb 43 Stats

Allied a/c pts lost: 4158
IJA/IJN a/c pts lost: 8143

Allied Army pts lost: 10,429
IJA Army pts lost: 6,149

Allies ships sunk: 254
Pts for sunk Allied ships: 1,684

IJN ships sunk: 1,302*
Pts for IJN ships sunk: 13,503

Politcal pts: 6380

Japanese score: 22,708
Allied score: 37,898

*The fog of war says the BB Haruna was sunk by 500 lb bombs near Phuket (48,68). But no Allied land based air presently has that range, and no Allied CV TFs have been in that area.

Apologies for the poor photo of Akigumo's bombing. Sometimes when I play for extended periods - letters, in this example the lower case "a"; disappear or change color. I have gotten a brand new super LT to play DW2 on, but have yet to load up WitP-AE for a couple reasons.
Dd Akigumo
Dd Akigumo
20220113_214606.jpg (5.87 MiB) Viewed 1694 times
Chief O'C
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18565
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by RangerJoe »

If a ship was badly damaged it may sink later or be close to sinking. If it sinks, it will tell you the position but it will also tell you the same thing if it is close to sinking. One way to check for a ship carrying aircraft is to check the ground losses. If there are some for no apparent reason, then the ship sank. Although the aircraft may have flown to another base or ship so they won't show up on the report. Anyway, the Haruna sank or is badly damaged.
Attachments
navy veteran.jpg
navy veteran.jpg (83.51 KiB) Viewed 1687 times
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20497
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by BBfanboy »

It could also be that Haruna is not the ship being reported on - FOW on which ship was hit in the first place. If you got 20+ hits with 500 or 1000 pound bombs on another IJN BB, that is likely the one shown as sunk (which may or may not be true). That many bomb hits can cause runaway fires and enough system damage that the crew cannot fight them effectively.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
ChiefOC
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 11:05 pm
Location: Carrollton, TX

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by ChiefOC »

31 Mar 43

The two earlier small airstrikes against Batavia reminded me of something. Last year when the IJA was romping through Burma, with impunity I might add, it was spending some effort bombing Calcutta. I didn't get it. Then I took a look at my port, as usually there was no reported damage to the troops nor air units. I was aghast. I had overlooked how much shipping had made port, and anchored there. There were burning and sinking ships everywhere. I scattered those seaworthy, and buffed up my CAP. Many Allied merchies in Calcutta sank before their fires were put out. Time for returning the instruction. Perhaps, as a secondary affect, if I don't sink any ships that get through, I'll trash the port facilities. Airstrikes on the port are now daily sortees.

The USAAF flying out of Tjilatjap is now splitting its efforts to bombing Batavia, and airdropping supplies as well as flying CAP over Bandoeng. Much damage to port facilities, as well as hits on shipping are being reported at Batavia. Notably, more sightings and hits on a battleship. Can't fault the AI for that. When Force Z was initially hit, I limped it into Singapore. When Singapore was getting squeezed and threatened, Force Z beetled down to Batavia for a week or so for any repairs possible. Both capital ships eventually, separately made it to Capetown, and are now Homeported out of Cocos Islands.

Speaking of Bandoeng, it appears IJA forces there seem to be about two thousand smaller as well as one less unit. Hmmm.

The USMC's 22nd Marine Regiment disembarked at the Australian island of Ndeni (9 hexes SW of Guadalcanal). Joining the 22nd, is NZ's 15 AA Brigade. Following them soon are base force and engineers to build a airfield. Ndeni is within Espiritu Santo's air cover and when developed will almost be equivalent to Guadalcanal, (Air capacity 5) without having to fight for it. And Guadalcanal will be within fighter(?)/airstrike range of Ndeni

SSW of Espiritu Santo is my first CVE group. Three Combustible Vulnerable Expendibles (60 Wildcats and 27 Avengers) with three DDs (ASW ratings 8, 8, and 6) should be able to both protect themselves as well the increasingly traveled waterways. Their current mission though, is to bring in replacement squadrons for Big E and Hornet.

Also in nearby waters small fry are attending to other "housekeeping". Four APDs have been landing/reembarking the 1st Fiji Commando Battalion to/from islands around Espiritu Santo - changing red dots to green. Likewise DD USS Drayton and AP William W. Burrows transported the Kiwi Rarotonga Detachment and reoccupied the island of Funafuti (138,147), and are returning to Suva. My convoys, often with little or no escorts, were nervously skirting these Japanese islands. Now I know, hopefully, any "eyes" on them are friendly.

Speaking of eyes, March '43 closed with a large bang.

- - - - - -

Bridge on battlecruiser Repulse offshore of Batavia, Java.

"P-Wo!, called Captain Tennant.

"Sah!", responded Repulse's Primary Weapons Officer.

"Commander, the Flag will be making a small course adjustment shortly. As we pivot and follow Prince of Wales, the order to commence fire will break from her yards. You will instruct your gunners to use, what I suspect, is a pagoda mast in the centre ;) of Batavia as our aiming point."

"Aye aye, sir!"

- - - - -

I had assigned a port bombardment group from Cocos Islands. The heavies were Prince of Wales, Repulse, CAs Cornwall, Hawkins and Frobisher escorted by 10 destroyers. During the extensive/prolonged bombardment, the computer announced a magazine explosion aboard BB Mutsu. :shock: In the AAR, the Mutsu was declared sunk and the intel report credited cause of sinking to 15in/42 BL MK 1. HMS Repulse was the only ship in the action so armed. I presumed Mutsu was already heavily damaged from USAAF airstrikes. :shock: Weird.
Chief O'C
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18565
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by RangerJoe »

ChiefOC wrote: Thu Dec 01, 2022 6:45 pm 31 Mar 43

The two earlier small airstrikes against Batavia reminded me of something. Last year when the IJA was romping through Burma, with impunity I might add, it was spending some effort bombing Calcutta. I didn't get it. Then I took a look at my port, as usually there was no reported damage to the troops nor air units. I was aghast. I had overlooked how much shipping had made port, and anchored there. There were burning and sinking ships everywhere. I scattered those seaworthy, and buffed up my CAP. Many Allied merchies in Calcutta sank before their fires were put out. Time for returning the instruction. Perhaps, as a secondary affect, if I don't sink any ships that get through, I'll trash the port facilities. Airstrikes on the port are now daily sortees.

The USAAF flying out of Tjilatjap is now splitting its efforts to bombing Batavia, and airdropping supplies as well as flying CAP over Bandoeng. Much damage to port facilities, as well as hits on shipping are being reported at Batavia. Notably, more sightings and hits on a battleship. Can't fault the AI for that. When Force Z was initially hit, I limped it into Singapore. When Singapore was getting squeezed and threatened, Force Z beetled down to Batavia for a week or so for any repairs possible. Both capital ships eventually, separately made it to Capetown, and are now Homeported out of Cocos Islands.

Speaking of Bandoeng, it appears IJA forces there seem to be about two thousand smaller as well as one less unit. Hmmm.

The USMC's 22nd Marine Regiment disembarked at the Australian island of Ndeni (9 hexes SW of Guadalcanal). Joining the 22nd, is NZ's 15 AA Brigade. Following them soon are base force and engineers to build a airfield. Ndeni is within Espiritu Santo's air cover and when developed will almost be equivalent to Guadalcanal, (Air capacity 5) without having to fight for it. And Guadalcanal will be within fighter(?)/airstrike range of Ndeni

SSW of Espiritu Santo is my first CVE group. Three Combustible Vulnerable Expendibles (60 Wildcats and 27 Avengers) with three DDs (ASW ratings 8, 8, and 6) should be able to both protect themselves as well the increasingly traveled waterways. Their current mission though, is to bring in replacement squadrons for Big E and Hornet.

Also in nearby waters small fry are attending to other "housekeeping". Four APDs have been landing/reembarking the 1st Fiji Commando Battalion to/from islands around Espiritu Santo - changing red dots to green. Likewise DD USS Drayton and AP William W. Burrows transported the Kiwi Rarotonga Detachment and reoccupied the island of Funafuti (138,147), and are returning to Suva. My convoys, often with little or no escorts, were nervously skirting these Japanese islands. Now I know, hopefully, any "eyes" on them are friendly.

Speaking of eyes, March '43 closed with a large bang.

- - - - - -

Bridge on battlecruiser Repulse offshore of Batavia, Java.

"P-Wo!, called Captain Tennant.

"Sah!", responded Repulse's Primary Weapons Officer.

"Commander, the Flag will be making a small course adjustment shortly. As we pivot and follow Prince of Wales, the order to commence fire will break from her yards. You will instruct your gunners to use, what I suspect, is a pagoda mast in the centre ;) of Batavia as our aiming point."

"Aye aye, sir!"

- - - - -

I had assigned a port bombardment group from Cocos Islands. The heavies were Prince of Wales, Repulse, CAs Cornwall, Hawkins and Frobisher escorted by 10 destroyers. During the extensive/prolonged bombardment, the computer announced a magazine explosion aboard BB Mutsu. :shock: In the AAR, the Mutsu was declared sunk and the intel report credited cause of sinking to 15in/42 BL MK 1. HMS Repulse was the only ship in the action so armed. I presumed Mutsu was already heavily damaged from USAAF airstrikes. :shock: Weird.
Congratulations! You learned a very important lesson about ships in port. They definitely do need protection from enemy air action with both CAP and AAA.

Also congratulations on the destruction of so much window glass when the Mutsu blew up. Fires on board the ship from bombing could have resulted in a lot of system damage so it would be harder to fight the sudden onset of fires when the ship received so much loving attention from the Royal Navy.

Some ways to help keep your replenishment CVEs alive is to pair them with an ASW TF, add DEs to their TF, also have a CVE flying fighters on a lower CAP to shoot down the flying boats and float planes as well as bombers flying some Naval Search and/or ASW missions.
Attachments
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake   Napoleon.jpg
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake Napoleon.jpg (24.39 KiB) Viewed 1643 times
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
ChiefOC
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 11:05 pm
Location: Carrollton, TX

Re: Air Raid Pearl Harbor (Navy CPO vs Imp AI)

Post by ChiefOC »

Copy BBfanboy

Roger Ranger Joe. I believe I have a couple 4-Piper DE conversions in Soerbaya to back up my Baby Birdfarms. BtW, no joy finding out how to have torpedoes be auto-reordered.

And I appreciate all input, comments and critiques. Especially about taking my eyes of the troops back at home.

15 Apr 43

Well, a bit of a fustercluck that I am going to have to "cover up". ;)

I received another "Xxx unit disbands!" message and decided to track this one down, to see what is the deelio. Been a few of those lately which seem odd. Whoops. Seems in my initial set up @17 months ago, I was rather slipshod in sorting out troops in Alaska and far North Canada. I presumed supply would not be an issue and left them to their own devices. Ooops. There are several [more!] units on the verge of starving to death. I have three subs, headed for Japan being rerouted to pick up survivors at Nome. I have three subs that were in Adak, now loaded with emergency rations, likewise bound for Nome and all subs will carry home whom they can. I have a slower AKL loading a much larger load at Adak and then she will also head north. I have APs bound for several ports, including Nome, on similar missions to evac everyone. Units out of reach of a beach, such as Fairbanks and Whitehorse, are headed on foot etc to ports such as Anchorage and Skagway. Loaded AKs will soon be headed to all the the nearest ports of affected units. What a mess. If Nimitz finds out I will probably get reassigned to the Panama Canal Zone. Maybe Duty Driver for the Nurses?

On the other end of the world it's a lot different. NAS Exmouth is now a level 3 port and level 2 airfield with abou 16K of supplies. Port Morseby is still growing - now a level 5 port and level 6 airfield with @60K of supply. And my secret 24 hour pitstop at Tahiti is a level 5 port and level 3 airfield. Tahiti has a "Separate" Inf Regiment, a base force, two Seabee Battalions and of course her own Tahiti Inf Det. At hand are @7K of supplies and just shy of 29K of fuel.

SE of Midway another bombardment group, with six standard BBs, is headed once again to Wake. Meanwhile small Amphip groups from the States are headed to Pearl, where others are likewise loading/forming. D-Day for Wake probably to be scheduled early June.

I wonder how often it rains at NavSubBase Coco Solo? (Me imagining the backwaters of Panama)
Duty Driver
Duty Driver
Screenshot_20221203-184601_Gallery.jpg (86.73 KiB) Viewed 1621 times
Chief O'C
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”