No Strat Bombing in China

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5541
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: No Strat Bombing in China

Post by Yaab »

Anyway, it gives a totally new meaning to Fort Drum, doesn't it?
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: No Strat Bombing in China

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: JorMallester

As a noobie, I am just curious about this ruling for PBEM games.

Does it mean both sides are not allowed to fly Airfield Attack, Ground Attack, City Attack, Port Attack, Sweeps etc. or is it linked to just specific missions types? I'd imagine sweeps are not included but I don't know.

I just want to be sure about this rule if I ever agree to it down the line.

When I think of Strat Bombing I picture those big four engine / two engine bombers flying at significant altitudes.

It may sound like a silly question, but I'd really appreciate your help.

Thank you for your time!


Hi JorMallester,

Welcome aboard.

Most of my PBEM games have used this HR against strat bombing in China. My take on this (as an exclusively IJ PBEM player) is that it provides the Allies a modicum of supply in China and enables them to hold China longer than otherwise would be possible versus a concerted Japanese push there.

Without this HR in place, the Japanese burn out (through city attack) all the Heavy Industry and Light Industry targets in and around Chungking early in the war. This reduces 'supply' and helps starve out the Chungking (and neighboring) garrisons and makes capturing the Capital city a more manageable investment.

My take on this is that it is a help to the Allies to keep China in play longer than it would be without the (admittedly modest) HI and LI centers in China.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”