RHS 4.14 [Eratta; Chinese Army planning]

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design and the game editor for WITP.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
CobraAus
Posts: 2322
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 6:15 am
Location: Geelong Australia
Contact:

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by CobraAus »

v2.55 for CVO-RAO-BBO link is now in link page

This is still not quite 2.60, but it is getting there.

1) All allied submarines reworked for ammunition (to correspond to Japanese submarines) - and be in sync with the WITP "shots" system (instead of wholly fictional).

2) Reworking of Dutch abbreviations per comments from the Netherlands.

3) Correction of what may be the last remaining device issues.

4) Correction of many data field issues in many records - wether or not they matter - including many that disabled radar, weapons, etc.

5) Restoring 8 lost blimps and correction of all blimp "turret" fields (not sure blimps really have turrets, but in WITP they do!)

6) Correcting of ship upgrade paths where these were nonsensical.

7) Whatever I forgot to put on the list.

BBO changes

Major additions to Allied submarines and DE fleet

(Half of DEs are gone, slow ones move at full speed - twice installed power -
half of late war subs are medium instead of fleet - and all DEs have 3 inch guns
- to save steel for the big ships and also to provide 5 inch secondary guns for them)

BBO should release tomorrow at 2.60 level


Cobra AUs
Coral Sea Battle = My Birthday
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by el cid again »

Why have the following planes no rockets.

F4U-4 Corsair
F7F Tigercat
F8F-1 Bearcat
P-51B Mustang
P-51D Mustang
Beaufighter Mk X
Thunderbolt II
IL-2M Shturmovik

RHS is experimental. Rockets are experimental. They were actually first invented (in WWII aircraft use) by the British for use against submarines - and the game starts with the very first aircraft to use them: the Swordfish. [It isn't a torpedo bomber any more - by the end of 1941 it is considered obsolete in that role]. But the British went on to apply the SAME rockets for ground attack purposes. Since the experimental device is the same, and appears later in the war - largely on American planes in British service - it was easy to add them for that. [Note the is the ONLY role for which rockets are known to work: I have reports of successful attacks against surface targets using rockets].

There was a similar US FFAR - only larger - and I found a slot and added that one. And to be somewhat fair, I added a late war Japanese rocket - a small and short ranged one - yet it adds another application - bomber killing - a German concept also of the late war period.

Yet another application was later marks of medium bombers - American these - and you will note them on B-25G and H (I think).

We do not yet know if the rockets work? If they DO work - in air air combat as I intended - maybe they work too well? That is, without ammo limits (which at present WITP lacks for air combat), might the rockets fire over and over - 100 times? This may require adjustment - or even not using the devices at all.

One issue is that American fighters did NOT have rockets when introduced - so we go ahistoric if we put them on early models.

There are problems adding rockets - it requires review of the load calculations and it requires (often) the plane be rated to carry no bombs - so I added only a sample set for various purposes. I want to know if they work- and if there are any problems? They can be added to other planes - if appropriate.
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by el cid again »

You can also use NEIAF.

If English only readers complain too much - I will. But I think history buffs will like using "correct" abbreviations. Note many Japanese air units have names like daitai, sentai, shotai, kokutai, etc. No complains yet - and a lot of this is in stock.
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by el cid again »

4th: What slot number is Voykov?

slot 3811

She is Russian and should be set to "Soviet" - of course. Will be in future releases.
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by el cid again »

The Tiger Brigade was a Named Brigade of Regulair Infantry from the Netherlands. You can named this NEI or NE Tiger Brigade

The TO&E of Tiger Brigade was alike a British Infantry Brigade

The TO&E of the Marine Brigade was alike a reinforced USMC Brigade (3 later 4 Infantry, Engineer, 105mm Bn Art; Recon; Tank Co)

OK - look for this in either 2.57 or 2.60 - whichever is next.
User avatar
Jo van der Pluym
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Heerlen, Netherlands

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by Jo van der Pluym »

El Cid Again

There are equipment that you have give to the KNIL Mobiele Eenheid, but never had.

1. 6 pdr AT-gun (Dutch has 47mm AT Gun)This also for other KNIL/Netherlands units. Only the Tiger Brigade had this AT gun.

2. M7 Priest?
Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

It's better to be a Fool on this Crazy World
User avatar
Jo van der Pluym
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Heerlen, Netherlands

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by Jo van der Pluym »

ORIGINAL: el cid again
You can also use NEIAF.

If English only readers complain too much - I will. But I think history buffs will like using "correct" abbreviations. Note many Japanese air units have names like daitai, sentai, shotai, kokutai, etc. No complains yet - and a lot of this is in stock.

I think that the following is very strange.

The full writing name in Engels is Dutch East Indies
In Dutch it is Nederland Indie (Netherlands Indies)
The abbrev is NEI
Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

It's better to be a Fool on this Crazy World
User avatar
Jo van der Pluym
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Heerlen, Netherlands

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by Jo van der Pluym »

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym
- From 1 Augustus 1942 Korps Insulinde. A reinforced Company of Commando's, some Marines/Infantry.

Korps Insulinde is about 4 platoons, included 1 platoon Marines. Armed with Small Arms. Commander is Molders. In game terms 10 Dutch Squads, 3 Sapper Squads, 4 Marine Squad

Korps Insulinde had also receive parachute training, and did parts drop for recon missions. Some of the parachute trained made later part of NEI-FIS in Australia.
Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

It's better to be a Fool on this Crazy World
User avatar
Jo van der Pluym
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Heerlen, Netherlands

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by Jo van der Pluym »

Missing Squadrons

1. No 19 RAAF Sqn a Dutch squadron with Dakota.
2. No 121 RAF Sqn a Dutch squadron with Catalina.
3. 250th Mexican Sqn (USAAF) equiped with Thunderbolts
Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

It's better to be a Fool on this Crazy World
User avatar
CobraAus
Posts: 2322
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 6:15 am
Location: Geelong Australia
Contact:

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by CobraAus »

V2.56 minor update link posted on Rapidshare link page

Tests running while I worked today indicate I failed to get the unit prefixes perfectly -
so I went through the entire location file and renamed every unit without a proper prefix.

I also increased a number of Japanese supply sinks to full size - for a final test to insure the system works with the planned supply system (where supplies that make no sense generated by a resource center are "eaten" by a "supply sink").

There are a few more things to resolve - and no doubt a few I have not yet heard about - but first some sleep. Maybe we get to 2.60 tomorrow.

BBO changes

No changes at all here except the location file - that is this is the same as other 2.56 level scenarios - better unit prefixes and some expanded Japanese supply sinks. Of course, a few minor errors were also corrected - as always - but in this case limited to land units or locations (for example - 10 resource centers had become "American Airborne Squads" - and they are resource centers again!)

I failed to mention that at level 2.55 Russian submarines - which had gone missing somewhere along the line - were reinstated for RAO (and BBO).

Cobra Aus
Coral Sea Battle = My Birthday
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by el cid again »

There are equipment that you have give to the KNIL Mobiele Eenheid, but never had.

1. 6 pdr AT-gun (Dutch has 47mm AT Gun)This also for other KNIL/Netherlands units. Only the Tiger Brigade had this AT gun.

2. M7 Priest?

I guess I have command responsibility for RHS - but I did not give them these things! This was done for CHS - and I left it alone - pending correction. Corrected. The M7 - is a late war US SP weapon - did Dutch have such things? It is likely a changed device - I can look it up in CHS.
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by el cid again »

I think that the following is very strange.

The full writing name in Engels is Dutch East Indies
In Dutch it is Nederland Indie (Netherlands Indies)
The abbrev is NEI

Me too. Note that until corrected by you (to use the international standard) I was using DEI - makes more sense in English.
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by el cid again »

Korps Insulinde had also receive parachute training, and did parts drop for recon missions. Some of the parachute trained made later part of NEI-FIS in Australia.

I can make them airborne - but if part of ABDA they won't fly! If part of a different command they will.
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by el cid again »

1. No 19 RAAF Sqn a Dutch squadron with Dakota.
2. No 121 RAF Sqn a Dutch squadron with Catalina.
3. 250th Mexican Sqn (USAAF) equiped with Thunderbolts

I can add - but I need

1) Date entered to PTO
2) Machine count
3) Source of data
User avatar
Jo van der Pluym
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Heerlen, Netherlands

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by Jo van der Pluym »

ORIGINAL: el cid again
Korps Insulinde had also receive parachute training, and did parts drop for recon missions. Some of the parachute trained made later part of NEI-FIS in Australia.

I can make them airborne - but if part of ABDA they won't fly! If part of a different command they will.

Let them be UK Southeast Asia HQ. The NEI had surrenderd before they where ready for action (1 Aug 1942 columbo)
Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

It's better to be a Fool on this Crazy World
User avatar
Jo van der Pluym
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Heerlen, Netherlands

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by Jo van der Pluym »

ORIGINAL: el cid again
There are equipment that you have give to the KNIL Mobiele Eenheid, but never had.

1. 6 pdr AT-gun (Dutch has 47mm AT Gun)This also for other KNIL/Netherlands units. Only the Tiger Brigade had this AT gun.

2. M7 Priest?

I guess I have command responsibility for RHS - but I did not give them these things! This was done for CHS - and I left it alone - pending correction. Corrected. The M7 - is a late war US SP weapon - did Dutch have such things? It is likely a changed device - I can look it up in CHS.

They had only in the musea's the M7 Priest, but never in the armed forces.
Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

It's better to be a Fool on this Crazy World
User avatar
Jo van der Pluym
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Heerlen, Netherlands

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by Jo van der Pluym »

ORIGINAL: el cid again
1. No 19 RAAF Sqn a Dutch squadron with Dakota.
2. No 121 RAF Sqn a Dutch squadron with Catalina.
3. 250th Mexican Sqn (USAAF) equiped with Thunderbolts

I can add - but I need

1) Date entered to PTO
2) Machine count
3) Source of data


121st Sqdn (MLD) Ceylon from July 42 to december 44
12 catalina's from the UK
9 catalina's escapes from NEI
From december 1944 patrol B-24 Liberators

Source De Vliegende Hollanders (The Flying Dutchs)

19th NEI Sdn RAAF raised out NEI Transport Section on 1 February 44
Machine count ? Suggest standard RAAF Transport sqn.
Same source

same source listed 18th Sqn RAAF and 120th Sqn RAAF as 18th NEI Sdn RAAF and 120th NEI Sdn RAAF

I have made a mistake it's not the 250th Mexican Sqn, but the 201st Mexican Fighter Squadron

Here some links about the 201st
http://www.avalanchepress.com/MexicanAirForce.php
http://erickr0.tripod.com/
http://www.geocities.com/dutcheastindie ... adron.html
Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

It's better to be a Fool on this Crazy World
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4082
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym
121st Sqdn (MLD) Ceylon from July 42 to december 44
12 catalina's from the UK
9 catalina's escapes from NEI
From december 1944 patrol B-24 Liberators

Source De Vliegende Hollanders (The Flying Dutchs)

19th NEI Sdn RAAF raised out NEI Transport Section on 1 February 44
Machine count ? Suggest standard RAAF Transport sqn.
Same source

same source listed 18th Sqn RAAF and 120th Sqn RAAF as 18th NEI Sdn RAAF and 120th NEI Sdn RAAF

Just a question - how many of these aircraft and/or aircrew were originally in the DEI, and were evacuated? Or did all of the aircraft and aircrew come from Europe (presumably via UK)?

Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
Jo van der Pluym
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Heerlen, Netherlands

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by Jo van der Pluym »

ORIGINAL: Andrew Brown
ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym
121st Sqdn (MLD) Ceylon from July 42 to december 44
12 catalina's from the UK
9 catalina's escapes from NEI
From december 1944 patrol B-24 Liberators

Source De Vliegende Hollanders (The Flying Dutchs)

19th NEI Sdn RAAF raised out NEI Transport Section on 1 February 44
Machine count ? Suggest standard RAAF Transport sqn.
Same source

same source listed 18th Sqn RAAF and 120th Sqn RAAF as 18th NEI Sdn RAAF and 120th NEI Sdn RAAF

Just a question - how many of these aircraft and/or aircrew were originally in the DEI, and were evacuated? Or did all of the aircraft and aircrew come from Europe (presumably via UK)?

The crews of the Sqns in the RAAF are for the most part about 70 to 80% evacuated from the NEI. The others came from the UK, US West Indies etc.

Also late in the war when Allieds liberated parts of the NEI came more crews available.
Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

It's better to be a Fool on this Crazy World
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6416
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: RHSCVO and RHSRAO Minor Version 2.51 Released to testers

Post by JeffroK »

There wasn't a 19Sqn in the RAAF

I assume you mean 119 Sqn (NEI AF) RAAF

source: Australian War Memorial
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”