Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by elmo3 »

ORIGINAL: Captain B

Elmo,

Sabre 21 is right...time to prepare for the winter is now....not after it hits.[:-] 5 more weeks of good weather is probably a bit optimitsitc. Remember, your requisitions for winter clothing were denied...

We are preparing now in the sense that we are working on a defensible position by reducing the bulge. I was joking about getting 5 weeks of clear weather. But if it's 5 weeks of mud then yes we are in big trouble. Andy and Trey have a lot more experience with the game than I do so if they say I'm doomed then I probably am. You'll see soon enough.
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
User avatar
Balou
Posts: 849
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:12 pm

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by Balou »

elmo,

when looking at the AGC map, there are numerous sov airbases around. What is the AI up to and what could be the benefit of having that much airbases around ? They have to be supported somehow, or is it of less importance ?
“Aim towards enemy“.
- instructions on U.S. rocket launcher
elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by elmo3 »

ORIGINAL: Balou

elmo,

when looking at the AGC map, there are numerous sov airbases around. What is the AI up to and what could be the benefit of having that much airbases around ? They have to be supported somehow, or is it of less importance ?

The only way for me to know for sure would be to look at the other side. To this point I have not done that. If enough people really want to see the Soviet side I can post some shots. I'm almost afraid to look...
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
User avatar
SGHunt
Posts: 878
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Lancaster, England

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by SGHunt »

Those infantry regiments (from Pz Grp 2 I think - light green) you have strung out West to East along the North flank of your AGC bulge have not moved for weeks - have they not dug into create a high fortification level by now?    If not, how does this work?

Thanks for your continuing rapid responses to all our queries
S
Stuart 'von Jaeger' Hunt

WitE Alpha, Beta Tester

User avatar
Balou
Posts: 849
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:12 pm

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by Balou »

elmo,

yes, please, give us some real nasty screenshots about the sov buildup for Doomsday.
“Aim towards enemy“.
- instructions on U.S. rocket launcher
elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by elmo3 »

ORIGINAL: von Jaeger

Those infantry regiments (from Pz Grp 2 I think - light green) you have strung out West to East along the North flank of your AGC bulge have not moved for weeks - have they not dug into create a high fortification level by now?    If not, how does this work?

Thanks for your continuing rapid responses to all our queries
S

Most are level 1's, some of 9th Army (dark green) are level 2's. I'll have to answer how it works later if nobody else on the team chimes in. I've got car trouble this morning so it's problematic if I'll get in a turn any time soon.
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by elmo3 »

10/30/41 (turn 20)  We have started the assault on Leningrad with mixed results.  Even though we had the defenders outnumbered about 3 to 1 we broke even on casualties, and obviously they have more troops to replace losses than we do.  If teh AI is smart and swaps out battered units we probably can't take the city this year.  We would have to dig in and try to pry the hex east of Leningrad from Soviet hands next year to be able to attack from three sides.  We did push back the Soviets south of Pushkin to help straighten our line.  And we are building fortifications all along the front now as you can see.

Image
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by elmo3 »

10/30/41 (turn 20)  Forces of AGC liquidated the Soviet pocket as expected.  We have abandoned any thoughts of pushing north to a Velikie Luki - Rzhev line this year.  Not going to happen.  So we are digging in here too.  My plan is to move the armor behind the line and put then into reserve mode for the coming onslaught.  Even one more turn of Clear weather would greatly expedite my reorganization.

Image
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by elmo3 »

10/30/41 (turn 20)  It's been a while since I showed the area east of the Pripyat Marsh so here it is.  We took Gomel this turn and are digging in here as well.  I had hoped to take Chrenigov too but it is well defended and time is short.

Image
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by elmo3 »

10/30/41 (turn 20)  And last but not least is the AGS sector.  Here too we have called off and offensive operations and will start digging in next turn as soon as the line is stable.  The Rumanians are having trouble taking Nikolaev in the far south and I'm not going to subject my panzers to the wear and tear needed to go down there and bail them out.  They can sit out in the cold if they can't take the city.

Unless the Soviets try and early offensive before the Blizzards come the next few turns will probably be uneventful.  Losses an OOB shot coming in a while.

Image
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by elmo3 »

Losses and OOB through turn 20:

Image

Image

Image

There were no Soviet attacks in their part of turn 20. For turn 21 the southern two zones are clear and the northern two are mud.  Snow would be much better than mud for me right now
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
User avatar
Joel Billings
Posts: 33494
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Contact:

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by Joel Billings »

My observation is that Lee has played a more conservative game than others I've seen. The fact that he has over 3.5 million men and the Soviets have over 5 million at this time is an indication of this. I've usually seen higher losses, although as things keep changing with the game, it's hard to say if this is in fact just Lee's style, or the way the game has been moving. The Soviets with over 5 million are going to put the hurt on Lee in winter.

On another front, I think Lee misunderstands what Fortified Zone units will do for him. By using admin to build all of these, he is getting some additional labor squads to help dig. However, he's going to end up with a bunch of very inexperienced troops on the front lines instead of giving replacements to the units that need them that have high experience and would absorb the replacements at a higher experience level. Also, fortified units do not retreat, and can be a death trap. I think Fortified Zones can be useful for building fort lines in the rear when you don't have enough units to prepare a fall back position. But using them in the front is very dangerous. We'll have to see what happens. Also, these units cost admin points to build. I'm impressed that Lee had enough admin points available to create all of those units. But then, Lee has said he's not a micro manager (micro managing does expend admin points in many cases).
All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard
Smirfy
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 8:24 pm

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by Smirfy »

My observation is that Lee has played a more conservative game than others I've seen. The fact that he has over 3.5 million men and the Soviets have over 5 million at this time is an indication of this. I've usually seen higher losses, although as things keep changing with the game, it's hard to say if this is in fact just Lee's style, or the way the game has been moving. The Soviets with over 5 million are going to put the hurt on Lee in winter.


I think something aint working properly and needs looked at. I dont want to appear flippant but I have played bloodier games of paintball. By late November 41 the Germans had suffered around 750,000 casaulties which was a 23% of the forces involved. I'm not sure how conservatively you can invade Russia and hope to achieved losses under half that. German AFV and Russian artillery strengths after what has passed dont add up to what one would reasonably expect. On a positive the airforces seem to be suffering

elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by elmo3 »

ORIGINAL: Joel Billings

...

On another front, I think Lee misunderstands what Fortified Zone units will do for him. By using admin to build all of these, he is getting some additional labor squads to help dig. However, he's going to end up with a bunch of very inexperienced troops on the front lines instead of giving replacements to the units that need them that have high experience and would absorb the replacements at a higher experience level. Also, fortified units do not retreat, and can be a death trap. I think Fortified Zones can be useful for building fort lines in the rear when you don't have enough units to prepare a fall back position. But using them in the front is very dangerous. We'll have to see what happens. Also, these units cost admin points to build. I'm impressed that Lee had enough admin points available to create all of those units. But then, Lee has said he's not a micro manager (micro managing does expend admin points in many cases).

Now you tell me! [;)] I had the max of 500 admin pints and was actually losing them from not using them. Oh well if nothing else this AAR will show new players what not to do as the Axis. [:'(]
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
ComradeP
Posts: 6992
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:11 pm

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by ComradeP »

If both you and the enemy decide not to fight, you will obviously lose less men Smirfy. If the Soviets pull a limited Sir Robin, which the AI in Elmo's game has done, they'll lose less men, but the line will probably straighten about where it is now. Luftwaffe losses are below the historical level thus far, not sure about the Soviet air force.

Joel: I think Elmo's AFV losses, being on the low end, will really help him out. Keep in mind that during the actual winter offensive the Soviets might've had about 1 million more men than they have now, but the German units were also a lot more beaten up than they are now. If the Soviets can roll over near full strength quality Axis formations in winter, the game isn't historically accurate. They should be able to roll over weak, extended Axis formations, not fairly prepared near full strength formations unless they get encircled. Can you give us an indication of what the winter weather will do precisely? The Germans lost more men in terms of casualties (dead/wounded) to frostbite than to Soviet attacks for most of the winter, and the Soviets also froze to death by the thousands. The Soviets shouldn't suddenly turn into supermen in the winter. If the Germans and the rest of the Axis can establish a line, with perhaps a few fortification levels, close to converted rail lines, the Soviet winter offensive should really be far less ugly for them than in real life.

The fortified zones will probably at least buy him some time, as the Soviets have to take them out one by one, although I don't think it's a good idea to use that many of them and still think his line is by far not straight enough.

Edit after Elmo's last post: I don't like the idea of losing points if I don't use them.
SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer
Smirfy
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 8:24 pm

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by Smirfy »

If both you and the enemy decide not to fight, you will obviously lose less men Smirfy. If the Soviets pull a limited Sir Robin, which the AI in Elmo's game has done, they'll lose less men, but the line will probably straighten about where it is now. Luftwaffe losses are below the historical level thus far, not sure about the Soviet air force.


Not to be flippant once more but I think that kickabout in no mans land was Christmas 1914 and on the Western Front. From what I have seen the player has smashed fronts and the AI has reformed them (and done a good job) hence the large salients. I am beginning to wonder whether enemy divisions adjacent each other cause each other attrition? (does this occur?) If casaulties are only caused by deliberate player attacks then sure that goes along way to explain why the belligerents are getting stronger and the Russian front is safer than crossing the road. I have not looked at the historical losses of the Luftwaffe yet but at least they are out stripping production in an idealogical war of annihilation
User avatar
wiking62
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by wiking62 »

ORIGINAL: Smirfy
My observation is that Lee has played a more conservative game than others I've seen. The fact that he has over 3.5 million men and the Soviets have over 5 million at this time is an indication of this. I've usually seen higher losses, although as things keep changing with the game, it's hard to say if this is in fact just Lee's style, or the way the game has been moving. The Soviets with over 5 million are going to put the hurt on Lee in winter.


I think something aint working properly and needs looked at. I dont want to appear flippant but I have played bloodier games of paintball. By late November 41 the Germans had suffered around 750,000 casaulties which was a 23% of the forces involved. I'm not sure how conservatively you can invade Russia and hope to achieved losses under half that. German AFV and Russian artillery strengths after what has passed dont add up to what one would reasonably expect. On a positive the airforces seem to be suffering


Elmo is not playing the game exactly as per the historical course. None of us will. If you repeat the mistakes of the Axis forces in WW2 there is no point in playing the game because the outcome is known before you start. The whole point of these games is to give us armchair generals a chance to change history.

Elmo has used his panzer divisions conservatively, so you cannot expect to see the same level of losses as you would historically.
elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by elmo3 »

ORIGINAL: ComradeP

...

Edit after Elmo's last post: I don't like the idea of losing points if I don't use them.

The max number of points as of now that you can accumulate in the 41 campaign as the Axis is 500. I could have built some forts sooner so as not to lose the points that were accumulating above that number each turn. I also probably kept a few weak generals who could have been sacked which would have used some more points. One reason for putting a cap on the points is probably to prevent the Axis from doing what I did, to suddenly deploy close to 100 fortified zones in one turn.
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
ComradeP
Posts: 6992
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:11 pm

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by ComradeP »

I guess a limit would make sense, and I also doubt the average player will get close to the maximum, but having a limit will take some getting used to. In WitP, it's also technically possible to save so many pp's that you can pull a handful of divisions out of, say, Manchuria on short notice, so I do acknowledge the need for a limit to minimize gamey behaviour/abuse of the feature.

Can you show an organization screen for one of those fortified units? I see both the Axis and Soviet fortified units start as battalions (or maybe they're split up?). What kind of equipment can a fortified zone use, I'm guessing it's light on men and heavy on equipment like regular fortifications?
SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer
Smirfy
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 8:24 pm

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by Smirfy »

Elmo is not playing the game exactly as per the historical course. None of us will. If you repeat the mistakes of the Axis forces in WW2 there is no point in playing the game because the outcome is known before you start. The whole point of these games is to give us armchair generals a chance to change history.

Elmo has used his panzer divisions conservatively, so you cannot expect to see the same level of losses as you would historically.

I'm not sure I follow. What mistakes did the Germans make in 41 up to the point we have reached in game? I dont think they could have done more to inflict losses on the Russians. They still lost 3/4 of a million men in this period. I think armchair generals deserve to face a Russia that defends with the same fanaticism so we can actually change history and not teleport through it and come out with more men and tanks than we started the campaign with.

I do not expect to see exact historical losses but 56 AFV's a week lost along the entire Russian front to get to Lenningrad, and before Moscow I'm not hoping to see miracles either
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”