
Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
That is a big strike for 3 destroyers...


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (96.9 KiB) Viewed 312 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Patterson takes advantage of the weather to dodge the vengeful IJN bombers...


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (211.88 KiB) Viewed 312 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Invasion Perth!


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (144.44 KiB) Viewed 312 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Interesting to see what happens here...I like reserve no pursuit and might have gone a bit overboard here.


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (391.88 KiB) Viewed 312 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Not good...


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (82.31 KiB) Viewed 312 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
PM falls...


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (343.79 KiB) Viewed 312 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
21st IJA Div lands...


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (101 KiB) Viewed 312 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Minneapolis hit by Iboat...will have to divert.


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (177.77 KiB) Viewed 312 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Japan is driving their planes hard.


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (195.84 KiB) Viewed 312 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Perth...forts 2 (71%)
With this invasion...our hand is forced, and we will fight tooth and nail for Perth now.
I suspect a paratroop invasion to cut the rail line...Kalgoorlie is well held, but only a MG section at Cunderdin currently. Only 13 IJAAF planes here so far, but 45 Zeroes have arrived added to the dozen Nells. Their runway is still damaged.

With this invasion...our hand is forced, and we will fight tooth and nail for Perth now.
I suspect a paratroop invasion to cut the rail line...Kalgoorlie is well held, but only a MG section at Cunderdin currently. Only 13 IJAAF planes here so far, but 45 Zeroes have arrived added to the dozen Nells. Their runway is still damaged.

- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (308.14 KiB) Viewed 312 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
The KB is a fearsome monster...


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (464.67 KiB) Viewed 312 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Super interesting...I bet the IJA deliberate attacks again tomorrow.
I think only one unit came out of Reserve, the 4th Knil or was it the 2nd? I am thinking the 2nd was the only one in combat mode though.
I did put all the HQ units into combat mode to acts as soaks...all our units have less than 0 disruption and fatigue 4 or less except for the 2nd KNIL which has fatigue 9.
Perhaps there might be a surprise for the Japanese tomorrow?

I think only one unit came out of Reserve, the 4th Knil or was it the 2nd? I am thinking the 2nd was the only one in combat mode though.
I did put all the HQ units into combat mode to acts as soaks...all our units have less than 0 disruption and fatigue 4 or less except for the 2nd KNIL which has fatigue 9.
Perhaps there might be a surprise for the Japanese tomorrow?

- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (219.18 KiB) Viewed 312 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
I remember a developer saying units would auto-flip out of reserve mode if needed, not sure if there's a penalty.ORIGINAL: Lowpe
Interesting to see what happens here...I like reserve no pursuit and might have gone a bit overboard here.
![]()
Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
WITPQS, there is more to it than that...leadership tests, sure that morale, comes into play too.
There is no penalty the troops slide in for the final fight using what fortifications are present.
There is no penalty the troops slide in for the final fight using what fortifications are present.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
With todays carnage, the ratio of ship losses is under 4-1. Wish I could say the same thing for troop losses 132 to 2180. Plane losses roughly 1-1.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Oh, yeah, not discounting that stuff.ORIGINAL: Lowpe
WITPQS, there is more to it than that...leadership tests, sure that morale, comes into play too.
That's what I didn't know.There is no penalty the troops slide in for the final fight using what fortifications are present.
Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Delving deep into the pools and builds for devices.
Thanks Alfred, found the units that take the Lee.[&o]
Got my first Stuart tank in the pools for Commonwealth, plus the 7th Hussars showed up in Aden fully kitted out with them. [:)] Four more and I can upgrade my first Australian unit to them. Of course I want Matildas.[:'(]
Recon of the IJN attack on Sian shows 500+ afvs coming in one stack...I think I will revisit my decision to fight there and retreat. Hopefully it isn't too late for the 700 AV there. Just need one more day.
Thanks Alfred, found the units that take the Lee.[&o]
Got my first Stuart tank in the pools for Commonwealth, plus the 7th Hussars showed up in Aden fully kitted out with them. [:)] Four more and I can upgrade my first Australian unit to them. Of course I want Matildas.[:'(]
Recon of the IJN attack on Sian shows 500+ afvs coming in one stack...I think I will revisit my decision to fight there and retreat. Hopefully it isn't too late for the 700 AV there. Just need one more day.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
... I think only one unit came out of Reserve, the 4th Knil or was it the 2nd? I am thinking the 2nd was the only one in combat mode though.
I did put all the HQ units into combat mode to acts as soaks...all our units have less than 0 disruption and fatigue 4 or less except for the 2nd KNIL which has fatigue 9...
The HQ units don't necessarily act as soaks in this situation.
When confronted with a deliberate/shock attack, sufficient units in reserve mode will be automatically put into defend mode. This is basically determined on the basis of defending mode raw AV:attacking raw AV. Having HQ units in combat mode won't be substituted into the ratio determination as they have no raw AV.
From an army VP loss basis, losing non AV devices generates the same lost VPs as losing the equivalent number of devices with AV.Those lost defending non AV devices are most unlikely to inflict a similar loss on enemy devices as would the equivalent number of lost defending AV devices.
Alfred
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
ORIGINAL: Alfred
The HQ units don't necessarily act as soaks in this situation.
Alfred
Thanks Alfred, another of my misconceptions shot down in flames....back to putting hq units into Reserve no pursuit which does feel better.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
This is probably not optimal Allied play...not massing American carriers...but Saratoga is headed for western Oz to shepherd in reinforcements headed there...first a stop at Hobart which is building up to be a hub.


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (430.11 KiB) Viewed 312 times