ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
I can't explain the 'pleasure' aspect of why this is happening to you as I am not privy to Miller's motives.ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
So what pleasure can a person derive from taking advantage of that flawed system to gain a decided advantage - an unfair advantage, in my book?
However, from a military perspective, I don't understand why the IJ player would want to so strain their lines for comparative little gain. Taking (and holding) resource centers in China makes a lot of sense as the IJ, provided that the cost or risk is outweighed by the benefit. There's a number of resource centers already in hand or dot hexes that are lightly defended that merit capture and exploitation by the IJ. I just don't understand why someone would try to push the Chinese back to Chungking when there is comparatively little to gain from most of these Chinese cities.
Similarly, after the rail lines to captured resource centers are in hand, is it really necessary to evict the Chinese from Changsa in order to derive benefit from holding the rest of SE China? Take what you must, hold what you have and defend in depth should be the focus as the IJ.
I think some IJ players fight, pillage and advance because they can. They've got a bunch of cool toys (24/ 30cm field artillery, anyone?) to play with and can't stand the thought of not using that stuff before the allies come and take it away.
Not only is the supply / damage issue unrealistic for an indefinitely sustained IJ offensive, Canoerebel, but so is the operational tempo. I would bet that Miller has no strategic reserve, no training units rotating from the line, no units on R&R and the like. This is as unrealistic for the IJ in 1943 as it is for any standing army today.
Really well spoken. I see it exactly the same way.
And (although we don´t have much experience in that respect) I would bet that will hasten the Japanese breakdown from the moment the allies are able to take over.







