Ocean of (Allied) Blood.

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 2day turns

Post by bigred »

43-11-17: I hope my b25s are as coordinated as these helens.

Image
Attachments
a1.jpg
a1.jpg (58.63 KiB) Viewed 192 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 2day turns

Post by bigred »

43-11-17: Debut of the p70a w. radar.

Image
Attachments
a2.jpg
a2.jpg (63.94 KiB) Viewed 192 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 2day turns

Post by bigred »

and more p70. I am looking for some night kills. These are not full sqns of 12 planes, but rather detachments of 4. The effect of radar seems to be that all the planes of the unit show up for the fight.

Image
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Air attack on Woodlark Island , at 104,133

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid spotted at 15 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-49-IIb Helen x 7



Allied aircraft
P-40N1 Warhawk x 10
P-70A-1 Havoc x 3


Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-49-IIb Helen: 1 destroyed, 4 damaged

No Allied losses



Aircraft Attacking:
6 x Ki-49-IIb Helen bombing from 10000 feet
Airfield Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
35th FG/40th FS with P-40N1 Warhawk (10 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
10 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 9000
Raid is overhead
418th NFS with P-70A-1 Havoc (3 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
3 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 7000
Raid is overhead


Some CAP have air radar

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachments
a3.jpg
a3.jpg (53.46 KiB) Viewed 192 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 2day turns

Post by bigred »

The most odd event was the use of the emily as a night torpedo delivery system.

Image
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Air attack on TF, near Port Moresby at 98,130

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid spotted at 25 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes

Japanese aircraft
H8K2 Emily x 5



Allied aircraft
Kittyhawk IV x 2
P-40N5 Warhawk x 2
P-70A-1 Havoc x 1


No Japanese losses

No Allied losses

Allied Ships
AM Wollongong
LCT-361



Aircraft Attacking:
5 x H8K2 Emily launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 18in Type 91 Torpedo

CAP engaged:
No.15 Sqn RNZAF with Kittyhawk IV (2 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
2 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 10000
Raid is overhead
15th FG/6th NFS with P-40N5 Warhawk (2 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
2 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 10000
Raid is overhead
421st NFS with P-70A-1 Havoc (1 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
1 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 11000
Raid is overhead

Some CAP have air radar


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachments
a4.jpg
a4.jpg (66.24 KiB) Viewed 192 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 2day turns

Post by bigred »

losses for two days...looks like the p70 may be attriting the IJ night attack.

Image
Attachments
a1.jpg
a1.jpg (50.65 KiB) Viewed 192 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 2day turns

Post by bigred »

43-11-19: First a score recap. FatR nailed a LST respply covoy at Milne bay.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Milne Bay at 101,133, Range 11,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CB Kawachi
DD Asanagi
DD Yunagi
DD Okikaze
DD Yakaze

Allied Ships
LST-19, Shell hits 2, and is sunk
LST-22, Shell hits 4, and is sunk
LST-28, Shell hits 5, and is sunk
LCI-24, Shell hits 2, and is sunk
LCI-62, Shell hits 2, and is sunk
SC PC-1084, Shell hits 1, and is sunk



Japanese Ships Reported to be Approaching!
Allied TF begins to get underway
Japanese Ships Reported to be Approaching!
Maximum visibility in Clear Conditions and 53% moonlight: 12,000 yards

All the ground plane loses came from a bombardment at MilneBay and another At Buna by the Maya TF.

Image
Attachments
a9.jpg
a9.jpg (117.93 KiB) Viewed 192 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 2day turns

Post by bigred »

Allied sub north of Truk put two torps into a new jap carrier. It probably will make port.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Guam at 109,100

Japanese Ships
CV Renkaku, Torpedo hits 2, on fire
DD Suzunami
DD Tokitsukaze

Allied Ships
SS Sunfish



Ammo storage explosion on CV Renkaku
SS Sunfish launches 6 torpedoes at CV Renkaku
Sunfish diving deep ....
DD Tokitsukaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Tokitsukaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Tokitsukaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Tokitsukaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Tokitsukaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

Image
Attachments
a3.jpg
a3.jpg (59.34 KiB) Viewed 192 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 2day turns

Post by bigred »

The emily keeps making a night run.

Image
Attachments
a2.jpg
a2.jpg (63.75 KiB) Viewed 192 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 2day turns

Post by bigred »

And china keeps bleeding....the pressure stays on.

Image
Attachments
a7.jpg
a7.jpg (120.26 KiB) Viewed 192 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: Russian front

Post by bigred »

I see that not having a restriction on cross border transfer(manchuko garrison at full pp price) has a dramatic game changing effect. I request counter balance.

The russians would have been providing supply in real life. Request u activate the russians so that I can provide supply to china. The russians will not cross border.

Sadly , I want a no rules game but the effect(manchuko garrison used in china) borks the chinese in this senario. I must also apologize to you for changing the long run effect of this game. I should have assumed command using the original house rules.

I hope I have played a good china. It is possible I am to blame for the failure. feel free to publish this request on your AAR.

Sincerly,
Paul
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: Russian front

Post by bigred »

ORIGINAL: bigred
I see that not having a restriction on cross border transfer(manchuko garrison at full pp price) has a dramatic game changing effect. I request counter balance.

The russians would have been providing supply in real life. Request u activate the russians so that I can provide supply to china. The russians will not cross border.

Sadly , I want a no rules game but the effect(manchuko garrison used in china) borks the chinese in this senario. I must also apologize to you for changing the long run effect of this game. I should have assumed command using the original house rules.

I hope I have played a good china. It is possible I am to blame for the failure. feel free to publish this request on your AAR.

Sincerly,
Paul
FatR: I can't activate Russians right now, as I'll need to complete some troop movements before that, even with the assumption that the border won't be crossed. Will it satisfy you if USSR will be active by approximately January 10?
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: Russian front

Post by bigred »

ORIGINAL: FatR
ORIGINAL: bigred
I see that not having a restriction on cross border transfer(manchuko garrison at full pp price) has a dramatic game changing effect. I request counter balance.

The russians would have been providing supply in real life. Request u activate the russians so that I can provide supply to china. The russians will not cross border.

Sadly , I want a no rules game but the effect(manchuko garrison used in china) borks the chinese in this senario. I must also apologize to you for changing the long run effect of this game. I should have assumed command using the original house rules.

I hope I have played a good china. It is possible I am to blame for the failure. feel free to publish this request on your AAR.

Sincerly,
Paul
FatR: I can't activate Russians right now, as I'll need to complete some troop movements before that, even with the assumption that the border won't be crossed. Will it satisfy you if USSR will be active by approximately January 10?
Will it satisfy you if USSR will be active by approximately January 10? no, I want it now.[:D]
I note IJA army hq prep for USSR so your intentions are clear. I should be given time to relocate my troops as needed anyway instead of being forced to sit still and let u maneuver across the border for a best position...
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: Russian front

Post by bigred »

Tracker Intel: I need to switch to 2 day tracker so I want to save some data to this tread.


Image
Attachments
a1.jpg
a1.jpg (93.09 KiB) Viewed 194 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: Russian front

Post by bigred »

Email to FatR.
I do wish for u to activate the russian front to supply the chinese.

Situation dicates no futher garrantee.

If u undergarrison the front i will attack, which would be in the long term interest of the russians.

Because of the above political comments I hope u do activate the russians and I hope u do provide a goodly amount of Manchuko garrison to keep me from attacking..
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: Russian front

Post by el cid again »

ORIGINAL: bigred

Email to FatR.
I do wish for u to activate the russian front to supply the chinese.

Situation dicates no futher garrantee.

If u undergarrison the front i will attack, which would be in the long term interest of the russians.

Because of the above political comments I hope u do activate the russians and I hope u do provide a goodly amount of Manchuko garrison to keep me from attacking..

I have run many games with Active Russians and NEVER seen an Allied player act badly
When I pushed the envelope - invading Mongolia - they replied - locally - in Mongolia - until the cost
was so high I left the country

Russia and Japan cannot afford another major front in 1941 or anytime soon after that - so neither
should let it happen

But active Russians means the Japanese must garrison Manchuria - with planes not just troops - just as IRL.
IT also means the Allies can move things, control construction, etc - and that is simply the way it should be.
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: 2day turns

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: bigred

and more p70. I am looking for some night kills. These are not full sqns of 12 planes, but rather detachments of 4. The effect of radar seems to be that all the planes of the unit show up for the fight.

Image
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Air attack on Woodlark Island , at 104,133

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid spotted at 15 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-49-IIb Helen x 7



Allied aircraft
P-40N1 Warhawk x 10
P-70A-1 Havoc x 3


Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-49-IIb Helen: 1 destroyed, 4 damaged

No Allied losses



Aircraft Attacking:
6 x Ki-49-IIb Helen bombing from 10000 feet
Airfield Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
35th FG/40th FS with P-40N1 Warhawk (10 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
10 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 9000
Raid is overhead
418th NFS with P-70A-1 Havoc (3 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
3 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 7000
Raid is overhead


Some CAP have air radar

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Have yet to see one whit of difference in the capabilities of radar equipped night fighters over conventional planes. I have the black widow now along with night F6F, corsairs, and beaufighters. All have proven to be a non factor and have no more kills over the non radar equipped planes (what few kills there are) However, any fighter unit on night CAP regardless of type will severely lessen the impact of any enemy bombing attack. My only point being don't worry about night fighters as anything will do. They have no more use than any other fighter at night. Sad but true. It is an excellent way to make use of the small New Zealand fighter units or units with 2nd line aircraft.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 2day turns

Post by bigred »

This was my original letter to FatR.
I see that not having a restriction on cross border transfer(manchuko garrison at full pp price) has a dramatic game changing effect. I request counter balance.

The russians would have been providing supply in real life. Request u activate the russians so that I can provide supply to china. The russians will not cross border.

Sadly , I want a no rules game but the effect(manchuko garrison used in china) borks the chinese in this senario. I must also apologize to you for changing the long run effect of this game. I should have assumed command using the original house rules.

I hope I have played a good china. It is possible I am to blame for the failure. feel free to publish this request on your AAR.

Sincerly,
Paul

I see my diplomacy is alittle off the original base when at first I did recieve a warm response.
FatR: I can't activate Russians right now, as I'll need to complete some troop movements before that, even with the assumption that the border won't be crossed. Will it satisfy you if USSR will be active by approximately January 10?

Then i began to press my original position with this:
bigred: no, I want it now.
I note IJA army hq prep for USSR so your intentions are clear. I should be given time to relocate my troops as needed anyway instead of being forced to sit still and let u maneuver across the border for a best position...

This is where I may have goofed up:
quote:

I do wish for u to activate the russian front to supply the chinese.

Situation dicates no futher garrantee.

If u undergarrison the front i will attack, which would be in the long term interest of the russians.

Because of the above political comments I hope u do activate the russians and I hope u do provide a goodly amount of Manchuko garrison to keep me from attacking..

So give me an inch and i take a mile. In my first transmission I promised not to attack then later I said I would attack. Dont ever let me be a diplomat.
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 2day turns

Post by bigred »

Just converted tracker to 2 day tunrs. Intel made a auto load. never seen that before.

Image
Attachments
a2.jpg
a2.jpg (145.05 KiB) Viewed 194 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 2day turns

Post by bigred »

11-25-43: I am using my pre war DDs as sub killers.

Image
Attachments
a1.jpg
a1.jpg (80.83 KiB) Viewed 194 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
khyberbill
Posts: 1941
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: new milford, ct

RE: 2day turns

Post by khyberbill »

They have no more use than any other fighter at night. Sad but true. It is an excellent way to make use of the small New Zealand fighter units or units with 2nd line aircraft.
I agree. Any fighter on night mission appears to disrupt bombing runs with an "accidental" kill now and then.
"Its a dog eat dog world Sammy and I am wearing Milkbone underwear" -Norm.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”