ORIGINAL: Alfred
Merely being attacked increases their shot count. Shooting back just means they consume even more supply. Besides keeping them suppressed is more important than the supply situation.
Alfred
As always, thanks Alfred.[&o]
You imply that suppression is a greater malus than no supplies? By suppression I take it you mean disruption? I see where that is true in the times my troops have had high disruption the AV can basically go to 0, while low supply won't achieve that outstanding result.
I have been using a lot of strafing attacks (and also divebomber attacks) on ground troops in China, Luzon, and Burma/India. My thoughts were that it drains supply from already low supplied troops. Adds some disablements and disruption -- hopefully causes some morale loss too.
It is tough on my four squadrons of Nicks, but a good use for them since I have found it hard to sweep Jocke in this game since he seldom CAPs.
It also jives nicely with my holistic approach of using lots of different tools to get the job done.[:)]
I like to coordinate heavy strafing/divebombing when I attack as it seems to also really reduce the damage done to my attacking troops helping to accelerate ground offensive tempo with less time spent recovering or cycling units in and out...