ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: mind_messing
Yes, but they're there. If we decide tomorrow to start doing hip replacements, there's not a scramble to try and re-hire staff.
It strikes me as a decision that is sensible in the short term but will have serious consequences in the medium and long term...
Unemployment is tied to pre-layoff pay...not 1 to 1..but not catastrophic either. Even so, it is stressful and bad for morale.
Indeed. But hey, the bottom line is going to look better, so that makes it all okay I suppose?
Well, except that most are still "employed" and are still getting company supplied health care coverage and even a 401K (retirement plan) so there is no "rehire". All there is a phone call. Ask yourself if the taxpayers of Britain are going to pay idle NHS workers indefinitely? A bottom-line system is more agile. Mock it if you wish but the employers FUND the unemployment insurance system.
Yes, they'll pay NHS workers indefinitely. To suggest otherwise at the current point would be political suicide, if nothing else.
I'm not convinced a bottom line system is more agile, something this pandemic has driven home. Along with the "just in time" planning ethos.
Not to suggest that we need to go the Soviet method and have bunkers full of gas masks that are unlikely to be used, but there is a middle ground WRT key supplies.






