THE THREAD!!!

[Zorch]

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Orm



I don't not? ? And if I don't do not? Or do don't not? [&:]

I feel dizzy.

Sorry if I was unclear. What I meant to say was that no-you don't not fail to post on an unregular basis. Whether you don't do not or do don't not is irrelevant. I hope that clears some things up.

It sure did. You just wait a few minutes longer. The ride to the loony bin should be here soon.

I resent the implication that this thread is a haven for demented, deranged, and de-evolved...um...where was I going with this?

[Orm]

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy



Well, technically, it was in my queue of posts. I fully intended to post it, so it was hardly unintentional. Perhaps its positioning as the second post on the page was unconventional, I'll grant you. I'm in the mood for compromise today, so let's call it a retrospective U-INP?

Ok. Sounds perfect.

And, for information, I was intending to steal that INP from you, but my fingers failed me and I spelled something wrong and went back to correct it since I didn't want an edit in that post. And then I realized I was to slow. As usual. [:D]

Will you go back and correct the misspelling in this post too? [:'(]

Nope. That is the correct spelling.

[Chickenboy]

ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy




Sorry if I was unclear. What I meant to say was that no-you don't not fail to post on an unregular basis. Whether you don't do not or do don't not is irrelevant. I hope that clears some things up.

It sure did. You just wait a few minutes longer. The ride to the loony bin should be here soon.

I resent the implication that this thread is a haven for demented, deranged, and de-evolved...um...where was I going with this?

I'll apologize for Ormster. I'm sure he didn't mean to imply such a thing so much as state it categorically and without exception.

[Orm]

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Oh man! I just found an ideal bluetooth headset for Star Trek nerds (myself included of course):

Why would you want a snail crawling into your brain?

[Chickenboy]

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Orm



Ok. Sounds perfect.

And, for information, I was intending to steal that INP from you, but my fingers failed me and I spelled something wrong and went back to correct it since I didn't want an edit in that post. And then I realized I was to slow. As usual. [:D]

Will you go back and correct the misspelling in this post too? [:'(]

Nope. That is the correct spelling.

Your two uses of the word 'to' are one too many. As my follow-up post stated, your 'to slow' was one of the two uses of 'to', but one too many. It should have been 'too'. Not two too many, just one too many.

[Chickenboy]

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Oh man! I just found an ideal bluetooth headset for Star Trek nerds (myself included of course):

Why would you want a snail crawling into your brain?

It's one of them "Wrath of Khan" Ceti earworms, but in polymer clay as a bluetooth receptor. It's very cool (particularly if you're a Trekkie dork like myself).

[Zorch]

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: Orm



It sure did. You just wait a few minutes longer. The ride to the loony bin should be here soon.

I resent the implication that this thread is a haven for demented, deranged, and de-evolved...um...where was I going with this?

I'll apologize for Ormster. I'm sure he didn't mean to imply such a thing so much as state it categorically and without exception.

[Zorch]

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Oh man! I just found an ideal bluetooth headset for Star Trek nerds (myself included of course):

Why would you want a snail crawling into your brain?

It's one of them "Wrath of Khan" Ceti earworms, but in polymer clay as a bluetooth receptor. It's very cool (particularly if you're a Trekkie dork like myself).

I must have one!

[Orm]

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: Orm



It sure did. You just wait a few minutes longer. The ride to the loony bin should be here soon.

I resent the implication that this thread is a haven for demented, deranged, and de-evolved...um...where was I going with this?

I'll apologize for Ormster. I'm sure he didn't mean to imply such a thing so much as state it categorically and without exception.

What?

What are you guys talking about?

I was merely suggesting that we should take a trip to the comedy club The Looney Bin in Bozeman, Montana.

[Orm]

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy




Will you go back and correct the misspelling in this post too? [:'(]

Nope. That is the correct spelling.

Your two uses of the word 'to' are one too many. As my follow-up post stated, your 'to slow' was one of the two uses of 'to', but one too many. It should have been 'too'. Not two too many, just one too many.

Yes, indeed. But I have changed the spelling of the two uses into 'to'. So now they both are spelled 'to'. I see you use the old, faulty, spelling of the word to.

[Orm]

Yay. Dinner time. With the parents.

[Orm]

You guys post so much that there will soon be another new page.

[Zorch]

This thread has hit peak silliness.

[Chickenboy]

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Orm



Nope. That is the correct spelling.

Your two uses of the word 'to' are one too many. As my follow-up post stated, your 'to slow' was one of the two uses of 'to', but one too many. It should have been 'too'. Not two too many, just one too many.

Yes, indeed. But I have changed the spelling of the two uses into 'to'. So now they both are spelled 'to'. I see you use the old, faulty, spelling of the word to.

I'm sorry again. I meant that there were not two too many, just one too many. Or insufficient quantities of 'too'. In that case, it should have been 'too' few. Not two few or 'tofu' (that's something completely different) or even 'to few' (as that's also something completely different). But too few 'too'. Phew!

[Chickenboy]

ORIGINAL: Zorch

This thread has hit peak silliness.

Matey, I'm just gettin' warmed up. [8D]

[Zorch]

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy




Your two uses of the word 'to' are one too many. As my follow-up post stated, your 'to slow' was one of the two uses of 'to', but one too many. It should have been 'too'. Not two too many, just one too many.

Yes, indeed. But I have changed the spelling of the two uses into 'to'. So now they both are spelled 'to'. I see you use the old, faulty, spelling of the word to.

I'm sorry again. I meant that there were not two too many, just one too many. Or insufficient quantities of 'too'. In that case, it should have been 'too' few. Not two few or 'tofu' (that's something completely different) or even 'to few' (as that's also something completely different). But too few 'too'. Phew!

[Zorch]

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Zorch

This thread has hit peak silliness.

Matey, I'm just gettin' warmed up. [8D]

Be. Very. Afraid.

[Chickenboy]

Wow, I can't believe it...

[Chickenboy]

Another INP?

[Chickenboy]

Three in a row for Chickenboy?