ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: obvert
ORIGINAL: witpqs
Erik,
You are the one 'shooting digs'. Fauci has said, more than once and on video, that Trump did what he asked the first time every time (including Trump not doing things Fauci asked him not to do). And that specifically includes Fauci going back on air to counter the misuse of his answer to a hypothetical question, the very one which you include here.
Your default is 'centralize everything', that you've made clear.
There are no digs. The personnel stuff is because I'm fed up with the BS you and others throw ardour at anyone who presents something slightly different than your world view, and is met with outrage without any foundation in fact. My default is to look widely for expert advice, objective information and base my posts on the best science has to offer in the moment. There are no politics in that, no agenda, just trying to understand.
This is objective information I'm getting from sources that are verified. How do you explain what Fauci said in this interview?
Have a look. One week to have 60% less deaths in this phase. Two weeks earlier to have 90% less. Even if there is some error margin in those projections, I'd certainly take 40-50% less deaths. Wouldn't you?
You appear to be only looking at the deaths from Covid-19. How about the other deaths caused by the lockdowns? How about other lives ruined or not made better? That death of the young lady that I posted is tragic, the worse tragedy is that the family donates her organs and they are not used because of the lockdowns.
Without the lockdown those excess deaths would be more prevalent, as hospitals become less able to treat both Covid patients and other cases. The medical staff would also have taken a bigger hit, and many industries would have faced shutdowns anyway from people off sick, even if they weren't in hospital.
This is about starting social distancing earlier, saving lives by limiting the total number of infections, which would prepare much better for a quicker opening and less economic and social hardship. See Denmark for an example.



