Civil War 150th

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

150 Years Ago Today:

Near Aquia Creek, Virginia, President Lincoln had a day-long conference with General Ambrose Burnside on board the steamer Baltimore. Burnside's plan to move across the Rappahannock River before Lee could react had failed. Lincoln instead proposed a plan for the Army of the Potomac to hold Lee's force in place, while two smaller forces crossed the river miles to the north and south, thus opening the way to Richmond. Burnside argued against it, and for once was supported by General-in-Chief Henry Halleck. The necessary river transports could not be assembled in time before the winter weather began in earnest, they said. Lincoln eventually agreed -- but there was no counter-plan.


In the middle of the continent, a holding action was put into play. The Union had failed to take the capital of Arkansas, but there were still far too many Yankee troops in the state by the Confederate way of thinking. Confederate General Thomas C. Hindman had managed to assemble an army of 11,000 soldiers at Fort Smith, Arkansas. This was more than any of the individual Union forces in the state. Hindman selected the Yankees under Kansas General James Blunt, which were in the north-west corner of the state, for his first attack.

The trouble was that the two armies were separated by the oddly-named Boston Mountains. (It was a long way from Massachusetts, after all.) Hindman knew he would be vulnerable while marching his infantry and artillery through the passes. He therefore sent 2,000 cavalry, under one John Marmaduke, to engage and hold the northern troops where they were while he brought up the rest of the Rebel forces.

But Blunt (below) had "cut his teeth" during the struggle over slavery in Kansas, and was an aggressive commander. His force was already on the move from where the Confederate scouts had reported it.

Image
Attachments
general_blunt_f.jpg
general_blunt_f.jpg (51.06 KiB) Viewed 327 times
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

150 Years Ago Today:

The Confederate scouts had lost track of James Blunt's force in northwestern Arkansas, but Blunt had an excellent idea of the movement of the southern troopers. Therefore, it was the cavalry rather than the infantry who were surprised. Blunt's 5,000 bluecoats attacked John Marmaduke's 2,000 troopers at what is known as the Battle of Cane Hill or the Battle of Boston Mountains. With rifled muskets, foot-soldiers now had the advantage over cavalry even without the advantage of surprise. The Southern horsemen made a hasty retreat back towards the hills where the terrain favored them. After nearly nine hours of pursuit and skirmish, they made it. Casualties were remarkably light for the duration and numbers involved: the Union lost 41 men killed or wounded, while the Confederates lost 45.

Although the Yankees had got the best of the encounter, they were now in a vulnerable spot. Their advance had left them somewhat separated from the other Union forces in the area, and the Confederates still had 9,000 fresh men not too far away.
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

150 Years Ago Today:

General John B. Magruder ("Prince John") assumed command of the Confederate forces in Texas. It might have seemed a promotion to independent command. But for practical purposes, Magruder had been exiled to the hinterlands by Robert E. Lee. Although Magruder's theatrics had delayed McClellan's advance on Richmond, and quite possibly saved the Confederacy, Lee did not want defensive-minded generals. In his mind, the enemy army had to be destroyed -- if it was merely stopped, sooner or later it would start moving again.

Image
Attachments
genmagruder.jpg
genmagruder.jpg (39.34 KiB) Viewed 327 times
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

150 Years Ago Today:

The U. S. Congress re-convened, and received Lincoln's second annual message. Unlike the State of the Union Address of modern times, the missive was delivered in written form, and read by a clerk. The full text is available at
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/libr ... ument=1065
but it's about fifty thousand words in length.

One of the amusing parts to read is Lincoln's speculation on the population growth of the United States once the South had been brought back into the Union, though it was likely dull at the time. Few people were thinking as far ahead as 1930. There were parts to make the assembled Senators, Representatives, and spectators sit up and listen, however. Lincoln wanted to keep the process of emancipation going, but had to take into account the slave states still in the Union. Therefore, after preliminary points, he asked for three constitutional amendments:

[font="Times New Roman"]Our national strife springs not from our permanent part; not from the land we inhabit: not from our national homestead. There is no possible severing of this but would multiply and not mitigate evils among us. In all its adaptations and aptitudes it demands union and abhors separation. In fact, it would ere long force reunion, however much of blood and treasure the separation might have cost. Our strife pertains to ourselves——to the passing generations of men——and it can without convulsion be hushed forever with the passing of one generation.

In this view I recommend the adoption of the following resolution and articles amendatory to the Constitution of the United States: Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two—thirds of both Houses concurring), That the following articles be proposed to the legislatures (or conventions) of the several States as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all or any of which articles, when ratified by three—fourths of the said legislatures (or conventions ), to be valid as part or parts of the said Constitution, viz:

ART.——. Every State wherein slavery now exists which shall abolish the same therein at any time or times before the 1st day of January, A. D. 1900, shall receive compensation from the United States as follows, to wit:

The President of the United States shall deliver to every such State bonds of the United States bearing interest at the rate of per cent per annum to an amount equal to the aggregate sum of ____ for each slave shown to have been therein by the Eighth Census of the United States, said bonds to be delivered to such State by installments or in one parcel at the completion of the abolishment, accordingly as the same shall have been gradual or at one time within such State; and interest shall begin to run upon any such bond only from the proper time of its delivery as aforesaid. Any State having received bonds as aforesaid and afterwards reintroducing or tolerating slavery therein shall refund to the United States the bonds so received, or the value thereof, and all interest paid thereon.

ART.——All slaves who shall have enjoyed actual freedom by the chances of the war at any time before the end of the rebellion shall be forever free; but all owners of such who shall not have been disloyal shall be compensated for them at the same rates as is provided for States adopting abolishment of slavery, but in such way that no slave shall be twice accounted for.

ART.——Congress may appropriate money and otherwise provide for colonizing free colored persons with their own consent at any place or places without the United States.
[/font]

(Lincoln believed that blacks and whites could not live in true equality, and therefore advocated that the blacks emigrate to a country where they could have full rights. The black community was split: some had experienced the tremendous racism of the Northern cities, and agreed with Lincoln. But others maintained they were Americans as much as the whites, and had no intention of leaving the land they were born in.)

After the proposed amendments, the message became less involving -- for a while. But as the clerk reached the end, those present found themselves listening intently to some of the most famous and eloquent words Lincoln ever wrote:

[font="Times New Roman"]...still the question recurs, "Can we do better?" The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew and act anew. We must disenthrall ourselves, and then we shall save our country.

Fellow-citizens, we can not escape history. We of this Congress and this Administration will be remembered in spite of ourselves. No personal significance or insignificance can spare one or another of us. The fiery trial through which we pass will light us down in honor or dishonor to the latest generation. We say we are for the Union. The world will not forget that we say this. We know how to save the Union. The world knows we do know how to save it. We, even we here, hold the power and bear the responsibility. In giving freedom to the slave we assure freedom to the free——honorable alike in what we give and what we preserve. We shall nobly save or meanly lose the last best hope of earth. Other means may succeed; this could not fail. The way is plain, peaceful, generous, just——a way which if followed the world will forever applaud and God must forever bless.
[/font]


Image
Attachments
PossibleAnnual2.jpg
PossibleAnnual2.jpg (48.58 KiB) Viewed 327 times
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

Early December, 1862:

Robert E. Lee viewed the situation at Fredericksburg with confidence, and with a united Army of Northern Virginia. Stonewall Jackson had performed yet another rapid march with his "foot cavalry", bringing his corps from the Shenandoah Valley to the south side of the Rappahannock River. Although the Confederates were still outnumbered by the Union troops on the river's north side, they had the edge in position, troop experience, and above all in generalship. Lee and Jackson even started debating whether they should pull back so that the Northern supply trains could cross the river and be captured after the Southern victory.
Image
Map by Hal Jespersen, www.posix.com/CW


Confederate generalship was not so strong in the west. In fact, it can be plausibly argued that Lee was the only truly competent theater commander on the Southern side. (Albert Sydney Johnston was killed before he could establish enough of a record.) Since both sides were democracies, to be a successful army commander and still more to be a theater commander a man needed the diplomacy to work with the President (his commander-in-chief) and also with other senior government members such as the Secretary of War and the leaders of Congress. Joseph E. Johnston was a gifted soldier when it came to strategy and tactics, but he was as thin-skinned as Jefferson Davis in his way, and the relationship between the two never recovered from Johnston's being made fourth in the seniority list at the start of the war.

Nonetheless, Johnston was now the theater commander in the west, which covered the vast area from Georgia to the Mississippi River. As U. S. Grant was finding out on the other side, it should have been larger still, and incorporated the west bank of the Mississippi. Johnston set up his headquarters in Chattanooga, Tennessee, studied the maps, and realized that there were not enough Rebel troops under John Pemberton to hold off Grant's advance towards the crucial city of Vicksburg. Since there was a major threat in the east, and the Southern army in northern Tennessee was menaced by another large Union army, it seemed the best place to get reinforcements was from Thomas Hindman's army in Arkansas. Which was, of course, out of Johnston's jurisdiction.

Johnston therefore sent to President Davis, requesting the force in Arkansas. His proposal would not be favorably received. And indeed Hindman would need all of his men, for reinforcements were on the way for the Northerners opposing him.
Attachments
Fredericks.._initial.jpg
Fredericks.._initial.jpg (120.93 KiB) Viewed 327 times
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

150 Years Ago Today:

No battle plan survives first contact with the enemy, but the Battle of Prairie Grove / Fayetteville carried it to extremes. Confederate commander Thomas Hindman was deploying his 11,000 man force to attack James Blunt’s 5,000 men in a pincer move. The Yankees had wisely called on reinforcements, which were 100 miles away. This did not stop Union general Francis "Frank" Herron. In an extraordinary march of just three days, Herron brought his force to the scene. Half of his men straggled, unable to keep the pace, but it was the remainder who first encountered the Southerners.

Surprised, the Confederates decided to close up to receive the Union attack. They even sent a small cavalry brigade to distract the other Northerners under Blunt. (This worked, but only for a short time.) In the meanwhile, Herron’s Yankees piled in, but were repelled, and had to hold off a counter-attack from Rebels who outnumbered them over three to one. Somehow, as tired as they were from marching and fighting, they defended their position almost until sundown.

As Herron reluctantly started to consider surrender, he turned out to be the one rescued. Blunt’s Northerners had figured out that the sound of the guns was too much for mere cavalry, and came marching to the aid of their comrades. The Southerners turned to meet this new assault, and just managed to drive it back, ending the day’s fighting.
Image
Casualties were heavy, and nearly even for the two sides. The Union lost about 1,250 men, and the Confederates 1,300. (There does not seem to be a breakdown of killed, wounded, and missing.) However, the Northern ranks were increased that night by the men who had fallen behind in the punishing three-day march. The Southerners, on the other hand, discovered that they had fired away nearly all of their ammunition during the battle. A retreat was in order.


In Tennessee, the Confederates did rather better. John Hunt Morgan, probably the third best Southern cavalryman after Stuart and Forrest, was on another raid. His force engaged the Union garrison at Hartsville, catching them by surprise in the early morning hours. The Yankees never managed to rally, and after losing over a third of their numbers killed and wounded, two or three hundred scattered and the rest surrendered. Morgan and his 1,300 troopers had virtually wiped out a force of about 2,400 men. They lost only 140 in return.

It was a brilliant feat, and upon Morgan's return to Murfreesboro he was personally promoted to brigadier general by President Davis, who happened to be visiting the area.
Attachments
prairiegrovemap.gif
prairiegrovemap.gif (16.79 KiB) Viewed 327 times
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

150 Years Ago Today:

In the aftermath of the battle of Prairie Grove, the Confederates discovered they needed more time to pull back. They had spent much of the night doing things like wrapping the wheels of their cannon with blankets so as to be able to move out quietly, but the lack of forage for the draft animals slowed matters considerably. Southern commander Hindman decided to ask for a truce to bury the dead and recover the wounded -- and to cover the retreat of his guns and wagons.

James Blunt, who was now in overall command of the united Northern forces, suspected the ruse immediately. But the reasons given were sound: wounded men were not only dying of blood loss but freezing to death in the December weather. Also, pigs from nearby farms were now wandering into the area between the lines and eating the corpses. The Union general allowed a short time -- one record says twenty minutes, but the six hours given elsewhere is more likely -- for both sides to care for their fallen.

Throughout the war, the Confederates took care to glean the battlefields for useful items like muskets, cartridge boxes, canteens, and above all the shoes that they were badly short of. The Yankees were having none of it this time, however: the Rebels who tried it were arrested and sent north as prisoners. General Hindman did not protest, for six hours of daylight was all he needed to evacuate his force. The Union cavalry had lost heavily the day before, and so would not be able to mount an effective pursuit.
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

150 Years Ago Today:

Not to be outdone by John Hunt Morgan, Nathan Bedford Forrest left Columbia, Tennessee, with a raiding force of cavalry. His objective: Ulysses S. Grant's line of communication and supply.


Union engineers finally began the construction of the long-delayed pontoon bridges at Fredricksburg. General Burnside had decided to attack straight-on into the town after flanking movements had been blocked, calculating that Lee would not expect it. Lee indeed had not expected such a move because it was so clearly foolish -- but that did not mean he hadn't prepared for it. His Army of Northern Virginia was well entrenched in the heights outside the town, and there was even a brigade of Mississippians in the houses of the town proper who opened a deadly fire of musketry on the bridge-builders. Even at 400 yards (366 m), man after man was shot down, and the construction came to a halt.

The Northern commander ordered his artillery to open fire on the town, reasoning that the Confederates would be forced to evacuate the houses they were firing from. After two hours and 8,000 shells, much of Fredericksburg was in flaming ruins. But when the bridge-building resumed, it was met with more bullets from behind the rubble. Finally, a group of volunteer Yankees crossed the river in boats, and engaged the Rebels hand-to-hand in the streets. Slowly the Southerners fell back, and the bridges were completed at dusk. The Army of the Potomac began to cross.


Image
Attachments
Crossing_o..icksburg.jpg
Crossing_o..icksburg.jpg (122.8 KiB) Viewed 327 times
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
nicwb
Posts: 518
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:31 am

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by nicwb »

A nice ominous build up to the tragedy that is to follow......
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

150 Years Ago Today:

One wing of the Army of the Potomac occupied Fredericksburg. Shamefully, a number of Union soldiers broke into the houses left standing and began a rampage of looting and vandalism. Happily, most of the civilian population had evacuated by this time. Still, the level of destruction shocked a number of calmer Northern officers and men -- and nearly all of the Confederates watching from the heights beyond the town. The Southerners now had scores to settle.

Meanwhile, the left wing of the Federal army crossed on another set of pontoon bridges to the southeast of the town. They established themselves more quietly, but they were still under close observation by the section of the Confederate army under Stonewall Jackson. Union general Burnside surveyed the situation and came up with a plan -- but did not write it down in clear form and transmit it to his division commanders.


On the Yazoo River, the ironclad USS Cairo was steaming towards Haines Bluff, Mississippi. She went over a hidden mine or "torpedo". Confederates hidden behind a riverbank sent a signal through the wires, and the torpedo detonated. The Cairo took twelve minutes to sink, allowing all the officers and crew to get off safely, but the ironclad was lost -- the first warship to be sunk by an electrically fired mine.



Image
Attachments
Uss_Cairo_h61568.jpg
Uss_Cairo_h61568.jpg (108.77 KiB) Viewed 327 times
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

150 Years Ago Today:

The day in Fredricksburg, Virginia, began cold and foggy, which would have been an excellent opportunity for the Federals to advance without major losses from Southern artillery. But the main attacks did not begin until 11:00, by which time the fog had mostly lifted.
Image
Map by Hal Jespersen, www.posix.com/CW

At about 1:00 pm, a division of the left wing of the Union army charged Stonewall Jackson's line to the south of the town. There was an unforseen gap in the defenses: a patch of swampy woods where it had not been obvious that the Confederate lines did not meet. The bluecoats managed to find the gap and temporarily broke through the first Rebel line. But the commander of the Union wing, William B. Franklin, failed to commit further troops, though he had more than a full corps in reserve. Instead, Southern reinforcements piled in, including a force led by Jubal Early, who disobeyed Jackson's orders and put his men where he knew they were most needed. (Neither Jackson nor Lee paid any attention to the breach of discipline; in their eyes, a Confederate general could do little wrong marching his men to the sound of the guns.) The Northerners were driven back in disorder, and the Confederate counter-attack was only stopped by Union artillery.

Meanwhile, the Northern soldiers on the right wing in Fredricksburg proper had been trying to gain Marye's Heights on the far side of the town. But that part of the Southern army, under James Longstreet, was in a near-perfect defensive position. (Although they did not have Stonewall Jackson, they had an actual stone wall and a sunken road to fight behind, and plenty of artillery support.) After the first two assaults had failed, more Union troops began massing for another. Robert E. Lee was worried whether the heights could be held, but Longstreet assured him, "General, if you put every man on the other side of the Potomac on that field to approach me over the same line, and give me plenty of ammunition, I will kill them all before they reach my line."
Image

Nonetheless, the Federals attacked again, and yet again. Men who had disgraced themselves the day before looting the houses of Fredricksburg now rose to the heights of bravery. For sheer willingness to face death, the charges at Fredricksburg were unsurpassed in the Civil War. Charge after charge was mounted into the storm of bullets and grapeshot, and all failed. Finally, after mounting an amazing total of 14 charges in all, falling darkness and the pleas of his subordinates convinced Ambrose Burnside to call off the fighting.

A reporter for the Cincinnati Commercial summed it up perfectly when he wrote, "It can hardly be in human nature for men to show more valor or generals to manifest less judgment, than were perceptible on our side that day."

Many historians consider Fredericksburg to be the worst battlefield defeat ever sustained by the U. S. Army. The Federal losses are given as 12,653 men: 1,284 killed, 9,600 wounded, and 1,769 missing or captured. The Confederate losses were less than half, though still serious enough: 5,377 total, of which 608 killed, 4,116 wounded, and 653 missing or captured.

Image
Attachments
Fredericks..Overview.jpg
Fredericks..Overview.jpg (167.61 KiB) Viewed 327 times
FredricksburgPrint.jpg
FredricksburgPrint.jpg (301.85 KiB) Viewed 327 times
Fredricksb..atedead.jpg
Fredricksb..atedead.jpg (47.5 KiB) Viewed 327 times
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

150 Years Ago Today:

A tiny Union victory was won by a force of 10,000 men under General John G. Foster. This force was marching inland from the Northern beach-head on the North Carolina coast, on its way to the railroad bridge at the town of Goldsboro. The Yankees drove back 4,000 Rebels at Kinston in Lenoir County, inflicting 525 casualties while losing 260 of their own.


But all eyes were still on Fredricksburg, Virginia, where both armies remained in place, watching the other. Union commander Burnside wanted to mount one more massed attack at Marye's Heights, and to lead the charge personally. This was such a plainly lousy idea that even "Fighting Joe" Hooker spoke against it, in strong and insubordinate language. Finally, more diplomatic subordinates talked Burnside out of the plan.

Meanwhile, a Confederate Sergeant named Richard Rowland Kirkland was so appalled by the suffering of the Northern wounded in front of him that he gathered some canteens and went out in open daylight to give water. He had no flag of truce, for his commander had refused to grant it, fearing another Union move. But the Yankees saw plainly what Kirkland was doing and held their fire.
Image

Eventually it became clear that the Northerners would do no more attacking, and the Southerners (with the exception of Stonewall Jackson) were content to hold their line. The Union command requested a truce to recover the wounded and bury the dead, which Lee granted.

The news of the Federal disaster reached Washington, causing confidence in the Lincoln administration to plummet. When the President was told the story of the carnage, he was distraught. "If there is a worse place than Hell," he said, "I am in it."

Attachments
Richard_Ro..Monument.jpg
Richard_Ro..Monument.jpg (147.72 KiB) Viewed 327 times
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

150 Years Ago Today:

Abraham Lincoln had incorporated into his cabinet three men who had believed in 1860 that they should be President rather than Lincoln. Simon Cameron had proved unequal to being Secretary of War, and had been dispatched as Ambassador to Russia. Secretary of State William Seward had become entirely loyal to Lincoln; in fact, he would never seek another office after he finally left his position in 1869. But Secretary of the Treasury Salmon Chase's ambition was undiminished.

Apparently jealous of the close relationship that now existed between Lincoln and Seward, Chase had been spreading rumors that Seward was the "power behind the throne", and that Lincoln depended so much on him that he was failing to consult the rest of the Cabinet. (Seward had attempted to occupy just such a position during the Fort Sumter crisis, but it would seem that a year and a half of war had convinced him he did not want the awful responsibility.) With the news from Fredricksburg convincing many that a major change was needed, Chase had an opportunity to remove his rival. On this date, a caucus was convened by the "Radical Republican" Senators, who voted 13-11 to for a resolution calling for Seward's resignation. The Cabinet crisis of 1862 had begun.

Image
Attachments
lincolncabinet2.jpg
lincolncabinet2.jpg (46.67 KiB) Viewed 329 times
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

150 Years Ago Today:

General John Foster's force of 10,000 Yankees reached the important railroad bridge at Goldsboro, North Carolina. Although the alarm had been raised by the fight at Kinston three days before, there was still only a small confederate garrison there. The Northerners easily drove the defenders away, and burned down the bridge.


Ulysses S. Grant put a stain upon his record. He had been maddened by the trading in cotton and other items in his theater, and he determined to do something about it. Noting that many of the traders were Jews, he had an order issued that would have had the effect of expelling all Jews from his entire department:


[font="Times New Roman"]GENERAL ORDERS No. 11.
HDQRS. 13TH A. C., DEPT. OF THE TENN.,
Holly Springs, December 17, 1862.

The Jews, as a class violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department and also department orders, are hereby expelled from the department within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this order.
Post commanders will see that all of this class of people be furnished passes and required to leave, and any one returning after such notification will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permit from headquarters.
No passes will be given these people to visit headquarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits.

By order of Maj. Gen. U.S. Grant:
JNO. A. RAWLINS,
Assistant Adjutant-General.
[/font]

General-in-Chief Henry Halleck would rescind the order under President Lincoln's direction in January. (Grant repudiated the order later on, claiming that he had meant only Jewish "pedlars" and that his adjutant had made the order overly broad.)
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

150 Years Ago Today:

The "Radical" Republican Senators sought not only to get rid of Secretary of State Seward, who they believed to be lukewarm on the abolition of slavery, but to bring President Lincoln more into line with their ideas of running the war. They selected a "Committee of Nine" to go to Lincoln and demand a re-organization of the Cabinet -- meaning that Seward was to be dismissed and that great questions would be decided by a majority vote of the Cabinet rather than by Lincoln alone. During a three-hour evening meeting at the White House, Lincoln sought to reassure the nine that "there had never been serious disagreements" among the Cabinet members, and that the rumors of Seward's exceptional influence were not true.

As the Senators finally left, Lincoln conveyed the feeling that he was pleased with the "tone and temper" of the conversation. In truth, it seems most likely that he knew he had only bought a little time. He had not revealed that Seward, not wishing to cause a rift between the President and the Senate, had already submitted his written resignation -- which Lincoln was hoping not to use. He would need to move quickly, however.


In Oxford, Mississippi, U. S. Grant got some bad news. Although the War Department had not wished him to learn of it, he had found out that Major General John McClernand was coming to Grant's area to take command of an expedition against Vicksburg. McClernand was a political general, and Grant regarded him as unqualified to lead such a move. (Grant was not alone in this judgement.) So, Grant had ordered W. T. Sherman to collect a force of about 35,000 men, sail down the Mississippi River with the help of the U. S. Navy's river squadron, and seize a lightly held Vicksburg while Grant engaged the Confederate army under John Pemberton as close to Oxford as could be managed. He hoped to do this before McClernand arrived on the scene. But on this date Grant received definite orders from Washington.

The directions were to divide his army into four corps, and give the largest one to McClernand, when he showed up, rather than Sherman. Grant was not at all happy about either the command arrangements or the delay, but orders were orders. He promptly wrote the necessary dispatches to Sherman and McClernand. However, the telegraph lines had not been extended to Oxford as yet, so the messages had to be sent by courier to the telegraph office further north.
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

150 Years Ago Today:

President Lincoln held a morning meeting with all members of the Cabinet except Seward. He told them of the Secretary of State's resignation letter, and the meeting with the Committeee of Nine. Saying that he "could not afford to lose" any of them, he proposed a joint meeting with the Committee of Nine later in the day. Secretary Chase objected, since such a meeting was likely to expose the rumors he had been spreading about Seward. But the remainder of the Cabinet agreed, and so the meeting was set.

Chase's fears came true. The evening meeting ran five long hours -- until 1 a.m. -- as nearly all the Cabinet members stated that they were generally working well together. (Secretary of War Stanton remained silent.) Lincoln even managed to get Chase to concede that Seward had suggested a change to strengthen the Emancipation Proclamation, which disproved the story that Seward was not really against slavery. At the end of the meeting, Lincoln asked the Committee of Nine whether they still wanted Seward to resign. Four still did, which was now a minority, but not small enough to end the Radical Republican agitation. More, Seward's written resignation was about to become public, and people would want to know why Lincoln had not yet either accepted or refused it.


At Memphis, Sherman and the first part of his force boarded their ships and headed down the Mississippi, escorted by acting Rear Admiral David Dixon Porter and his gunboat fleet. They had not received Grant's message informing them of the change of command.
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Missouri_Rebel
Posts: 3062
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:12 pm
Location: Southern Missouri

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Missouri_Rebel »

Such a remarkable thread. Fantastic job Capt.
**Those who rob Peter to pay Paul can always count on the support of Paul
**A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have-Gerald Ford
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

150 Years Ago Today:

Secretary of State Seward had a considerably better day. He received supportive visits from three of the other Cabinet members, including Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles, who had previously disliked him. But now the Cabinet was rallying round its own, for it had occurred to several that if the Senate could demand the dismissal of the Secretary of State, none of their jobs were safe.

Meanwhile, the "Committee of Nine" Republican Senators were now aware that Salmon Chase had been duplicitous. They gave the Secretary of the Treasury a grilling, and by the middle of the day he was feeling so put-upon that he wrote out his resignation and offered it to Lincoln. Lincoln all but snatched it out of his hands, announcing that the note "cuts the Gordian knot. I can now dispose of this subject without difficulty." As soon as Chase, left, the President wrote to both Chase and Seward:

[font="Times New Roman"]Gentlemen:
You have respectively tendered me your resignations, as Secretary of State, and Secretary of the Treasury of the United States. I am apprised of the circumstances which may render this course personally desireable to each of you; but, after most anxious consideration, my deliberate judgment is, that the public interest does not admit of it. I therefore have to request that you will resume the duties of your Departments respectively.
Your Obt. Servt.
A. LINCOLN.
[/font]


In the western theater, General Earl Van Dorn had not done well as an army leader, but he now showed himself an able cavalry commander. With 2,500 troopers, he got behind Grant’s lines and descended upon the main Union supply depot at Holly Springs. The garrison, commanded by an incompetent and frightened Colonel, soon surrendered.

Van Dorn and his men went through the standard procedure for capturing Union supply centers. First, the liquor was poured out onto the ground to prevent drunkenness among the men. Then, the Southerners helped themselves to the clothing, weapons, and ammunition, transforming themselves from threadbare to some of the best-equipped horse soldiers in America in short order. After taking what they could carry, the rest of the supplies along with the storage buildings were put to the torch or blown up. (There was no shortage of gunpowder for the work.) The one omission Van Dorn made was not to take the medical instruments and medicines. The value of what was destroyed came to over 1.5 million dollars, a staggering sum at the time.

On the same day, Nathan Bedford Forrest and another force of Confederate horsemen were doing work less spectacular but almost as damaging to the Union cause. They got onto the railroad to the north, and not only tore up miles of track but cut the telegraph lines as well. In Grant’s words:

[font="Courier New"]"This cut me off from all communication with the north for more than a week, and it was more than two weeks before rations or forage could be issued from stores obtained in the regular way."
[center]--The Personal Memoirs of General U. S. Grant[/center] [/font]

His first advance towards Vicksburg was at an end. Now it was a question of keeping his army from starving.

Image
Attachments
ForrestVanDorn.jpg
ForrestVanDorn.jpg (57.07 KiB) Viewed 327 times
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
nicwb
Posts: 518
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:31 am

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by nicwb »

[quote]["This cut me off from all communication with the north for more than a week, and it was more than two weeks before rations or forage could be issued from stores obtained in the regular way."

--The Personal Memoirs of General U. S. Grant
/quote]

I wonder how much of this influenced Grant's final approach to taking Vicksburg ?
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Civil War 150th

Post by Capt. Harlock »

I wonder how much of this influenced Grant's final approach to taking Vicksburg ?

Quite a bit. And that conveniently leads to the next events, as described in Grant's memoirs:

[font="Times New Roman"] I determined, therefore, to abandon my campaign into the interior with Columbus as a base, and returned to La Grange and Grand Junction destroying the road to my front and repairing the road to Memphis, making the Mississippi river the line over which to draw supplies. Pemberton was falling back at the same time...[/font]

(By which Grant meant that the Confederate army he had hoped to hold in place was now retreating back to Vicksburg -- and Grant had no way to warn Sherman.)

[font="Times New Roman"]... my next order was to dispatch all the wagons we had, under proper escort, to collect and bring in all supplies of forage and food from a region of fifteen miles east and west of the road from our front back to Grand Junction, leaving two months' supplies for the families of those whose stores were taken. I was amazed at the quantity of supplies the country afforded. It showed that we could have subsisted off the country for two months instead of two weeks without going beyond the limits designated. This taught me a lesson which was taken advantage of later in the campaign when our army lived twenty days with the issue of only five days' rations by the commissary. Our loss of supplies was great at Holly Springs, but it was more than compensated for by those taken from the country and by the lesson taught...

...The news of the capture of Holly Springs and the destruction of our supplies caused much rejoicing among the people remaining in Oxford. They came with broad smiles on their faces, indicating intense joy, to ask what I was going to do now without anything for my soldiers to eat. I told them that I was not disturbed; that I had already sent troops and wagons to collect all the food and forage they could find for fifteen miles on each side of the road. Countenances soon changed, and so did the inquiry. The next was, "What are WE to do?" My response was that we had endeavored to feed ourselves from our own northern resources while visiting them; but their friends in gray had been uncivil enough to destroy what we had brought along, and it could not be expected that men, with arms in their hands, would starve in the midst of plenty.

[center]--The Personal Memoirs of General U. S. Grant[/center]
[/font]
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”