What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

User avatar
SLAAKMAN
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:50 am
Contact:

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by SLAAKMAN »

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/04/19/mossad-boston/

Israeli False-Flaggers Flown in for Boston Shoot-Out?

By Kevin Barrett

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09g5y2BhzCU
Update: The authorities now claim the Boston bombing suspects are Chechnyan Muslims. How odd! The US and Israel are allies of the Chechnyan Muslims in their fight against Russia. In fact, the US and Israel create and fund Chechyan “al-Qaeda” cells to conduct terror attacks against Russia.

So maybe these suspects are the usual al-CIA-duh patsies. And maybe Israeli “terror experts”were flown to the US to oversee the framing of the Muslim patsies.

The father of the suspects, like Mohamed Atta’s father, understands this all too well:
Father of suspected bombers: ‘My sons were set-up’

Posted Friday morning, April 19th, 2013

Were Israeli false-flag terror experts – maybe even some who helped pull off 9/11, the operation that Mossad operative Mike Harari bragged about – flown in to Boston to set up a shoot-out as dénouement to the Boston Marathon bombing?

At this point it’s just a hypothesis. But suspicions were aroused two days ago, when Israeli Police Chief Yohanan Danino announced that his officers had flown to Boston to “meet with Federal Bureau of Investigation agents and other authorities” to participate in the investigation of the Boston bombing. As RT reported, Danino dispatched police officers to participate in discussions that “will center on the Boston Marathon bombings and deepening professional cooperation between the law enforcement agencies of both countries.”

But wait a minute…why would American police need Israelis, or other foreigners, to investigate an American crime? And more pertinently: How did Danino know that there would be any Boston Marathon bombings for his team to investigate? According to RT, “Israeli law enforcement planned the trip before the deadly pair of bombings on Monday that has so far claimed three lives.”

When government agents pre-plan their trip to a crime scene, it means they – or their governments – had foreknowledge of the crime. One notorious example: Just a few minutes after the Pentagon was devastated by explosions on 9/11, FBI agents showed up at the gas station and hotel across the street and confiscated security videos showing what had happened. Obviously those agents were sent to confiscate the videos before the Pentagon had been attacked, by people who orchestrated the attack. It was a crime scene clean-up, not an investigation.

Another example: FBI agents left their offices in Minneapolis, Minnesota to drive to Duluth to investigate the scene of Senator Paul Wellstone’s plane crash. The problem: When the agents left, Wellstone’s plane had not yet crashed. They arrived at the crash site far too early – and proceeded to cover up the crime rather than investigating it.

Israelis, even more than the FBI, have a habit of “showing up too early” for terror events. The notorious dancing Israelis, Mossad agents who were arrested on 9/11 for filming and celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Center, had their cameras in place, trained on the Twin Towers, before the first plane hit. They even admitted their foreknowledge on Israeli national television, saying “Our purpose was to document the event.”



Latest Posts:
How are Takfiris, Zionists alike?
NSA spy scandal: It's even worse than Snowden says
West, Zionists Mortally Threatened by Truth


Friday, April 19th, 2013 | Posted by Kevin Barrett
Israeli False-Flaggers Flown in for Boston Shoot-Out?
Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on emailShare on pinterest_shareMore Sharing Services301

by Kevin Barrett


Update: The authorities now claim the Boston bombing suspects are Chechnyan Muslims. How odd! The US and Israel are allies of the Chechnyan Muslims in their fight against Russia. In fact, the US and Israel create and fund Chechyan “al-Qaeda” cells to conduct terror attacks against Russia.

So maybe these suspects are the usual al-CIA-duh patsies. And maybe Israeli “terror experts”were flown to the US to oversee the framing of the Muslim patsies.

The father of the suspects, like Mohamed Atta’s father, understands this all too well:
Father of suspected bombers: ‘My sons were set-up’



Posted Friday morning, April 19th, 2013

Were Israeli false-flag terror experts – maybe even some who helped pull off 9/11, the operation that Mossad operative Mike Harari bragged about – flown in to Boston to set up a shoot-out as dénouement to the Boston Marathon bombing?

At this point it’s just a hypothesis. But suspicions were aroused two days ago, when Israeli Police Chief Yohanan Danino announced that his officers had flown to Boston to “meet with Federal Bureau of Investigation agents and other authorities” to participate in the investigation of the Boston bombing. As RT reported, Danino dispatched police officers to participate in discussions that “will center on the Boston Marathon bombings and deepening professional cooperation between the law enforcement agencies of both countries.”

But wait a minute…why would American police need Israelis, or other foreigners, to investigate an American crime? And more pertinently: How did Danino know that there would be any Boston Marathon bombings for his team to investigate? According to RT, “Israeli law enforcement planned the trip before the deadly pair of bombings on Monday that has so far claimed three lives.”

When government agents pre-plan their trip to a crime scene, it means they – or their governments – had foreknowledge of the crime. One notorious example: Just a few minutes after the Pentagon was devastated by explosions on 9/11, FBI agents showed up at the gas station and hotel across the street and confiscated security videos showing what had happened. Obviously those agents were sent to confiscate the videos before the Pentagon had been attacked, by people who orchestrated the attack. It was a crime scene clean-up, not an investigation.

Another example: FBI agents left their offices in Minneapolis, Minnesota to drive to Duluth to investigate the scene of Senator Paul Wellstone’s plane crash. The problem: When the agents left, Wellstone’s plane had not yet crashed. They arrived at the crash site far too early – and proceeded to cover up the crime rather than investigating it.

Israelis, even more than the FBI, have a habit of “showing up too early” for terror events. The notorious dancing Israelis, Mossad agents who were arrested on 9/11 for filming and celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Center, had their cameras in place, trained on the Twin Towers, before the first plane hit. They even admitted their foreknowledge on Israeli national television, saying “Our purpose was to document the event.”

Another Israeli who “showed up too early” on 9/11 was Ehud Barak. As Christopher Bollyn writes:

Within minutes of the airplane crashes on 9-11, Ehud Barak (the founder and master of the Israeli military’s covert operation force, the Sayeret Matkal) was in the London studio of the BBC World ready to provide a plausible (and political) explanation to the world. Barak, the real mastermind of 9-11, was the first person to call for a “War on Terror” – and U.S. intervention in Afghanistan and the Middle East.

Benjamin Netanyahu was another “early responder” on 9/11. His first response, when asked for a reaction to 9/11, was: “It’s very good.”

Another example of Israel’s overly-rapid response to disasters: The Israeli team sent to offer “humanitarian aid” to Haiti after the earthquake was dispatched almost before the aftershocks had subsided. How were they organized so quickly? Perhaps the recently-assassinated President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela was right when he charged that the Haitian earthquake was created by HAARP or other artificial means.



Latest Posts:
How are Takfiris, Zionists alike?
NSA spy scandal: It's even worse than Snowden says
West, Zionists Mortally Threatened by Truth


Friday, April 19th, 2013 | Posted by Kevin Barrett
Israeli False-Flaggers Flown in for Boston Shoot-Out?
Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on emailShare on pinterest_shareMore Sharing Services301

by Kevin Barrett


Update: The authorities now claim the Boston bombing suspects are Chechnyan Muslims. How odd! The US and Israel are allies of the Chechnyan Muslims in their fight against Russia. In fact, the US and Israel create and fund Chechyan “al-Qaeda” cells to conduct terror attacks against Russia.

So maybe these suspects are the usual al-CIA-duh patsies. And maybe Israeli “terror experts”were flown to the US to oversee the framing of the Muslim patsies.

The father of the suspects, like Mohamed Atta’s father, understands this all too well:
Father of suspected bombers: ‘My sons were set-up’



Posted Friday morning, April 19th, 2013

Were Israeli false-flag terror experts – maybe even some who helped pull off 9/11, the operation that Mossad operative Mike Harari bragged about – flown in to Boston to set up a shoot-out as dénouement to the Boston Marathon bombing?

At this point it’s just a hypothesis. But suspicions were aroused two days ago, when Israeli Police Chief Yohanan Danino announced that his officers had flown to Boston to “meet with Federal Bureau of Investigation agents and other authorities” to participate in the investigation of the Boston bombing. As RT reported, Danino dispatched police officers to participate in discussions that “will center on the Boston Marathon bombings and deepening professional cooperation between the law enforcement agencies of both countries.”

But wait a minute…why would American police need Israelis, or other foreigners, to investigate an American crime? And more pertinently: How did Danino know that there would be any Boston Marathon bombings for his team to investigate? According to RT, “Israeli law enforcement planned the trip before the deadly pair of bombings on Monday that has so far claimed three lives.”

When government agents pre-plan their trip to a crime scene, it means they – or their governments – had foreknowledge of the crime. One notorious example: Just a few minutes after the Pentagon was devastated by explosions on 9/11, FBI agents showed up at the gas station and hotel across the street and confiscated security videos showing what had happened. Obviously those agents were sent to confiscate the videos before the Pentagon had been attacked, by people who orchestrated the attack. It was a crime scene clean-up, not an investigation.

Another example: FBI agents left their offices in Minneapolis, Minnesota to drive to Duluth to investigate the scene of Senator Paul Wellstone’s plane crash. The problem: When the agents left, Wellstone’s plane had not yet crashed. They arrived at the crash site far too early – and proceeded to cover up the crime rather than investigating it.

Israelis, even more than the FBI, have a habit of “showing up too early” for terror events. The notorious dancing Israelis, Mossad agents who were arrested on 9/11 for filming and celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Center, had their cameras in place, trained on the Twin Towers, before the first plane hit. They even admitted their foreknowledge on Israeli national television, saying “Our purpose was to document the event.”

Another Israeli who “showed up too early” on 9/11 was Ehud Barak. As Christopher Bollyn writes:

Within minutes of the airplane crashes on 9-11, Ehud Barak (the founder and master of the Israeli military’s covert operation force, the Sayeret Matkal) was in the London studio of the BBC World ready to provide a plausible (and political) explanation to the world. Barak, the real mastermind of 9-11, was the first person to call for a “War on Terror” – and U.S. intervention in Afghanistan and the Middle East.

Benjamin Netanyahu was another “early responder” on 9/11. His first response, when asked for a reaction to 9/11, was: “It’s very good.”

Another example of Israel’s overly-rapid response to disasters: The Israeli team sent to offer “humanitarian aid” to Haiti after the earthquake was dispatched almost before the aftershocks had subsided. How were they organized so quickly? Perhaps the recently-assassinated President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela was right when he charged that the Haitian earthquake was created by HAARP or other artificial means.

Another Israeli rapid-response to the Haiti earthquake was…believe it or not…hilarity. But you’re not allowed to see the proof.

Yet another amazingly rapid Israeli response: Netanyahu fled the scene of the 7/7 London bombings…before they even happened. Now THAT is a rapid response! The Mossad itself has confirmed that Netanyahu received a prior warning about the London bombings, and canceled his trip to a conference that took place next to Liverpool Station, where one of the bombs exploded.

So when Israeli “terror experts” get ready to fly to Boston to investigate a bombing, before the bombing has even happened, it does give one pause.

What could be the role of the Israeli team deployed to Boston?

Perhaps the bombing itself was set up by Israeli-linked organized crime assets, or Israeli-linked private military contractors. (One report implicates Craft International Private Military Forces.) Such people might not be in a position to completely control the investigation by US authorities, including the Boston police and FBI. So the Israelis would need to have another team, made up of police officials and “terror experts,” to interface with the US investigators, set up the patsies, and organize a dénouement. Their trip to the US would have been planned before the bombing, so they could “hit the ground running” in its immediate aftermath.

The fact that US investigators have put out two different, conflicting IDs of the bombing suspects indicates the possibility of such subterfuge. As the shoot-out reports began this morning, the AP headline reported: “Surviving Boston Bomb Suspect Identified as A. Tsarnaev, 19, of Cambridge, Massachusetts.” But other media reports identified the two suspects as Mike Mulugeta and Sunil Tripathi.

Problems like this in keeping suspects’ (or patsies’) identities straight are a regular feature of the aftermath of false-flag events. Many readers will be familiar with the case of the second Oswald involved in the JFK assassination. Another recent example: Confusion about whether the alleged shooter at Sandy Hook was Adam Lanza or his brother, Ryan Lanza. Another, less-well-known example is the way the original list of 19 suspected 9/11 hijackers was miraculously produced, hastily revised, and finally admitted by the FBI to be dubious. The original list of patsies, apparently prepared in advance by the perpetrators and produced even before the World Trade Center dust had settled, seems to have been primarily made up of identity theft victims. It included the names Adnan and Ameer Bukhari – whose names had to be hastily removed, and replaced by those of other identity-theft victims, when one turned up alive and the other had been dead for a year. But the new list was never subsequently revised – even after half the people on the list turned up alive and were obviously innocent. (The source of this information, by the way, is not a “conspiracy web site” – it’s a scholarly article published by Elsevier, Europe’s leading academic publisher.)

As of this writing, one of the Boston bombing suspects has been “killed in a shoot-out” while the other is still being pursued and/or shot at. Dead patsies are always convenient – it makes a trial unnecessary. And a trial, in which the suspect is presumed innocent, and in which the defense can use discovery, is not what false-flag terrorists want. Lee Harvey Oswald was shot down by mob hit-man Jack Ruby, and then Ruby injected with cancer, to prevent either case from coming to trial. The alleged 19 hijackers were rubbed out, one way or another. Adam Lanza is dead. That way, William Pepper and other truth-seeking lawyers can’t step in and represent innocent patsies like James Earl Ray and Sirhan Sirhan, thereby opening the cans of worms that the perps wish to keep closed.

The Israeli Mossad, the world-class A Team of false-flag terror, has admitted to bombing US targets in Egypt during the Lavon Affair. (Admitted, hell – they actually lavished honors on the perpetrators!) Mossad defectors like Victor Ostrovsky and Ari Ben-Menashe have revealed that virtually all of the high-profile terror incidents affecting Israel, from the Achille Lauro incident to the Entebbe hijacking, have been arranged by the Mossad. And, as mentioned before, legendary Mossad operative Mike Harari has openly bragged of orchestrating the 9/11 attacks.

And then there is the USS Liberty attack. Israelis obviously have no scruples about mass-murdering Americans.

If you don’t want people to suspect you of every terror attack, you should stop committing so much false flag terrorism.

Yowling about “anti-Semitism” isn’t going to cut it much longer.

And while you’re at it, maybe you should change your motto.

“By way of deception thou shalt do war” is a dead giveaway.

It almost sounds like a confession
Germany's unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economy from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.
— Winston Churchill
Aurelian
Posts: 4076
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by Aurelian »

Napoleon at Bay.

Napoleon's Last Campaign in Germany.

The Wages of Destruction.
Building a new PC.
Aurelian
Posts: 4076
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by Aurelian »

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN
Aurelian
We know because if they hadn't there would be no 16th Amendment.

At least those of us who read something besides conspiracy stuff know that.
OF COURSE BECAUSE YOURE SOOOOO OMNISCIENT. AFTER ALL YOURE IN LOVE WITH BIG BROTHER. WHAT PART OF 1984 DO YOU NOT AGREE WITH? [8|]

Every part that you think is true.
Building a new PC.
User avatar
reg113
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 10:42 pm
Location: MS, USA

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by reg113 »

'The Desert of Stars' John Lumpkin
"Life's a b***h, then you die."
User avatar
SLAAKMAN
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:50 am
Contact:

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by SLAAKMAN »

Orwellian,
Every part that you think is true.
You condone Obama's reign of terror. I think you lie.
Germany's unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economy from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.
— Winston Churchill
User avatar
Tzar007
Posts: 778
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 3:57 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by Tzar007 »

I very much like Atkinson's writing style, similar to Antony Beevor in his "historical narrative" genre.

Reading through An Army at Dawn, I realize how much I didn't know about the North African campaign. Like a lot of people, I focus so much on the Eastern Front or Normandy to the detriment of the other theaters... I expect I will learn a lot too when I'll attack the second book of the trilogy about Sicily and Italy.
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Tzar007

I started reading "An Army at Dawn", the first book of the trilogy of Rick Atkinson about the liberation of Western Europe by the Allies:

Enjoyed the first two of his trilogy. Looking forward to the third soon.
User avatar
Tzar007
Posts: 778
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 3:57 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by Tzar007 »

Rising Sun is a classic about the Pacific War. I was fascinated by it, probably because it's being told from the point of view of the Japanese. The part about how pig-headed the Japanese were about trying to keep Guadalcanal is incredible.
ORIGINAL: chemkid

hi there!
i'm into the 2nd half of the 1st volume of 'the rising sun' by john toland - pretty tough stuff...
...after reading the facts from the allied side.

cheers!
chem!

btw, the pacific war by john costello is waiting in my queue...
Aurelian
Posts: 4076
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by Aurelian »

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN
Orwellian,
Every part that you think is true.
You condone Obama's reign of terror. I think you lie.

Typical.

Not my concern if the answer is not to your liking.
Building a new PC.
User avatar
SLAAKMAN
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:50 am
Contact:

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by SLAAKMAN »

Orwellian,
Typical.

Not my concern if the answer is not to your liking.
Spoken like a true despot. Too bad we havent yet met on the battlefield.
Image
Germany's unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economy from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.
— Winston Churchill
Aurelian
Posts: 4076
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by Aurelian »

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN
Orwellian,
Typical.

Not my concern if the answer is not to your liking.
Spoken like a true despot. Too bad we havent yet met on the battlefield.
Image

You really should take your own advice.

"Battlefield".riiiiiiiight.


Building a new PC.
User avatar
SLAAKMAN
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:50 am
Contact:

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by SLAAKMAN »

Orwellian,
You really should take your own advice.

"Battlefield".riiiiiiiight
.
Image
Germany's unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economy from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.
— Winston Churchill
Aurelian
Posts: 4076
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by Aurelian »

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN
Orwellian,
You really should take your own advice.

"Battlefield".riiiiiiiight
.
Image


Wow, that's original.............

http://www.crank.net/conspiracy.html


Building a new PC.
User avatar
Hertston
Posts: 3317
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2002 3:45 pm
Location: Cornwall, UK

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by Hertston »

Craig Symonds 'The Battle of Midway'. I'm on something of a Pacific 'kick' at the moment and was looking for something suitable to read, and that one seemed to have very good reviews. Deserved, too; both very comprehensive and very readable.
User avatar
SLAAKMAN
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:50 am
Contact:

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by SLAAKMAN »

Orwellian,
Wow, that's original.............

http://www.crank.net/conspiracy.html
Image
Germany's unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economy from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.
— Winston Churchill
User avatar
SLAAKMAN
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:50 am
Contact:

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by SLAAKMAN »

Craig Symonds 'The Battle of Midway'. I'm on something of a Pacific 'kick' at the moment and was looking for something suitable to read, and that one seemed to have very good reviews. Deserved, too; both very comprehensive and very readable.
Thanks Mr Hertston. Now maybe you would wish to exploit that Jones for all things Pacific by joining a game of World in Flames on Vassal? [:D]
Germany's unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economy from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.
— Winston Churchill
Aurelian
Posts: 4076
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by Aurelian »

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN
Orwellian,
Wow, that's original.............

http://www.crank.net/conspiracy.html
Image

Awwwwww you're so adorable....

http://www.jcs-group.com/enigma/confide ... ckpot.html
Building a new PC.
User avatar
SLAAKMAN
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:50 am
Contact:

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by SLAAKMAN »


Hmmmm lets see here. I can either trust you, an ignoramus with no education in Logic and History or I can consider the research of Henry Makow, PhD. Which should I choose....Donny or Henry?.....

Image
Germany's unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economy from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.
— Winston Churchill
Aurelian
Posts: 4076
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by Aurelian »

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN

Hmmmm lets see here. I can either trust you, an ignoramus with no education in Logic and History or I can consider the research of Henry Makow, PhD. Which should I choose....Donny or Henry?.....

Image

Awww shucks, read the thread title and get back to me.


http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/10/17/ ... t-mindset/

1.Conspiracist Crackpots do not have a measured view of human nature and human ability. They are unable to realize that human beings are not capable of keeping the secrets and pulling the massive cons required of conspiracy narratives.

2.Conspiracist Crackpots do not understand Ockham’s Razor, one of the key principles of logical thought. Even if you explain it to them they’ll just say, “Aha! You contradict yourself. It says right there that the simplest explanation is only usually the correct one.” You pointing out Ockham’s Razor to them is probably the first time they have ever heard of the concept.

3.Conspiracist Crackpots tend to be obsessed with Nazism to one degree or another. The Crackpots see the horrors of Nazism as somehow evidence that grand conspiracies happen. “If a government murdering its people happened in Germany in the ’30s it can happen anywhere right now!”

4.Conspiracist Crackpots are oblivious to the fact that their conspiracy of choice tends to relate directly to their political views. Not only that but their embrace of the conspiracy actually flows out of their political ideology. Every single Birther is opposed to Barack Obama on policy grounds. Truthers who think 9/11 was an “inside job” done by the government are almost always politically opposed to the government. Leftist Truthers hate America and Right-wing Truthers hate the federal government. Holocaust deniers hate Jews. Afrocentric leftists who think the government engineered AIDS and crack also think America is fundamentally racist. You can do this with virtually every conspiracy.

5.Crackpot conspiracists are unqualified amateurs who rarely have any expertise to analyze the events they’re talking about. Yet they have the audacity to come to conclusions that run counter to the majority of trained experts.

6.Crackpot conspiracists do not understand that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. A youtube video proves nothing. What kind of mind actually gets changed as a result of some video on the internet?

7.Crackpot conspiracists do not dialogue. There’s no reason for it. They have the Truth and are there to preach, they’re not “questioning” or “chasing truths.” They’ve already found the answers. They are in no way “open minded.” Hence they won’t really answer your questions. They’ll just change the subject.

8.Crackpot conspiracists usually believe in more than one conspiracy. It’s no coincidence that perennial third-party candidate Ed Noonan, who showed up on one of the threads, is both a proud Birther and Truther.

9.Crackpot conspiracists are not able to see ambiguity or complexity. In my dialogue with the Truther he said multiple times that I had the fallacy of believing that there weren’t any conspiracies. I never said that. Conspiracies do in fact happen. 9/11 was indeed a conspiracy. Al Qaeda conspired in secret to attack America and they did it. Rational people understand the difference, though, between rationally acknowledging small, individual conspiracies and irrationally seeing grand conspiracies that are unsupported by adequate evidence.
Building a new PC.
User avatar
SLAAKMAN
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:50 am
Contact:

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by SLAAKMAN »

Orwellian,
Awww shucks, guess the truth hurts.
Oh dear, Im just sooooo wounded.
Image
Germany's unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economy from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.
— Winston Churchill
User avatar
SLAAKMAN
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:50 am
Contact:

RE: What Book Are You Reading at the moment?

Post by SLAAKMAN »

Orwellian,
Awww shucks, read the thread title and get back to me.

Its the 4th of July, not that a Commie like you would notice. Im going fishing.
Image
Germany's unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economy from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.
— Winston Churchill
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”