ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
Bullwinkle is the Great Oz? And what exactly is the Moose doing behind that curtain?
Magic tricks. "Nothin' up my sleeve! Presto!"
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
Bullwinkle is the Great Oz? And what exactly is the Moose doing behind that curtain?
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
I wouldn't have pulled the trigger on Big Tent if KB was still intact. Not even close. I'd be content to work closer to home. I might've targeted the Ellice Islands (Funafuti, etc.) or perhaps tried to hit Kwaj or Roi or Tabituea. But I wouldn't be venturing deep.



I do believe that was me although I did not specify targets. I had recommended a Fletcher or two, working torpedoes , good radar, long range and fast. These things are murder in 1944 [:)](this was a notion given by one of you readers yesterday
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
Until the Allies win the decisive carrier battle, they have to strike with total surprise (Sumatra campaign, Aleutians campaign, first Marshalls campaign) or in fairly friendly waters (second Marshalls campaign). At least that's the case in '42 and '43.
Big Tent couldn't have achieved total surprise (John has been following the herd since French Frigate Shoals in October!), nor was it aimed at friendly waters. Can you image a massive carrier battle near Truk in which John had equal or greater numbers and Allied wounded and cripples had no viable vectors to get home?
No, Big Tent wouldn't have happened had there not been a Great Naval Battle of Wake Island from September 19 to September 23, 1943.
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
He can run the carriers at flank from Manus and strike the Biak area on the same day. Beware.
Edit: Assuming 8-hex full speed for him, he can actually reach all the way to Sansapor with an 8-hex strike.
ORIGINAL: DW
Sorry... I should have been more clear.
I was actually after Capt. Mandrake's thoughts. He's done an number of advances along that axis, snatching poorly defended Japanese bases one after another with minimal forces and covered by minimal naval power.
To an observer like myself, his advances seem as magical as his nom de guerre would imply, and the Japanese player seems absolutely helpless to do anything meaningful to slow him down.
But, I don't recall him ever attempting such and advance with KB as strong as it currently is in your game.
Still, the Death Star is likely powerful enough to keep KB at bay if you did attempt such a move.
I was just wondering if he thought such an advance was still viable considering the balance of power in your game (that he's encouraging you to try it indicates he thinks it is) and what his reasoning is.
ORIGINAL: DW
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
Until the Allies win the decisive carrier battle, they have to strike with total surprise (Sumatra campaign, Aleutians campaign, first Marshalls campaign) or in fairly friendly waters (second Marshalls campaign). At least that's the case in '42 and '43.
Big Tent couldn't have achieved total surprise (John has been following the herd since French Frigate Shoals in October!), nor was it aimed at friendly waters. Can you image a massive carrier battle near Truk in which John had equal or greater numbers and Allied wounded and cripples had no viable vectors to get home?
No, Big Tent wouldn't have happened had there not been a Great Naval Battle of Wake Island from September 19 to September 23, 1943.
Sorry... I should have been more clear.
I was actually after Capt. Mandrake's thoughts. He's done an number of advances along that axis, snatching poorly defended Japanese bases one after another with minimal forces and covered by minimal naval power.
To an observer like myself, his advances seem as magical as his nom de guerre would imply, and the Japanese player seems absolutely helpless to do anything meaningful to slow him down.
But, I don't recall him ever attempting such and advance with KB as strong as it currently is in your game.
Still, the Death Star is likely powerful enough to keep KB at bay if you did attempt such a move.
I was just wondering if he thought such an advance was still viable considering the balance of power in your game (that he's encouraging you to try it indicates he thinks it is) and what his reasoning is.

Heh. I thought your description of my games didn't quite match my memory of my games, but I went with it thinking, "Well, he's entitled to his perception."