ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
Included in Soviet analysis of Luftwaffe strength were identification of flak concentrations as well as areas of more intense air interdiction. Knowing and documenting flak concentrations allowed the VVS to target areas for ground attack where weaker AA concentrations were prevalent. Here was a sample analysis from week 48.
This is interesting. One thing that might be gleaned from this is that recon missions even if everybody is shot down .. still gives information.
Besides Telemecus inquiry ..
My concentration of 88's has nothing strategic in mind as far as airpower but I can now see huge strategic implications of my tactics. up
My concentration of 88's are more focused on matching up with your (EvK's) T34's. The German superman Pz III J's and H's are no match for the T34. This was a source of debate for the German side. If you break things down I calculated about 60 devices full strength (T34/KV1) that the 50mm gun could not reasonably affect. There are 635 devices/squads that could matched up against any one of my devices/squads. Assuming independent trials, each 88mm shot had a 16% shot of engaging an AFV and about 9% of engaging something my AFV's cannot affect. That is assuming full strength. That is also not assuming all those additional tubes that support units add to the fray. However, from the big picture perspective we got a good sizable number of T34's.
One thing that is not on your map is the 20mm quads. They are quite effective vs Cavalry and was the mainstay of resistance during the winter. The 20mm quad is also effective vs IL2's ...more than 88mm ..
Too bad the game broke up ..

It is clear by that map that you all were maturing a strategy and put a great deal of time into it ...
"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"