ORIGINAL: Alfred
I cannot imagine that a moderator has intervened:
(1) no obvious grounds exist for such intervention,
(2) moderators always make an announcement when they intervene (a) to announce their action and (b) to explain what consituted the objectionable behaviour and thus prevent it from reoccurring.
Consequently that leaves the other 2 possibilities mentioned by Roger Neilson II. Either one is quite objectionable.
If peeping into his opponent's AAR (inter alia) was sufficient to get Marky banned last year, why should similar behaviour here not warrant some action from the moderators.
Alfred
1. i was not peeping
2. thats not wat got me banned
3. i was banned for getting overzealous and tellign jwilkerson to shove it, and thankfully the waters are calm between us, cuz i said it in a moment of frustration and anger, becuz i was, and continue to be, targeted on these forums
4. i forget wat it said in the headline that made me finally peak, but i got a message from DB saying he would have to think about continuing the game, because i said:
1. dont do anything truly cheap or gamey
2. dont cut off my indian/burmese army with a para unit of 3000 or so men
i dont mean to be rude, but please get ur facts straight before you start typing, especially when its pertinent to sum1s reputation
[:-]
that being said, and all in all, no harm done, all is forgiven
