So, There I Was...

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
morganbj
Posts: 3472
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 1:36 am
Location: Mosquito Bite, Texas

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by morganbj »

"Cluster ducks?"  I kinda remember the term as something a little different. [;)]
 
And, "fubar."  Ahhh, brings back some bad memories.
 
Occasionally, and randomly, problems and solutions collide. The probability of these collisions is inversely related to the number of committees working on the solutions. -- Me.
User avatar
Chad Harrison
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:07 pm
Location: Boise, ID - USA

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by Chad Harrison »

ORIGINAL: pad152

ORIGINAL: Terminus

It will be left in.

Sorry but, this is a game killer for me, good luck with the project

My ability to detect sarcasim is broken this morning. Pad, were you serious?
John Lansford
Posts: 2664
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 12:40 am

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by John Lansford »

ORIGINAL: Dili

And beware of Godzilla!

Nah, he'd better not show up in AE; no nuclear underwater tests yet!

Seriously, though, does anyone have the numbers of how many ships ran aground, had magazine explosions (Mutsu's the only one I can think of) or collided with another ship (that one happened more often than once or twice) in the Pacific during WWII?
User avatar
PeteG662
Posts: 1263
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:01 pm

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by PeteG662 »

In the battle of Midway and its immediate aftermath, there were two collisions between ships. One were the two Jap cruisers near Midway trying to avoid a surfaced American sub at night and the second were two Jap destroyers heading back to Japan after the battle. That was all in the span of one week in real time in 1942. Not sure if there can be any statistical inference from this but it would appear that this could happen at any point and time.
 
Pete
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by m10bob »

ORIGINAL: Tallyman662

In the battle of Midway and its immediate aftermath, there were two collisions between ships. One were the two Jap cruisers near Midway trying to avoid a surfaced American sub at night and the second were two Jap destroyers heading back to Japan after the battle. That was all in the span of one week in real time in 1942. Not sure if there can be any statistical inference from this but it would appear that this could happen at any point and time.

Pete


IIRC Tameicha Hara mentioned an incident in his book.
Image

John Lansford
Posts: 2664
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 12:40 am

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by John Lansford »

Nachi and Mogami collided during the Leyte Gulf battle as well, and didn't HMS King George V run over a destroyer?  Not in the Pacific, but Prinz Eugen nearly sliced a KM CL in half too.
 
Even with all these examples, the numbers of ships colliding with other ships is fairly low when you consider just how many ships were out there at one time.  The "bumps" I don't count, just the "OMG look what you did!" type collisions...
mdiehl
Posts: 3969
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by mdiehl »

IIRC Mogami ran into a vessel in 1939 or 1940 as well.
Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?
User avatar
PeteG662
Posts: 1263
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:01 pm

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by PeteG662 »

It was Mogami and Mikuma at Midway IIRC
User avatar
Howard Mitchell
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2002 11:41 am
Location: Blighty

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by Howard Mitchell »

ORIGINAL: John Lansford

... didn't HMS King George V run over a destroyer? 

HMS King George V collided with and sank the destroyer HMS Punjabi on 1 May 1942 in dense fog, putting a 40 foot gash in her bow and, as depth charges from the sinking destroyer exploded as KGV's stern passed over them, damaging the electrical systems, machinery foundations, etc. She needed nearly two months of repairs.

And for those worried about their carriers suddenly exploding for no readily apparent reason, for goodness' sake don't look up HMS Dasher...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Dasher_(D37)

While the battles the British fight may differ in the widest possible ways, they invariably have two common characteristics – they are always fought uphill and always at the junction of two or more map sheets.

General Sir William Slim
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Howard Mitchell

... for goodness' sake don't look up HMS Dasher...

Evil, Howard, just evil. That's akin to saying to someone who is desperately looking for the lou "make sure you don't think about waterfalls and dripping water hoses!" Doh! [:D]

Interesting story. Especially about the cover-up. With only the small amount of detail presented I'm left a bit curious about the possibility cited of an aircraft crashing into something explosive/flammable. Did CVE's actually land planes once in harbor?
mdiehl
Posts: 3969
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by mdiehl »

It was Mogami and Mikuma at Midway IIRC

There was also a collision before the one at Midway in the 1930s or 1940. And of course the Mogami-Nachi collision in 1944, although that one strikes me as Nachi's error. But collisions happened alot during WW2 and training exercises. I also recall a ship rammed Cowpens, and of course Washington rammed Indiana in another incident.

Wonder if anyone has ever made a comprehensive list?
Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?
User avatar
Howard Mitchell
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2002 11:41 am
Location: Blighty

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by Howard Mitchell »

ORIGINAL: witpqs
ORIGINAL: Howard Mitchell

... for goodness' sake don't look up HMS Dasher...

Evil, Howard, just evil. That's akin to saying to someone who is desperately looking for the lou "make sure you don't think about waterfalls and dripping water hoses!" Doh! [:D]

Interesting story. Especially about the cover-up. With only the small amount of detail presented I'm left a bit curious about the possibility cited of an aircraft crashing into something explosive/flammable. Did CVE's actually land planes once in harbor?

I don’t know if Dasher was under way at the time. The landing speed of a Swordfish was very low, so with even a bit of head-wind it may have been possible to do so at anchor, but as she is just said to be in the Firth of Clyde she was probably moving.

Norman Friedman’s excellent book British Carrier Aviation has a few paragraphs on the incident:

“The ship had just completed flying her aircraft, all but one having been struck down into her hangar, and two Swordfish were being fuelled. The carrier suddenly exploded with the audible ‘pouff’ characteristic of a petrol vapour explosion rather than a bomb or depth charge detonation. The explosion vented through the after bulkhead of the engine room low down, up through a large hatch just forward of the lift well, up and through the ship’s side to starboard via the FAA (Fleet Air Arm) messdeck, and presumably through the bottom in several places. All light and power failed immediately (the emergency diesel generator cut in, but failed after 20 seconds), the lift was blown into the air, the after end of the flight deck was visibly damaged, a violent fire started in the after end of the hangar, the engine room also began to burn, and the ship flooded rapidly from the starboard room bulkhead to the stern. She listed to starboard at about 10 degrees and then settled quickly by the stern, sinking in about 8 minutes. Only the captain and 148 out of a crew of 526 were saved.

The Board of Inquiry noted that there was a 1in diameter hole between the petrol stowage and the mainshaft tunnel, and that there were probably also several other openings below. Men had been working in the aft depth charge stowage, immediately abaft the petrol compartment, and it was thought that a man smoking in the shaft tunnel, or throwing a lit cigarette down from the FAA messdeck (and into the petrol control compartment below) had ignited the vapour. Another possibility was a spark from the hangar lighting system, which was not up to the magazine standards imposed on British fleet carriers”.

So a carelessly discarded cigarette may have blown the whole CVE apart.

While the battles the British fight may differ in the widest possible ways, they invariably have two common characteristics – they are always fought uphill and always at the junction of two or more map sheets.

General Sir William Slim
HMSWarspite
Posts: 1404
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 10:38 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by HMSWarspite »

ORIGINAL: pad152

Yes, there are a lot of random things in WITP but, randomly losing ships to non-combat events isn't one of them.

If the developers want to put in a real weather system with ships sailing into them getting sunk and combat ops get canceled that's fine but, I don't want to lose ships to a non-existent weather system, sunk by a random number!

Unless someone can answer the questions, how many times can this happen during a campaign? or how many times is one too many? This item shouldn't make the cut.

How is this different to a combat critical hit system? You get hit by one bomb, you lose the ship due to a critical. You randomly lose ships to a combat event...

Go with it. Anything that isn't explicitly modelled in the game can be simulated by random chance. You might debate the value of the chance but the principle is sound...
I have a cunning plan, My Lord
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by DuckofTindalos »

I'm sorry you're so upset about this, pad152, but it won't be taken out.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by witpqs »

Thanks Howard. The story is both interesting and pretty frightening.
User avatar
khyberbill
Posts: 1941
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: new milford, ct

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by khyberbill »

That just means that at some time in the game one of your CVs will be attacked by a giant 750' octopus and sunk.
Hmmm, do I get movie rights?
"Its a dog eat dog world Sammy and I am wearing Milkbone underwear" -Norm.
User avatar
khyberbill
Posts: 1941
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: new milford, ct

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by khyberbill »

Sub eating clams...hmmm, coming awful close to porn here. Any pics of this clam you speak of?
I think I met one of those when I was in the Silent Service. Her name was Big Fanny.
"Its a dog eat dog world Sammy and I am wearing Milkbone underwear" -Norm.
User avatar
rhohltjr
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: When I play pacific wargames, I expect smarter AI.

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by rhohltjr »

ORIGINAL: Dili

And beware of Godzilla!

No problem. I think Godzilla is an Allied Fan Boy.[:D]
[8D]
My e-troops don't unload OVER THE BEACH anymore, see:
Amphibious Assault at Kota Bharu
TF 85 troops securing a beachhead at Kota Bharu, 51,75
whew! I still feel better.
User avatar
Gunner98
Posts: 5975
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:49 am
Location: The Great White North!
Contact:

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by Gunner98 »

Not just explosions, navigational problems are big ship crunchers:

Point Honda 1923, 7 destroyers sunk.

http://www.pointhondamemorial.org/





Image
Attachments
7destroyers.gif
7destroyers.gif (70.67 KiB) Viewed 183 times
Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
bradfordkay
Posts: 8686
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: So, There I Was...

Post by bradfordkay »

I believe that they have stated that groundings will be among the "rare events" we might encounter.

My question is: how about tsunamis? USS Memphis comes to mind...


In reality I hope not, but the devil made me ask!
fair winds,
Brad
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”