ORIGINAL: Perturabo
It's not stupid. It's simply broken.
Then it is a good thing you didn't buy it.
-
ORIGINAL: Perturabo
It's not stupid. It's simply broken.
1. It is objective. I'm not talking about challenge here. It's a tactical game. AI in tactical games needs to be able to use tactics.ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd
Excuse me - isn't wether the AI is broken or not objective?
well CC5 gives me a kicking. I must be really bad
Just to get an idea of what lay ahead...I'm guessing that basically the player will have a fixed number of days (and nights?) to hold out in the Arnhem area before XXX Corps arrives?
Also I'm guessing that the 101st and 82nd sectors won't be included in the game?
It looks like the overall layout of the game will be similar to the campaign system in CC4/5?
ORIGINAL: Southern_land
Is there any game with a AI (Actual Intelligence) as opposed to hardcoded "doing stuff"?
ORIGINAL: Andrew Williams
Also I'm guessing that the 101st and 82nd sectors won't be included in the game?
Looking at this image I'm inclined to question your ability at guessing
ORIGINAL: Andrew Williams
What is that shield superimposed over the Union Jack? ... prbably just too small to readf...
To me it looks like this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Allied_Airborne_Army
ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd
I might not be thinking clearly - but the original game had all 3 sectors, didn't it?