Should I visit this forum any more ??

Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: The German-Soviet War 1941-1945 is a turn-based World War II strategy game stretching across the entire Eastern Front. Gamers can engage in an epic campaign, including division-sized battles with realistic and historical terrain, weather, orders of battle, logistics and combat results.

The critically and fan-acclaimed Eastern Front mega-game Gary Grigsby’s War in the East just got bigger and better with Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: Don to the Danube! This expansion to the award-winning War in the East comes with a wide array of later war scenarios ranging from short but intense 6 turn bouts like the Battle for Kharkov (1942) to immense 37-turn engagements taking place across multiple nations like Drama on the Danube (Summer 1944 – Spring 1945).

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21, elmo3

Adnan Meshuggi
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2001 8:00 am

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by Adnan Meshuggi »

ORIGINAL: Bletchley_Geek
ORIGINAL: DBeves
Yes - well this was exactly my opinion. Some people have posted about chess like machinations of 'types' of defence. ie these are based on gaming the game rather than it actually - as you say - reflecting what happened historically. Basically - the germans dug in and via hitlers no retreat order fought the russians to a stalemate. They did this without getting destroyed and in a position to launch a major offensive in the south. Basically - if the game cannot simulate this - and in fact - the same strategy leads to a german army virtually destroyed - then it is in fact broken as a simutlation of the eastern front. I am not interested in analyzing the engine to such an extent I eventually find a (ahistorical) way of surviving winter. I should be able to do what the germans did and come out of it in much the same way - or at least not with an army that is an empty shell.

This is the legacy of German memorists at work. Before claiming ahistoricity, you should perhaps spend some time reading history.

Like this very fine (yet old) article by Allen F. Chew, "Fighting Russians In Winter: Three Case Studies":

http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr= ... &q&f=false

Which google allows us to read for free.

Some extracts:
ORIGINAL: p.39
Because shelter was essential to survival, villages became the focal points of local battles during winter 1941-42, just as they had been in 1918-19. During the Soviet counteroffensive General Rendulic, commander of the 52nd Infantry Division, initially tried to conduct an orthodox defense which included holding open terrain. That, however, led to so many frostbite casualties that he had to restrict his lines to populated points and their immediate environs. When the Russians penetrated the gaps between German-held villages and fanned out laterally to threaten the roads leading to the rear of those villages, the Germans were forced to retreat again.

Sounds familiar?

There's however a point which it's unclear how it is accounted for:
ORIGINAL: p.40
Conducting defensive operations in open country around the turn of the year, 6 PzDiv was sustaining about 800 frostbite casualties a day. It had some five tons of explosives on hand, however, and on 3 January 1942 its engineers blasted enough craters to accomodate all of the combat elements. Covered with lumber and heated with open fires, each crater sheltered three to five men. New frostbite cases immediately fell from eight hundred to four a day. With minefields, antitank obstacles and paths trampled between and behind the craters, the position held out for ten days and was only abandoned when outflanked. Eventually, in order to free them from dependence on the engineers, the Germans trained both combat and service units to 100-gram cartridges for blasting shelters.

Blizzard penalties going down from January on, reflecting how the German Heer adapted to the circumstances, might account for this.

I could quote more passages, but I find terribly unfair to 2by3 developers statemens like the ones you - and many others - have been doing. WiTE is the most accurate depiction of Winter conditions I've ever seen. And that doesn't mean they got it completely right: they got it really really close to perfect!
You are right AND wrong.
right, the germans suffered, but wrong, they could hold in most places WITH the blizzard.

In the game they can´t hold, even if they are better supplied, better prepared, fortified and in better locations...
And this is wrong.
So if you speak about theblizzard, you need to agree, that the russians also lost partly 80% of their combat troops by frostbite. And here, they died.

So if the russian player need to loose all the men in summer 41, because this was historical true - and i can read you support only solutions that the russians need to loose exactly as historical, everything is fine :)

if not - well, that shows something.

In real life, the german troops could hold frontlines with a few troops in blizzard, cause the russians couldn´t fight either... they died in the open because most russian soldiers hat even less winter cloths... is this in the game?
Don't tickle yourself with some moralist crap thinking we have some sort of obligation to help these people. We're there for our self-interest, and anything we do to be 'nice' should be considered a courtesy dweebespit
Senno
Posts: 489
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:42 pm

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by Senno »

ORIGINAL: TulliusDetritus

Oleg, we could not see what you did on the other games where you faced the German "supermen". Now we can. Said this, from the screenshots of your German AAR opponent, I remember you had a linear defense in the Ukraine (west of Dnper), clear hexes aka tank country, and just in contact with the enemy (Panzers included) That was rather dangerous [8D]

Uhh, is this about our current game? Shhhh, put it where I can't see it, por favor.
Senno
Senno
Posts: 489
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:42 pm

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by Senno »

ORIGINAL: Oleg Mastruko

ORIGINAL: BigAnorak
Some Soviet players consider the current Axis army to consist of "supermen", while many testers feel the Axis is "not as good as it was before", so it may take some debate to finalise that side of the equation, before the first winter side of the equation is considered and applied.

Just a minor correction - they are supermen up to turn 17. Perhaps it's not really that bad, I still am not sure myself. If the "supermanism" of 41 is the only way for Axis to win the PBEM game, then let it be. However, I'd like to see more possibilities for Axis to win (42 offensive or slow defensive game till the very end)

Axis being too strong for too long, makes sudden drop from supermen to super-retards that occurs on first turn of blizz that much more painful and unrealistic.

Otherwise I agree with and support everything you said.

My "supermen" are like Charlie Sheen. High on "winning" one minute. Wondering where their kids (easy victories) went the next. Where or where did the magic go? (This is after your fortresses give off some unpredictable "Held" results, generally. Rather disappointing to have to do a "Monty" on fortresses....


Maybe it's just me though. Good thing I never said I was a good German player, haha.
Senno
User avatar
2ndACR
Posts: 5524
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 7:32 am
Location: Irving,Tx

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by 2ndACR »

Why on earth did you send that armor div to Riga? You should have shot him towards Pskov.[:-]

Nice AGC pocket there though. You might pay for missing the Lvov pocket. That is a bunch of good troops sown there.
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by Mynok »

I have read more than enough history on this war - but I make the assumption in posting that others have too. I certainly dont arrogantly suggest they havent as my opening gambit. For reference its whats called good manners.

It's also good sense to do as Bletchley suggested and cite the history supporting your points rather than demand we accept your claims a priori.
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
TulliusDetritus
Posts: 5581
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 1:49 am
Location: The Zone™

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by TulliusDetritus »

ORIGINAL: Senno
ORIGINAL: TulliusDetritus

Oleg, we could not see what you did on the other games where you faced the German "supermen". Now we can. Said this, from the screenshots of your German AAR opponent, I remember you had a linear defense in the Ukraine (west of Dnper), clear hexes aka tank country, and just in contact with the enemy (Panzers included) That was rather dangerous [8D]

Uhh, is this about our current game? Shhhh, put it where I can't see it, por favor.


No, of course not [:)] This was in another AAR, humm, vs 2ndACR (as Germans) perhaps?
"Hitler is a horrible sexual degenerate, a dangerous fool" - Mussolini, circa 1934
Senno
Posts: 489
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:42 pm

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by Senno »

ORIGINAL: TulliusDetritus

ORIGINAL: Senno
ORIGINAL: TulliusDetritus

Oleg, we could not see what you did on the other games where you faced the German "supermen". Now we can. Said this, from the screenshots of your German AAR opponent, I remember you had a linear defense in the Ukraine (west of Dnper), clear hexes aka tank country, and just in contact with the enemy (Panzers included) That was rather dangerous [8D]

Uhh, is this about our current game? Shhhh, put it where I can't see it, por favor.


No, of course not [:)] This was in another AAR, humm, vs 2ndACR (as Germans) perhaps?

OK great. Ahh, new avatar, cool.[:)]
ORIGINAL: 2ndACR

Why on earth did you send that armor div to Riga? You should have shot him towards Pskov.[:-]

Nice AGC pocket there though. You might pay for missing the Lvov pocket. That is a bunch of good troops sown there.

Yeah. What can I say? Told him I'd play both sides equally badly, he chose Soviets. I did want to do it myself rather than sit there with the opening moves threads open, hehe. C'est la vie. First PBEM, I didn't expect to be Guderian charging over the planes.
Senno
User avatar
2ndACR
Posts: 5524
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 7:32 am
Location: Irving,Tx

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by 2ndACR »

LOL, just messing with you. Oleg is good on the defense as Russian. Don't give him any breathing space. You really need to be at Pskov on turn 4 or sooner.

And a cherry at PBEM to boot. Brave man. LOL
Senno
Posts: 489
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:42 pm

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by Senno »

ORIGINAL: 2ndACR

LOL, just messing with you. Oleg is good on the defense as Russian. Don't give him any breathing space. You really need to be at Pskov on turn 4 or sooner.

And a cherry at PBEM to boot. Brave man. LOL

He kept saying my name when asking for someone to play him. The testers and I, anyway. And the testers and Oleg didn't agree on a game, sooo here we are, lol. I had been wanting to play, the opportunity just presented itself sooner, and with a better opponent than expected, haha.[:)] I need a Soviet neophyte so I can feel powerful.[:D] May not help even then, sigh.

I'm in vicinity of Pskov right now. Actually have been since turn 2 as I recall, just not "in force", waited on infantry (and MP's lawl), maybe to my detriment. I just sent him back turn 4. Since he is writing the AAR, I will leave the rest to him.[;)]

PS: "NO" Senno is very harsh and hurtful. Maybe just a "little" Senno, and see how it goes?[;)]

PPS: In truth there is no such thing as a "little" Senno.[;)]

PPPS: "Lesson" might be to be careful who you challenge, they might just accept.[;)]

OK, teasing overload in one post, sorry.
Senno
User avatar
Oleg Mastruko
Posts: 4534
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by Oleg Mastruko »

I didn't know it was your first PBEM Senno, really you were projecting an image of someone looking for trouble, trying to pick a fight LOL [;)]
Senno
Posts: 489
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:42 pm

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by Senno »

ORIGINAL: Oleg Mastruko

I didn't know it was your first PBEM Senno, really you were projecting an image of someone looking for trouble, trying to pick a fight LOL [;)]

Yep, first WITE PBEM. Been playing wargames forever, though. Solitaire when I couldn't find a good partner when young. This newfangled internet makes that a thing of the past, woot.[:)]
--
I was? I will have to chalk that up to the internet, as once you explained yourself I accepted your response, and your challenge. I wanted to clear up what you had said, basically. Maybe with a bit of hyperbole and to much sarcasm thrown in, I grant[:)]
ORIGINAL: Senno
ORIGINAL: Oleg Mastruko

ORIGINAL: Senno
Sorry, but that's what i see.[:)]

Only a fool won't change his mind when faced with some good arguments.

I agree with the reasonable you.

And I find BA's, ComradeP's findings along with the other testers believable and their arguments good. IE: Winter = survivable and no supermen. I suspect that since the math is hidden (how they arrive at final CV and odds) people will continue to call both sides supermen until it is revealed. And that might be a good thing, if only to quiet an ongoing source of controversy. I know many people like the hidden math, as they feel it gives them an advantage after they do the work and uncover the arcane formula.

At least until we have the results of current games. And games that are quit before resolution don't really count. So we are still waiting on BA and Speedy. Then fix away if they can demonstrate a problem.

And told you that I thought the testers would be a better challenge.

ORIGINAL: Senno

oleg, I suspect ComradeP would be a more fun game for you and a better test overall. But I shall play you (either side, your choice) if desired. I can commit to a turn a day.

And told you I wasn't very good, to boot, lol.

ORIGINAL: Senno
ORIGINAL: Oleg Mastruko


Senno how about you play German and try to survive the blizzard vs me? I don't know how good ("competent", Pieter would say) you are....

I'm not. But I shall do my best for posterity.

Or do you want to play germans and run over me? I'm equally bad, so your choice.

So the game continues. Which is good. I did accept the German side. And am doing my best to drive to the Urals.[:D]

Not that I agree that the game is broken yet. We still don't have the TOE's from any AAR's in spring '42 to look at.

It's all in Q-Ball's AAR, basically.[:'(] As far as fights go, kinda boring as TD noted, it was ad hominem free. I shall do better next time, TD. And try to be more popcorn worthy.[:D]

PS: My apology is in another thread, I forget where exactly....
Senno
User avatar
madgamer2
Posts: 1235
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 3:59 pm

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by madgamer2 »

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

Hi all,
ORIGINAL: DBeves

Well - I take this all on board.

Cant say anything even in this thread has made me feel better about the game as there seems to be a consensus even from different sides of the fence it is in fact broken - at least as far as the GC goes - which is in fact all I am interested in. The seeming lack of any official input into the argument doesnt augur well for it being fixed anytime soon either.

Still, had a couple of friends who were going to buy but I told them to hold off - at least I know I can tell them to wait a couple of years for the field marshal edition and keep them as friends![;)]

I will repeat what I wrote previously in one other similar thread - there is great 1942-1945 campaign if anyone feels / thinks that Barbarossa (i.e. 1st winter) rules are currently too adverse!

WitE is great fun to play and enjoy with plethora of scenarios (big and small)! [:)]


Leo "Apollo11"
Have you ever played a PBEM of the 42 start date? Have you ever WON as the German in that game? it is not the same
thing to me. Your Idea has merit but not for me. I bought this game because i want fight the whole East Front.

Madgamer2
If your not part of the solution
You are part of the problem
JWW
Posts: 1694
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Louisiana, USA

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by JWW »

Some off the wall thoughts on this thread.

First, while some of the criticism might turn some people from the game, I've been reading these threads closely and am more and more interested in the game. Won't be able to buy it for a while because I don't want my wife to eviscerate me, but I am now certain I will buy it. Might be Christmas sale, but I will get it.

Second, at first I thought Oleg was a jerk, but on further review, and after reading some other comments of his in other threads, I was wrong in my initial opinion. But I can see how someone just reading a few posts here could think otherwise.
E
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 am

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by E »

ORIGINAL: JW
I don't want my wife to eviscerate me
No guts, no glory!
"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
JWW
Posts: 1694
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Louisiana, USA

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by JWW »

If it just wasn't for all those Christmas sale games...........
Adnan Meshuggi
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2001 8:00 am

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by Adnan Meshuggi »

ORIGINAL: DBeves
ORIGINAL: Bletchley_Geek
ORIGINAL: DBeves
Mmmm.. yes I know my history thankyou very much ... however what you are doing is equating open terrain on the WITE map with the open terrain the article talks about ... even in a clear terrain hex on the WITE map there would have been hundreds not if not thousands of hamlets villages, etc ... I am well aware of the hedgehog nature of the german defence in winter 41 and the absolutely vital nature of housing in that defence. the point is the game doesnt take any of this into account ... A single dot on the WITE map - for which there is some limited benefit in game does not an argument make. The point is the effects on this scale are too severe - the effects of villages, hamlets etc are tactical and I think should be simulated at a more abstract level than in the game. I am struggling somewhat to see your point other than it reinforcing those who are arguing the effects are too severe - indeed your last point serves only to illustrate this in that there appears to be no benefit in being fortified in game as far as the first winter effects goes when your quote illustrates that in reality - even a simple dug out had a massive impact.

Sorry - but leaving your somewhat insulting critisism of my knowledge aside I really think you have entirely failed to make any kined of valid point that they have it anywhere near right - indeed - quite the contrary.

I didn't mean to insult anyone here.

I agree with you that protective properties of towns should be extended to neighboring hexes to better reflect WiTE scale and leaders Admin rating should have a role in the damage units take from blizzard. I also think that there's something missing - as a limiting factor - regarding logistics in the concept of offensive combat readiness (see my "over analyzing" posts regarding including Supply into the Ready/Unready equation).

You mention "simple entrechments". They weren't that simple, it seems, because if not I wonder why the units on the flanks of the 6. PzDiv didn't do the same thing. Obviously, it wasn't something common.

You know your history? You should cite it then, as I do.

My point is very clear: WiTE designers did their homework - just take a look at the Suggested Reading chapter on the manual - and put forward reasonable rules for simulating weather conditions. That these rules need balancing, yes, indeed. That's something already acknowledged by 2by3, as cookie monster has pointed out.

It took me half an hour to answer your post. You felt insulted and you took a mere five minutes on trying to portrait me as trolling you.

Perhaps should be better than you avoid these forums after all: the quality of the discussion would improve substantially.

Oh, and have a nice day.

Quite how you know how long it took me to answer you is beyond me. The quality of argument on these boards would improve substantially if people just made their points - without feeling the need to impune others knowledge as a preamble simply because they think they know more than others. If you look at your original post that is what you did. You could have made your point without suggesting "I read my History". Really - if thats what trolling is - then thats precisley what you did.

I have read more than enough history on this war - but I make the assumption in posting that others have too. I certainly dont arrogantly suggest they havent as my opening gambit. For reference its whats called good manners.

Hi, this is one problem in wargaming.
Some people belive they knew everything.

And they mostly forget that in a wargame, after turn1 everything is different.
The designer of a game should give us the chance to play a game like wite with fun and we can repeat history (average), be worse (if we overextend or make mistakes) or be better (if the enemy make mistakes or we are better prepared for a campagin)

Some people (mostly singleminded and if you do not agree to them they mutate to troll-mode) do not accept that their pov is not the ONLY one.

They want you to backup non-historical events (you never can do, cause if historically side a had done it... you know what i mean)

They do not want changes, cause THEIR opinion should be the truth. That the game (gc) is dead if the serious problems will not be solved (but not in a way that the other side has the same problem like the axis side in this game in the moment! (i think that is the real problem cause every switch is for the whole game!)) is ignored by them.
Don't tickle yourself with some moralist crap thinking we have some sort of obligation to help these people. We're there for our self-interest, and anything we do to be 'nice' should be considered a courtesy dweebespit
alfonso
Posts: 470
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Palma de Mallorca

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by alfonso »

To suggest that the historic result should be the average result is suggest that historically both sides made the same quantity of mistakes. This is very unlikely, in my opinion. If the German had a superior generalship (as it is usually assumed), in part due to the Soviet purges of 1937, should we not conclude that the Soviet "play" at the beginning of the war is more likely to be improved? Is not the Soviet player who can benefit more with the hindsight provided by the knowledge of what happened?

If a PacificWar game begins the day before Pearl Harbour, how many "Pearl Harbours" would be seen? If the game goes from 5 to 20 December 1941, the average result would be the Allied catastrophe it was?
User avatar
Apollo11
Posts: 25305
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by Apollo11 »

Hi all,
ORIGINAL: madgamer2
ORIGINAL: Apollo11
ORIGINAL: DBeves

Well - I take this all on board.

Cant say anything even in this thread has made me feel better about the game as there seems to be a consensus even from different sides of the fence it is in fact broken - at least as far as the GC goes - which is in fact all I am interested in. The seeming lack of any official input into the argument doesnt augur well for it being fixed anytime soon either.

Still, had a couple of friends who were going to buy but I told them to hold off - at least I know I can tell them to wait a couple of years for the field marshal edition and keep them as friends![;)]

I will repeat what I wrote previously in one other similar thread - there is great 1942-1945 campaign if anyone feels / thinks that Barbarossa (i.e. 1st winter) rules are currently too adverse!

WitE is great fun to play and enjoy with plethora of scenarios (big and small)! [:)]

Have you ever played a PBEM of the 42 start date? Have you ever WON as the German in that game? it is not the same
thing to me. Your Idea has merit but not for me. I bought this game because i want fight the whole East Front.

Madgamer2

Since I am WitE ALPHA/BETA I played quite a lot H2H games over the time (I simply didn't have much time for PBEMs - though I played at least 10+ of them during testing against Ester "NorthernStar" and Daniel "U2" mostly).

BTW, the H2H is great tool for testing (Andy "Sabre21" - most certainly our best player on both sides also played many H2H test games)!


But the main point here what is considered as "WON as the German"...

IMHO, similar to UV, WitP and WitP-AE, in WitE 95+ out of 100 PBEM games with similar players would always finish as Allied victories.

Why?

Because that is how it went historically - the Germans (and Japan) simply didn't have chance....

For me the German "victory" in WitE (same as Japanese victory in WitP / WitP-AE) would only be overall defeat but being better than history!

In other words when game ends in WitE I would consider victory if I would be able to hold Soviets 10 HEXes east of Berlin (although this is practical defeat)...


Leo "Apollo11"
Image

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE
Adnan Meshuggi
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2001 8:00 am

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by Adnan Meshuggi »

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

Hi all,

Because that is how it went historically - the Germans (and Japan) simply didn't have chance....

For me the German "victory" in WitE (same as Japanese victory in WitP / WitP-AE) would only be overall defeat but being better than history!

In other words when game ends in WitE I would consider victory if I would be able to hold Soviets 10 HEXes east of Berlin (although this is practical defeat)...


Leo "Apollo11"

Hi,

here we have one statement - that cause big problems for me.
Why?
Cause the russian rush to berlin isn´t as clear as it seems.
If the only chance for german side is to reach such a result (and i doubt that even this could be possible in the moment, cause the mechanismen prefer "overhelming attacks") you describe, there is no fun for playing both sides in a gc. (nothing against some interesting scenarios)

The winterproblem suits perfect and is no problem but wad.
At last with your comment about the war.

Could you explain why a competent german player never could have the chance of deliver much better results? (i do not say "crushing victories in 43 oder 44, just a better situation with a frontline in russia?

the russians bled white in their offensive operations, that is a historical fact. And that is with all the mistakes the germans (not only hitler) did after Kursk.

I can´t see a lot mistakes by the russians after kursk (beside beeing to generous with the loss of life of the own troops)

I really like to read some points that explain such opinion like yours. (no pun intend)

japan in witp? yes, you are right. after midway even the brits had beaten the japanese alone (with support of australia, canada and new zealand), but in the eastern front?
Everything i learned about ww2-eastern front tells something different. And we talk about gc, not a game starting right after kursk (here i agree completly)

Greetings
Don't tickle yourself with some moralist crap thinking we have some sort of obligation to help these people. We're there for our self-interest, and anything we do to be 'nice' should be considered a courtesy dweebespit
alfonso
Posts: 470
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Palma de Mallorca

RE: Should I visit this forum any more ??

Post by alfonso »

ORIGINAL: Adnan Meshuggi

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

Hi all,

Because that is how it went historically - the Germans (and Japan) simply didn't have chance....

For me the German "victory" in WitE (same as Japanese victory in WitP / WitP-AE) would only be overall defeat but being better than history!

In other words when game ends in WitE I would consider victory if I would be able to hold Soviets 10 HEXes east of Berlin (although this is practical defeat)...


Leo "Apollo11"

Hi,

here we have one statement - that cause big problems for me.
Why?
Cause the russian rush to berlin isn´t as clear as it seems.
If the only chance for german side is to reach such a result (and i doubt that even this could be possible in the moment, cause the mechanismen prefer "overhelming attacks") you describe, there is no fun for playing both sides in a gc. (nothing against some interesting scenarios)

The winterproblem suits perfect and is no problem but wad.
At last with your comment about the war.

Could you explain why a competent german player never could have the chance of deliver much better results? (i do not say "crushing victories in 43 oder 44, just a better situation with a frontline in russia?

the russians bled white in their offensive operations, that is a historical fact. And that is with all the mistakes the germans (not only hitler) did after Kursk.

I can´t see a lot mistakes by the russians after kursk (beside beeing to generous with the loss of life of the own troops)

I really like to read some points that explain such opinion like yours. (no pun intend)

japan in witp? yes, you are right. after midway even the brits had beaten the japanese alone (with support of australia, canada and new zealand), but in the eastern front?
Everything i learned about ww2-eastern front tells something different. And we talk about gc, not a game starting right after kursk (here i agree completly)

Greetings

Yes, I agree, if the Germans do better in 1943 than historically, they should arrive in better shape to 1944. And if they perform better again in 1944, they could be in a decent shape when Summer 1945 arrives. (And then, they surrender after the American atomic bombs over Kassel and Wuppertal). It would be interesting, for instance, what would have happened if the Kursk offensive is cancelled.

That said, and applying the same correct logic, if the Soviet do better during 1941-42 (not unlikely, in my opinion), then...it would very difficult to arrive at Case Blue.

EDIT: in addition, I don't understand why fighting around Kursk in 1945 is funnier than fighting around Berlin in 1945.

Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series”