ORIGINAL: Symon
English is my second language. Think I have mastered it sufficiently to express myself cogently.ORIGINAL: geofflambert
Simple Symon met a pieman, but never mastered english.
Iron is not armor. Iron is a structural material with well established moduli, like wood. Iron has certain structural benefits over wood, assuming the technology is available to produce iron in the requisite form and thickness. Iron is useful in resisting wracking stresses, and when combined with Seppings trusses, useful in reducing hogging moments in long vessels. Its usefulness against round shot was a highly desirable, but almost secondary consideration.
The only time I used the term armor was with Warrior's outer iron sheathing, because that was it's function. It was not a structural member. The rest of the time, I used the term iron.
Don't know why I even bother engaging pre-teens. You have your wiki-world, where reality is worse than a bath and some deodorant. Gotta say I try to feel for ya, but just can't reach that far. Ciao. J
A pre-teen? I wish. So where are you from really? Not De Eye-lands, Mon. The Czechs and the northern Italians are known for their metallurgy, would you be one of those?
For the record, just how old are you in gorn years?










