Ace (CSA) vs Aurelian (US)

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

Late Oct - turn 14

Post by Ace1_slith »

Late Oct - turn 14

No big battles this turn, I'll post few smaller ones:
Foote was without ammo and was getting a beating. The problem is I was getting without ammo too. Ships consume a lot of ammo, more than a tooltip tels you. I was not able to catch his land units traveling via river. They simply imediatly disembarked to closest region. I do not know if that is possible any more.

Image
Attachments
2013-11-28_060621.jpg
2013-11-28_060621.jpg (150.13 KiB) Viewed 549 times
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

RE: Late Oct - turn 14

Post by Ace1_slith »

Van dorn was doing a quick work on his Pensacola stack, earning a promotion in the process:


Image
Attachments
20131128_060353.jpg
20131128_060353.jpg (207.55 KiB) Viewed 549 times
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

RE: Late Oct - turn 14

Post by Ace1_slith »

He attempted another futile battle at Pittsburg. Even with divisions he suffered command penalties. Detached divisions need 2 generals for optimal command.

Image
Attachments
20131128_060808.jpg
20131128_060808.jpg (131.64 KiB) Viewed 549 times
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

RE: Late Oct - turn 14

Post by Ace1_slith »

Plans for the Eastern theater:


Image
Attachments
2013-11-28_061609.jpg
2013-11-28_061609.jpg (531.26 KiB) Viewed 549 times
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

RE: Late Oct - turn 14

Post by Ace1_slith »

Eastern theater:


Image
Attachments
20131128_062320.jpg
20131128_062320.jpg (483.49 KiB) Viewed 549 times
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

Early Nov - turn 15

Post by Ace1_slith »

Early Nov - turn 15


Image
Attachments
20131128_064529.jpg
20131128_064529.jpg (211.52 KiB) Viewed 549 times
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

RE: Early Nov - turn 15

Post by Ace1_slith »

The raiding does not make sence if you get caught, and having wagons gets you caught easily.


Image
Attachments
20131128_064546.jpg
20131128_064546.jpg (143.85 KiB) Viewed 549 times
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

RE: Early Nov - turn 15

Post by Ace1_slith »

He tried to position himself in between York and Frederickstown, not a smart move with only 1 division. With McDowell's 5 division besieged, he can muster about 4-5 divisions in the Wash-Philly area. Sending away his divisions on such futile missions reminds of the movie Downfall in which Hitler rants about Steiner assault. Sapping his strength in needless assaults is not the way to go.

Image
Attachments
20131128_064616.jpg
20131128_064616.jpg (176.1 KiB) Viewed 549 times
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

RE: Early Nov - turn 15

Post by Ace1_slith »

Another icture to demonstrate irregulars effectivness in the mountains.
I had 2 stacks in the area. Only one stack fought, about 600 Texan rangers. They ambushed his regulars and volunteers as they were moving to retake Golden city.


Image
Attachments
20131128_064645.jpg
20131128_064645.jpg (179.59 KiB) Viewed 549 times
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

RE: Early Nov - turn 15

Post by Ace1_slith »

Plans for the next turn and rundown of the strengths in the area.
I have:
Beauregard:
4 divisions
Bragg:
1 division
Longstreet:
2 divisions

He has:
McDowell:
4 division - currently less than 2 divisions fighting power since he cannot receive reinforcement
Hooker:
1,5 division
Washington garrsion:
1,5 division
Shields:
1 division

In WV, he has 2 divisions opposite to my 1 division.

So, US has 2 divisions more in the theater, they are just very very badly placed, with McDowel being besieged a loss from which it cannot be recovered from.

I do have better divisions, no militias at all. It gives me faster movement and more operational freedom.

Image
Attachments
20131128_065027.jpg
20131128_065027.jpg (526.67 KiB) Viewed 549 times
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

RE: Early Nov - turn 15

Post by Ace1_slith »

In the West he has mustered 3 divisions under Grant. Opposite to him is entrenched Polk with 1,5 division. I do have a lot of captured guns which will come in handy in defense. I have instructed Polk to retreat inside city if beaten. I always have another army led by Johnston in front of StLouis to lift the potential siege of Cairo if the battle goes bad.

Up to now, he has lost 42000 men to my 21000 men. That makes up 3 divisions of men he could have put to good use if he had not squandered them away in numerous assaults.

Image
Attachments
20131128_065203.jpg
20131128_065203.jpg (190.52 KiB) Viewed 548 times
Aurelian
Posts: 4073
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm

RE: Early Nov - turn 15

Post by Aurelian »

Yeah, well, when you have only one or two decent leaders, and you're trying to keep the hordes from pouring north, and at the same time having to head toward Richmond or take a 10 NM hit, (in 1861 and 1862), it gets a bit difficult :)
 
Now if the invasion had a foreign entry penalty, or a bigger attrition hit, (a great many of Lee's soldiers would not cross in to Maryland. And Davis was concerned about the negative effect an invasion would have on Europe. "All we ask is to let alone.")
 
Ahh well.... Someone may hit upon a counter. I haven't.
Building a new PC.
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

RE: Early Nov - turn 15

Post by Ace1_slith »

The on to Richmond event unnerves players. You have to forget about it. It gives -10 NM while some other Union events give you piece by piece +10 NM. You will never fulfill its requirements in PBEM. Trying to fulfill it will only make it worse. The Europe was interested in short war, they were not interested who is aggressor and who is not, they were looking their own interest. This was not 21st century. If you look how Britain behaved, they were supporting South while it looked they would win their Independence. After Antietam and definitely after Gettysburg, when they concluded Union will definitely win the war, they quickly turned sides, seizing CSA ships which were under construction in UK ports.

Think about it, US was wery cautious to guard its Northern cities. Much of numerical advantage in troops spoken of in previous mails were on guard duty against raider incursions to the North. If we impose penalties for CSA attacking similar to penalties for breaking Kentucky neutrality, US player will have all the freedom in the world to remove his forces from border states and send them to coastal invasions. Did such possibility exist for US. Not until 62.

In AACW1, playing as Union in PBEM, I would take Richmond by October, and invade NO by November. Such power imbalance is not present any more. Union can only defend in 61. Overall, CSA could use little more militias instead of regulars in starting forces. 61 offenses were not a big possibility for either side. Militias composition of forces will do that.
I would wait for the next patch before making a judgment if the Federals need help. Increase WS cost will hurt CSA a lot.

P.S.
And Aurelian, please do not take offense if I criticize some of your moves. I mean no harm, I just want everyone to learn on the mistakes and become better players.
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

Early Dec - turn 17

Post by Ace1_slith »

Early Dec - turn 17

I lost Late Nov files, so I 'll be skipping to Dec. Nothing important happened in lost turn. Aurelian said he instructed Grant to march to Polk, but he failed to do so, I do not know why. This time he ordered him again and the battle happened. In the meantime, I reinforced Polk with some cav brigades, so he had 2 entrenched divisions against 3 assaulting ones.

Image

Grant took more casualties because I had captured enormous amount of Union guns at Cairo. I had 160 cannon lined up in open terrain against him. The game declared Union victor, yet noone retreated from the field. I looked up into battlelog.txt file generated by the game. It seems Grant decided to stop the assault after suffering more than 20% casualties. But being still stronger he did not want to leave the area. So noone retreating is ok. But if he decided to stop with the assault, the game should not declare that he won the battle, it is confusing.

One more note on Union compostition, besides 3 divisions he has a volunteer brigade and a cannon regiment with no supply wagon. Those two drag his command penalties up to 20%. The CP aply to entire force, so in fact he would be better off without those two units than with them. Effect of 20% CP is the same as Grant having 2 attack rating instead of 6.
Attachments
20131128_100343.jpg
20131128_100343.jpg (258.58 KiB) Viewed 548 times
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

RE: Early Dec - turn 17

Post by Ace1_slith »

With winter closing in, I had the last chance to storm StLouis. My ammo was low as well, as I had just enough for 2 battles.


Image
Attachments
20131128_100147.jpg
20131128_100147.jpg (274.75 KiB) Viewed 548 times
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

RE: Early Dec - turn 17

Post by Ace1_slith »

Hooker division sailed from Philly and landed to Norfolk. I saw ships in Philly last turn, but I did not think he would detach a division for amphibious operations while Washington is threatened. There is a tooltip glich in the battle report window. For my forces it said they suffered from amphibious penalties, while it should say they caught enemy forces on the beach.


Image
Attachments
20131128_100417.jpg
20131128_100417.jpg (183.16 KiB) Viewed 548 times
veji1
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 5:28 pm

RE: Early Oct - turn 13

Post by veji1 »

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

ORIGINAL: Ace1

I am not sure Union had 2:1 advantage so early in the war. At the battle of Pea ridge it was the other way around, 1,5:1 in favor of CSA. In 61, CSA had manpower advantage in the West and almost on equal terms in the East. Later, US got to 2,5:1 advantage in men, but closer to 2:1 if we count front line troops with garrisons keeping peace at home and in occupied areas.
There is no big battle in which US had more than 2:1 advantage almost all the way to 1865. At Chancellorsville there the biggest disparity in numbers up to '65, and it was 2:1, and only because Lee had detached Longstreet due to supply problems.

Since CSA historically failed to capitalize on it, people do forget how close the war was in the first year. Only later, it turned into one way alley.

Jim posted a strength chart, and I will find and post later one that takes out men who are AWOL, but it doesn't change the overall ratio.

The South did outnumber the Union at Pea Ridge, but that was the only major battle of the Civil War where that happened.

In the remainder of the Western Theater, the Confederates outnumbered in early 1862. AS Johnston struggled to establish a viable line with Polk's forces, Ft Henry/Donelson, and his own 18,000 or so at Bowling Green.

In the east, the Union had nearly 200,000 troops in Virginia by March of 1862. The Confederacy was able to even-up the odds by tying down large formations in the Valley, Northern VA, Norfolk, and other places to guard against Confederate offensives.

The Union did have to allocate large detachments to guard supply lines and on coast expeditions, so getting 2-1 on the field at all points never did happen, that's true. Southern numbers likely do not include certain state troops, militia, and partisans. 2-1 should not be an in-game objective anyway, because the Union player can play more aggressively than real life one.

But the Confederacy overall, at no point, had anything approaching parity in numbers in the field with the Union. The numbers just don't bear that out.

I tend to agree with Qball here, as well as with what Michael T said : There is a rebalancing need, with the Union having significantly more men, maybe mainly militia.

If you give the Union 50 000 extra militia (ie 100/120 regs in general) say in 2 events in august 61 and february 62, then they can use those troops to garrison their cities (add an arty and some militia can stop a coup de main). The fact that they are only somewhat efficient on their own states also makes that more realistic : If you have quite a bit of pennsylvania militia protecting Pittsburgh, it becomes a tougher nut to crack. Same for Cincinnati, Cairo, etc...

I think that could really be a simple yet quite efficient solution. It is worth trying and probably easily modded. It allows the Union to build more quality troops for the actual "bringing the war to the south" but gives it lots more soldiers to protect its rear, dig entrenchments, garrison, protect railways, etc...
Adieu Ô Dieu odieux... signé Adam
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

RE: Early Dec - turn 17

Post by Ace1_slith »

Plans for the next turn:


Image
Attachments
20131128_100615.jpg
20131128_100615.jpg (186.18 KiB) Viewed 548 times
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

RE: Early Dec - turn 17

Post by Ace1_slith »

West theater. Johnson did it just bearly, only 6% ammo left.


Image
Attachments
20131128_100707.jpg
20131128_100707.jpg (411.18 KiB) Viewed 548 times
Ace1_slith
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:45 pm

Late Dec 61

Post by Ace1_slith »

Late Dec 61

Battle of York was a success:


Image
Attachments
20131128_163048.jpg
20131128_163048.jpg (217.84 KiB) Viewed 548 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”