The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Moderator: Joel Billings
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
What we're also seeing is the south not getting completely abandoned, but instead getting defended by a token force only. Curious to see what the impact of that will be. I suspect no detrimental effects for the Soviets.
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
ORIGINAL: Jango32
What we're also seeing is the south not getting completely abandoned, but instead getting defended by a token force only. Curious to see what the impact of that will be. I suspect no detrimental effects for the Soviets.
Yes I suppose to be more exact the strategy is leaving a mobile force of cavalry and other such relatively useless defensive units to guard the rivers.
I still consider it abandoning the south, but one could argue otherwise!
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Turn 6 start. Odessa falls to 140,000 Germans. More grinding at Leningrad.


- Attachments
-
- 993.jpg (291.46 KiB) Viewed 424 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
I've sung already what Stamb said above in other threads.
In the game where I play Soviet I am fighting in the south too but I do agree presently the gimmick is to retreat and keep the Germans on their logistic limits.
In the game where I play Soviet I am fighting in the south too but I do agree presently the gimmick is to retreat and keep the Germans on their logistic limits.
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
These ratios make me hearken back to the good old days before AFV changes, where I'd have lost half of this. Alas.
Instead we settle for a 3-1 ratio.

Instead we settle for a 3-1 ratio.

- Attachments
-
- 994.jpg (148.75 KiB) Viewed 424 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Rokossovosky's 16th army hits hard. I didn't notice the level 1 fort, could have very well been a fail!


- Attachments
-
- 995.jpg (142.21 KiB) Viewed 424 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Our new tank army is formed at Kharkov. Commander still needs to be replaced, of course, but ideally these boys won't see combat until CPP is up.


- Attachments
-
- 996.jpg (150.95 KiB) Viewed 424 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Post moves. Central front, newly arrived this turn, will be designated as my 2nd assault next turn.


- Attachments
-
- 997.jpg (395.11 KiB) Viewed 424 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
OOB Turn 6.


- Attachments
-
- 998.jpg (122.02 KiB) Viewed 424 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
New house rule incoming "no transfer of entire south armies to the reserve" 

Слава Україні!
Glory to Ukraine!
Glory to Ukraine!
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
When do the Tank divs start disbanding into brigades?
Molotov : This we did not deserve.
Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.
C'est la guerre aérienne
Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.
C'est la guerre aérienne
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
ORIGINAL: 56ajax
When do the Tank divs start disbanding into brigades?
I believe there's a 20 or 30% chance for them to reform into brigades if they're routed, and I think every tank is converted turn 32 or something.
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Turn 7 start. I did move my cavalry around though, to encircle some Germans and to move out of a potential pocket - insofar as I could of course.
Slow grinding at Leningrad, no attacks towards Moscow, but some pushing north of Gomel. Gomel itself also fell.

Slow grinding at Leningrad, no attacks towards Moscow, but some pushing north of Gomel. Gomel itself also fell.

- Attachments
-
- 1000.jpg (338.09 KiB) Viewed 426 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Turn end. Pretty much the only movement was north of Gomel, and the cavalry in the south. I've deployed more useless troops - such as NKVD units brought in from TBs - to the south also.
I should also mention since I forgot to last time, Rostov was given 8 rifle divisions as reinforcements last turn in order to build up it as a city fort. I probably won't keep them all there, but Rostov is certainly a worthwhile investment as for whatever reason it's CVs seem to balloon.

I should also mention since I forgot to last time, Rostov was given 8 rifle divisions as reinforcements last turn in order to build up it as a city fort. I probably won't keep them all there, but Rostov is certainly a worthwhile investment as for whatever reason it's CVs seem to balloon.

- Attachments
-
- 1002.jpg (283.91 KiB) Viewed 426 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
A mighty 600 CV, despite most of it's divisions being 50-70% TOE.


- Attachments
-
- 1003.jpg (75.48 KiB) Viewed 426 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
OOB turn 7. Central front is made an assault HQ - dunno if I mentioned that.


- Attachments
-
- 1004.jpg (113.02 KiB) Viewed 426 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
A setback, I've managed to let me cavalry get encircled. I was hoping to save the ones from the potential pocket, but may have doomed the entire army instead!
We've called BOBKIN to save us.

We've called BOBKIN to save us.

- Attachments
-
- 1005.jpg (321.43 KiB) Viewed 427 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Bobkin saves the day... For now. Our brave cavalry have also decided of their own accord to march in and cut off the enemies armored forces.


- Attachments
-
- 1006.jpg (137.54 KiB) Viewed 426 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
1


- Attachments
-
- 1007.jpg (143.9 KiB) Viewed 426 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
2


- Attachments
-
- 1008.jpg (143.53 KiB) Viewed 426 times