Shock??

Post advice on tactics and strategies here; share your experience on how to become a better wargamer.

Moderators: ralphtricky, JAMiAM

Post Reply
User avatar
B/snafu
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: North Carolina

Shock??

Post by B/snafu »

Iv'e read AAR's where they talk about this side's shock or so will rule until turn so and so before it goes down, etc. Iv'e looked through the manual a few times and have seen references to it in %'s and such.

Can anyone explain it too me in simple terms what exaxtly it does and how powerful it can be (all encompassing or just a small part) when deciding too make a move or attack?? Or at least point me to a thread or link that already covers it?


Any help would be appreciated.
"How can you buy eggs in Malta for seven cents apiece and sell them at a profit in Pianosa for five cents?? "
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

RE: Shock??

Post by golden delicious »

I'm not sure what the exact systems are at the level of individual items of equipment, but effectively shock is a simple multiplier of unit strength, in much the same way as unit quality (unit quality = (2 * proficiency + supply + readiness)/4).

In addition- and perhaps more importantly- the shock level is the % chance that a formation will be available for orders on any given turn. 100% and above shock has no effect on the game in this regard but a force with, for example, 80% shock will see on average one in five of its formations randomly unavailable for orders each turn. These units cannot move or attack, but they can still be ordered to dig in, set to reserve, change loss tolerance or disband.
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
User avatar
rhinobones
Posts: 2160
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Shock??

Post by rhinobones »

ORIGINAL:I'm not sure what the exact systems are at the level of individual items of equipment, but effectively shock is a simple multiplier of unit strength, in much the same way as unit quality (unit quality = (2 * proficiency + supply + readiness)/4).

What impact does positive shock have on combat rounds? I’ve seen people mention that they typically get more rounds of combat when positive shock is in effect. Is this because unit proficiency is enhanced by positive shock?

Regards, RhinoBones
Colin Wright:
Pre Combat Air Strikes # 64 . . . I need have no concern about keeping it civil

Post by broccolini » Sun Nov 06, 2022
. . . no-one needs apologize for douchebags acting like douchebags
JAMiAM
Posts: 6127
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:35 am

RE: Shock??

Post by JAMiAM »

ORIGINAL: rhinobones

ORIGINAL:I'm not sure what the exact systems are at the level of individual items of equipment, but effectively shock is a simple multiplier of unit strength, in much the same way as unit quality (unit quality = (2 * proficiency + supply + readiness)/4).

What impact does positive shock have on combat rounds? I’ve seen people mention that they typically get more rounds of combat when positive shock is in effect. Is this because unit proficiency is enhanced by positive shock?

Regards, RhinoBones
It forces a countback of the tactical rounds expended in combat. Ralph could verify the exact formula, but I believe it is one round counted back, for each increment of 10% shock, rounded up.
User avatar
B/snafu
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: North Carolina

RE: Shock??

Post by B/snafu »

ORIGINAL: JAMiAM

ORIGINAL: rhinobones

ORIGINAL:I'm not sure what the exact systems are at the level of individual items of equipment, but effectively shock is a simple multiplier of unit strength, in much the same way as unit quality (unit quality = (2 * proficiency + supply + readiness)/4).

What impact does positive shock have on combat rounds? I’ve seen people mention that they typically get more rounds of combat when positive shock is in effect. Is this because unit proficiency is enhanced by positive shock?

Regards, RhinoBones
It forces a countback of the tactical rounds expended in combat. Ralph could verify the exact formula, but I believe it is one round counted back, for each increment of 10% shock, rounded up.

I've finally actually have experianced multiple combat rounds. Playing silvanski's modded russian war 1941 scenario-I believe it's due to the shock on the first few turns (or could be my ever increasing superior skill[8|])--but was able to have 5 "resolve all combats" with high number of units involved across the map and 2 "resolve all combats" involving air attacks in one turn. Finally, more than two rounds in a turn.
"How can you buy eggs in Malta for seven cents apiece and sell them at a profit in Pianosa for five cents?? "
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 14658
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

RE: Shock??

Post by Curtis Lemay »

ORIGINAL: JAMiAM
It forces a countback of the tactical rounds expended in combat. Ralph could verify the exact formula, but I believe it is one round counted back, for each increment of 10% shock, rounded up.

I'm not convinced there was ever any effect at all. What players were seeing was probably entirely due to the bug with saved turns. Now that that has been fixed, Bigfoot sightings of extra rounds will fade into legend.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
Veers
Posts: 1324
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 6:04 am

RE: Shock??

Post by Veers »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: JAMiAM
It forces a countback of the tactical rounds expended in combat. Ralph could verify the exact formula, but I believe it is one round counted back, for each increment of 10% shock, rounded up.

I'm not convinced there was ever any effect at all. What players were seeing was probably entirely due to the bug with saved turns. Now that that has been fixed, Bigfoot sightings of extra rounds will fade into legend.

Definately still has the coutnback feature. I have, more than once with T3, seen a combat go several rounds only to have my turn used be less than the number of rounds I saw in the combats.
To repeat history in a game is to be predictable.
If you wish to learn more about EA, feel free to pop over to the EA forums Europe Aflame Forums.
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

RE: Shock??

Post by golden delicious »

ORIGINAL: Veers

Definately still has the coutnback feature. I have, more than once with T3, seen a combat go several rounds only to have my turn used be less than the number of rounds I saw in the combats.

Agree. With positive shock, it seems nearly impossible to suffer from "turn burn", even when you have "attack continues" occuring several times.
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
Jonny
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 4:28 pm

RE: Shock??

Post by Jonny »

Is higher shock better or lower shock better?  It sounds like lower is better.
Jonathan R. Rono
User avatar
L`zard
Posts: 362
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 6:12 am
Location: Oregon, USA

RE: Shock??

Post by L`zard »

@Jonny;

Rather depends on whether the shock is in favor of 'YOUR' side, eh?

Shock values can be 90% for you (bad) or 130# for you (good).

View-point is everything, LOL!
"I have the brain of a genius, and the heart of a little child! I keep them in a jar under my bed."

ColinWright
Posts: 2604
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 6:28 pm

RE: Shock??

Post by ColinWright »

ORIGINAL: golden delicious
ORIGINAL: Veers

Definately still has the coutnback feature. I have, more than once with T3, seen a combat go several rounds only to have my turn used be less than the number of rounds I saw in the combats.

Agree. With positive shock, it seems nearly impossible to suffer from "turn burn", even when you have "attack continues" occuring several times.

Yeah. The impact of giving one side 90% shock while leaving the other at 100% is far less than that of leaving one side at 100% while giving the other 110%.
I am not Charlie Hebdo
Jonny
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 4:28 pm

RE: Shock??

Post by Jonny »

@ L'zard-Indeed.
Jonathan R. Rono
User avatar
Silvanski
Posts: 2511
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:16 pm
Location: Belgium, residing in TX-USA

RE: Shock??

Post by Silvanski »

Below 100% there's an increased risk of formations being forced into reorganization
The TOAW Redux Dude
User avatar
L`zard
Posts: 362
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 6:12 am
Location: Oregon, USA

RE: Shock??

Post by L`zard »

ORIGINAL: Silvanski

Below 100% there's an increased risk of formations being forced into reorganization

READ: winter is NOT your friend, LOL!
"I have the brain of a genius, and the heart of a little child! I keep them in a jar under my bed."

Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”