Weapon Breakdowns
Moderator: MOD_SPWaW
Weapon Breakdowns
Does anyone know just how the game engine handles weapon breakdowns? Supposedly there's a chance they can be "fixed" during a turn, but I don't think I've ever seen that actually happen yet. I find it hard to believe a unit could have a weapon break so completely as to put it out of commission for more than a two turns. Gun crews are drilled over and over again on how to clear jams and get the weapon back "up" until they can do it in their sleep. (I know, that was one of my duties, training gun crews, back in my Navy days)
Sure, you get a "dud" round every now and then, but 99.9% of the time you clear the round and you're ready to rock and roll again in a few seconds. So when, in the game, I see a Tiger lose it's 88, not for just a turn or two, but for the whole scenario, I have to wonder about it. And let's not even get on the subject of a 10 man squad suddenly having all its rifles jam at the same time...and stay jammed. I know it's because the game engine can't deal with a single weapon in a squad jamming, so when it happens it happens to the whole squad, but how about making it a quick repair, taking no more than a single turn?
Sure, you get a "dud" round every now and then, but 99.9% of the time you clear the round and you're ready to rock and roll again in a few seconds. So when, in the game, I see a Tiger lose it's 88, not for just a turn or two, but for the whole scenario, I have to wonder about it. And let's not even get on the subject of a 10 man squad suddenly having all its rifles jam at the same time...and stay jammed. I know it's because the game engine can't deal with a single weapon in a squad jamming, so when it happens it happens to the whole squad, but how about making it a quick repair, taking no more than a single turn?
What, me worry?
- Fallschirmjager
- Posts: 3555
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
- Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Im no weapons expert but I can think of several ways for a gun to become damaged.
In response to your first question I have had a weapon stop firing and then have it repaired. This morning I had a MG-42 stop firing then 4 turns later it was repaired.
As far as large weapons go some of the possible things I can think of would be the simple things like jams, duds, overheating, premature explosions while still in the barrel (Ive read about that alot in the Civil war and a few times in WW2), the breach hatch becoming jammed and early M4s and Shermans due to poor craftmanship with prolonged firing had the rifling in their barrels worn away.
A a turn is between 2-5 minutes so a 15 turn scenario is maybe 30 min to an hour and a half so I can see losing a gun for that long. Plus we are dealing weaponary that is 60 years old and just think of the leaps in weaponary between the Spanish Civil war (45mm guns were the norm) and 1942 (88mm were installed on tanks) they probally shoved them out in the field as fast as possible and reliability be damned (look at the Panther).
One odd thing I have noticed is today I had a Sherman take an Rpg right in the side and become immobilized and lo and behold 7 turns later I get a message saying its been repaired. Unless they got out in the middle of battle and fixed the tracks or repaired the engine then I dont see how they got in running again.
In response to your first question I have had a weapon stop firing and then have it repaired. This morning I had a MG-42 stop firing then 4 turns later it was repaired.
As far as large weapons go some of the possible things I can think of would be the simple things like jams, duds, overheating, premature explosions while still in the barrel (Ive read about that alot in the Civil war and a few times in WW2), the breach hatch becoming jammed and early M4s and Shermans due to poor craftmanship with prolonged firing had the rifling in their barrels worn away.
A a turn is between 2-5 minutes so a 15 turn scenario is maybe 30 min to an hour and a half so I can see losing a gun for that long. Plus we are dealing weaponary that is 60 years old and just think of the leaps in weaponary between the Spanish Civil war (45mm guns were the norm) and 1942 (88mm were installed on tanks) they probally shoved them out in the field as fast as possible and reliability be damned (look at the Panther).
One odd thing I have noticed is today I had a Sherman take an Rpg right in the side and become immobilized and lo and behold 7 turns later I get a message saying its been repaired. Unless they got out in the middle of battle and fixed the tracks or repaired the engine then I dont see how they got in running again.
Repairs depend alot on the experience of the crew. The amount of damage also affects how long they could take (check the 'damage' value on the unit info screen). I had a Panther take an immobilizing side hit from a Jackson (damage=3), and was surprised when it completed repairs 5-6 turns later...and it had its full speed 

- Fallschirmjager
- Posts: 3555
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
- Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
If the vehicle is suppressed enough, the game engine won't even attempt checking on the status of repairs.Originally posted by Fallschirmjager
I was thinking the same thing, If a crew gets out and inspects the damage and begins repaires while bullets shells and mortars are hitting all around then medals all the way around.
Okay, I'll grant the possibility of main guns breaking down for the duration of a scenario due to poor design and/or maintenance, but surely all the breakdowns aren't from those causes. When I used to train Navy 3" crews our goal for clearing a misfire was 45 seconds, and we frequently managed it in under 35. So, a jammed or dud round should still be able to be cleared by the following turn.
And yes, rounds can "cook off" in a hot breech, causing extensive damage. But if that happened it would also destroy the vehicle. At least it would with a main gun round, or any explosive round.
But what about the case of squads, where one guy has his rifle jam and it takes that away from the entire squad? At least let's get that fixed so an entire sqaud doesn't lose the use of a weapon for more than a turn. The only actual incident I've ever heard of where an entire squad suffered a failure of their rifles was with the early M-16's that would jam if a little dirt got in the chamber. This was fixed by adding a bolt "assist" lever to the right side, allowing the bolt to be forced home even if it was a bit dirty. That's the mod that changed the M-16 to the M-16A1.
And yes, rounds can "cook off" in a hot breech, causing extensive damage. But if that happened it would also destroy the vehicle. At least it would with a main gun round, or any explosive round.
But what about the case of squads, where one guy has his rifle jam and it takes that away from the entire squad? At least let's get that fixed so an entire sqaud doesn't lose the use of a weapon for more than a turn. The only actual incident I've ever heard of where an entire squad suffered a failure of their rifles was with the early M-16's that would jam if a little dirt got in the chamber. This was fixed by adding a bolt "assist" lever to the right side, allowing the bolt to be forced home even if it was a bit dirty. That's the mod that changed the M-16 to the M-16A1.
What, me worry?
- Paul Vebber
- Posts: 5342
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2000 4:00 pm
- Location: Portsmouth RI
- Contact:
I've never seen primary infantry weapons jam. I've often (not THAT often actually) seen squad LMGs jam, and sometimes hand grenades for some reason.
One explanation to the "quick" vehicle immobility repairs: sometimes the tank might be stuck in mud or other terrain "features" - while the crew is still inside they will be able to get free using the tracks. Possibly.
One explanation to the "quick" vehicle immobility repairs: sometimes the tank might be stuck in mud or other terrain "features" - while the crew is still inside they will be able to get free using the tracks. Possibly.
- Charles2222
- Posts: 3687
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2001 10:00 am
Actually ratio-wise, wouldn't you say, particularly the rifles and LMGs don't jam enough? I can't recall the last time I saw this happen (but I also don't fight with small-arms that terribly much). It also may be a bit mistaken to characterise the jam as 'one' jamming or broken and therefore extending to the whole lot, but rather that maybe the majority are broken/jammed as such, and that the program only bothers to break the entire set of that category of weapon when the majority are unuseable. Yeah, they should repair often enough in battle, but I must say I am pleased with the AFV immobility getting fixed quicker. It does make for some interesting situations when perhaps you expect the enemy armor is destroyed, only to find one of the earlier broken ones got repaired and comes charging out of nowhere when you had your guard largely down.
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2001 8:00 am
- Location: Staten Island, NY, wargame captial of the US
- Contact:
Originally posted by Svennemir
I've never seen primary infantry weapons jam.
Played "Russian Steel"? Apalling breakdowns have plagued my tanks and infantry weapons, always at the worst possible time (45mm ATG with clear short-range shot at PzKwIII, for example)
My take on the "grenade jam" -- the guys are crawling around in the brush and some grenades get knocked off jacket pockets or out of pouches, so the squad has fewer than they think they do. Later, an enemy sniper picks them up and close assaults your tank! (Paul, do I get a Marvel Comics style "No Prize" for that?)I've often (not THAT often actually) seen squad LMGs jam, and sometimes hand grenades for some reason.
Seriously, all 1st person combat accounts I've read speak of the amazing amount of lost/discarded weapons and equipement on a battlefield.
Jeff
- Charles2222
- Posts: 3687
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2001 10:00 am
Jeff_Ewing:
That would seem to defend the Tiger-slaying sniper syndrome, but on the other side of the equation, what about the sniper that blows up out of thin air, because he picked up a booby-trapped weapon?Seriously, all 1st person combat accounts I've read speak of the amazing amount of lost/discarded weapons and equipement on a battlefield.
- Belisarius
- Posts: 3099
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2001 8:00 am
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
As frustrating as it is, weapons breakdowns can be ALOT of fun!
When it happens, it's usually my best positioned MG crew or Tank that gets a jam (or whatever). This might of course not be the case, but that's when I really notice it happening. *grr* So I leave the unit alone, knowing it won't do any good and usually only move it occasionally. WHEN, at a later stage in the battle, the crew fixes it (ta-daaa), and by this time it's usually positioned somewhere I never would have placed it if it was operational AND this location often turns up to have a great advantage.
It's almost like having a tank/MG teleported right into the place you need it to be. To have, or not to have, an MG in the right place can easily be decisive for a whole flank...
When it happens, it's usually my best positioned MG crew or Tank that gets a jam (or whatever). This might of course not be the case, but that's when I really notice it happening. *grr* So I leave the unit alone, knowing it won't do any good and usually only move it occasionally. WHEN, at a later stage in the battle, the crew fixes it (ta-daaa), and by this time it's usually positioned somewhere I never would have placed it if it was operational AND this location often turns up to have a great advantage.
It's almost like having a tank/MG teleported right into the place you need it to be. To have, or not to have, an MG in the right place can easily be decisive for a whole flank...
I have never had a weapon that brokedown get repaired. I have tried moving the unit well behind the battle, but it never has mattered. So I no longer use the weapons breakdown preference.
On the other hand, I have vehicles breakdown and get repaired all the time. So I do use the vehicle breakdown preference.
On the other hand, I have vehicles breakdown and get repaired all the time. So I do use the vehicle breakdown preference.
- Fallschirmjager
- Posts: 3555
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
- Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
If you turn off the preference how do you expect to ever see it?
I can understand weapons getting repaired.
I can also understand vehicles becoming mobile again after smashing through a house or getting stuck on a terrain feature.
But taking an RPG in the side and getting it running again? I mean come on youd need a few days or even a few weeks to get an armor patch and the engine/gun/tracks/optics/barrel repaired. The US is the only ones I know that repaired their dameged vehicles on a reguar basis. Thats why the Germans when they got the chance put some extra rounds into the vehicle for good measure.
I can understand weapons getting repaired.
I can also understand vehicles becoming mobile again after smashing through a house or getting stuck on a terrain feature.
But taking an RPG in the side and getting it running again? I mean come on youd need a few days or even a few weeks to get an armor patch and the engine/gun/tracks/optics/barrel repaired. The US is the only ones I know that repaired their dameged vehicles on a reguar basis. Thats why the Germans when they got the chance put some extra rounds into the vehicle for good measure.
- Charles2222
- Posts: 3687
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2001 10:00 am
- Belisarius
- Posts: 3099
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2001 8:00 am
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
I'll second you on that, Charles.
The Germans had excellent field repair shops (and a truly devoted mechanics corps..). Short of a completely burned out tank, most "destroyed" tanks were operational a few days later, or cannibalized for parts. They went to great lengths recovering disabled tanks, even under fire. Every division had at least one, if not many, tank repair shops.
If this was a practice adopted due to the shortage of new tanks, or just a standard army procedure is beyond my knowledge, but my guess is the former.
Anyway, the English, Russian and U.S. troops all noted the German efficiency and probably adopted their own versions.
Putting extra rounds in a dead tank was, AFAIK, practice on all sides, as HEAT does very little structural damage to a vehicle = easy claimed for repairs.
The Germans had excellent field repair shops (and a truly devoted mechanics corps..). Short of a completely burned out tank, most "destroyed" tanks were operational a few days later, or cannibalized for parts. They went to great lengths recovering disabled tanks, even under fire. Every division had at least one, if not many, tank repair shops.
If this was a practice adopted due to the shortage of new tanks, or just a standard army procedure is beyond my knowledge, but my guess is the former.
Anyway, the English, Russian and U.S. troops all noted the German efficiency and probably adopted their own versions.
Putting extra rounds in a dead tank was, AFAIK, practice on all sides, as HEAT does very little structural damage to a vehicle = easy claimed for repairs.
-
- Posts: 1178
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 8:00 am
- Location: Tucson, AZ
I, too, never recall having a weapon repaired.
But my vehicles get repaired on a fairly regular basis, if they were immobilized as a result of movement, not fire.
It also seems that when a vehicle does get immobilized, it's always with his side or rear to the enemy line.
But my vehicles get repaired on a fairly regular basis, if they were immobilized as a result of movement, not fire.
It also seems that when a vehicle does get immobilized, it's always with his side or rear to the enemy line.

"Always mystify, mislead, and surprise the enemy, if possible. "
- Stonewall Jackson
- Stonewall Jackson