An examination into withdrawls

[Obsolete]

With all the fuss going on lately into the withdrawal issue, I decided to look into it again this afternoon for analysis.

So far everything checks out ok, so I'm not sure where the frustration is coming from, especially since I always warn against them unless you're up against no hope to win

Let's look at what's happened in our VERY SIMPLE TO UNDERSTAND EXPERIMENT:



I used the scenario designer to set up some trials. The axis tanks have a 70% quality rating. During the MOVEMENT PHASE, I chose both of these armoured units to switch to withdraw. Their default defense rating was 20, but we can see they auto-changed immediately to 25 because units in withdraw do get a little bit of a defensive bonus, which helps to counter their very risky maneuvers.

Due to an avoidance of (bad luck), and good quality, our rolls (including the -10) modifiers have put both units under our quality rating value of 70 (100 sided die cast). So we successfully pass our W/D checks and are able to leave E-ZoC, as can be clearly seen.

It seems to be working as intended...

[spelk]

Glad your back Obsolete, its been like the old Wild West around here .. [;)]

[sabre1]

If it's working as intended, then this isn't the game for me.

I finish up my PBEM slugfests till you die scenarios, and I'm outta here.

I'm glad it's working, and I will quit complaining now. Shoot I'll even apologize and ride off into the sunset.

[spelk]

ORIGINAL: sabre1
I'm glad it's working, and I will quit complaining now. Shoot I'll even apologize and ride off into the sunset.

Cue the music from The Good, The Bad and the Ugly! [;)]

But seriously, I think a lot of the issues raised have been with specific scenarios, so it might be worth investigating those rather than trying to find the problem in an artificial testbed scenario.

A lot of complaints about Withdrawals and their reliability, so its worth an investigation in situ, surely?

[Fred98]

And here is one where withdrawl did not work.

In the screen shot we have cycled past the German Advance / Withdrawl phase into the US turn

There is a clear hex behind the US unit and he could have withdrawn.

-





-

[sabre1]

Spelk,

I do ride horses, in fact I'm going to be on one in the moutains of CA, this weekend.


Thanks Joe, much appreciated.

[Obsolete]

Glad your back Obsolete, its been like the old Wild West around here .. 

Yes, I had mentioned I would be gone for a short while before I left... Though I figured I can't leave for 5 minutes before the whole forums turn upside down... never fails in any game thread it seems.

But seriously, I think a lot of the issues raised have been with specific scenarios, so it might be worth investigating those rather than trying to find the problem in an artificial testbed scenario.

A lot of complaints about Withdrawals and their reliability, so its worth an investigation in situ, surely?

Yes, I love game investigations & debates. This is the only way we've been able to prove and stop out serious problems in flag-ship titles like TOAW, etc. I'm always interested in looking at data & the nuts & bolts. Though, I am getting sick and tired on other (spefic game forums) where I get the same old -- "I had a 95% chance to kill that Stuart with my Tiger... AND I FAILED!  OMG this game engine is broken!" 

[Obsolete]

In the meantime I"m currently asking even some of the old buddies in the TOAW forums and elsewhere for OPINIONS on this matter.

I also dug out my trusty old TOAW manual (pages falling apart, but still there), on withdrawing from E-ZoC. Despite that TOAW was based on a revolutionary new Time-vs-Action mechanic, the rules are very damn similar:

---

Disengagement: In the real world it can be quite difficult to break contact with enemy units. When you order a unit to move out of a location adjacent to an enemy unit, that unit will attempt to disengage. Successful disengagement results in normal ordered movement.

Disengagement is automatic if: Your unit is a commando unit. Your unit is either a headquarters or artillery unit, and either the original or destination location is occupied by a friendly unit. Your unit is moving to a destination not adjacent to an enemy unit, and there is a friendly unit in the location being vacated.

Your disengagement chance is improved if: Your unit has a large reconnaissance capability. Your unit began the turn with a very high movement allowance relative to the enemy units.

Your disengagement chance is reduced if: The enemy units have a large reconnaissance capability. Your unit began the turn with a low movement allowance relative to the enemy units.

Should your unit fail to disengage cleanly from the enemy it will be subject to a disengagement attack. This is a short, one sided shot at your unit as it attempts to move. The attack is based on the attack strengths of all enemy units involved, and the defense strength of your moving unit. Only the moving unit will take losses, which may force it to retreat, divide into sub units, or (in a worst case) disband.

[Obsolete]

I did some further testing, this time with withdrawl being automaticaly enforced as the result of combats gone wrong. I was able to move these without a problem when properly rolled.

[Fred98]

ORIGINAL: Obsolete

I did some further testing, this time with withdrawl being automaticaly enforced as the result of combats gone wrong.

I was able to move these without a problem when properly rolled.

Refer to post 6 above. The unit did not withdraw.

Or: Withdrawl works sometimes and not other times.

-

[Fred98]

ORIGINAL: Obsolete

In the meantime I"m currently asking .....in the TOAW forums for OPINIONS on this matter

And I asked for opinions in the Banking forums (bankers are always right)

The Bankers agreed the withdrawal feature does not work properly.

Obsolete has been invoiced $200,000.00 advisory fee by the Bankers.
-

[PirateJock]

And I asked for opinions in the Banking forums (bankers are always right)

The Bankers agreed the withdrawal feature does not work properly.

Obsolete has been invoiced $200,000.00 advisory fee by the Bankers.

That bankers thinks it's NOT working is a confirmation that it's OK!

[PirateJock]

As I've mentioned before (post) I think withdrawal is working as designed and is not too far off the money with the way it's implemented.

I work on the following ...

• Withdrawing is a last resort measure
• You can only withdraw if your exit route is clear, e.g. not passing through any EZoCs. If you MUST withdraw try and improve your potential routes out.
• If you're in contact with the enemy it's because (i) you believe you can win or (ii) you want to hold his unit(s) in place. If it's because you want to breakthrough then you need more force applied at that point or if that's not feasible it's better to hold than run. If it's because you want to fix the enemy in place then sit tight, running away won't help.

Possible improvements could be:

• Showing why your withdraw failed, highlighting the blocking enemy unit and/or some text in the combat info box
• Factoring in the unit type - though I don't think, for example, armour will ALWAYS withdraw ... where's the fun in knowing something is definite!
• If you are blocked, then allowing a decision of staying where you are or taking your chances against the blocking unit. This one might be too much micromanagement and affect game flow

Cheers

[Obsolete]

Refer to post 6 above. The unit did not withdraw.

Or: Withdrawl works sometimes and not other times.

Yes, I would expect that. There are checks in place which can either pass or fail, so even if it LOOKS like you COULD you are not guaranteed to do so.

And I asked for opinions in the Banking forums (bankers are always right)

Hmm, I think you're being a bit too hard on those boys. There's a lot of army retiries in the TOAW community, not to mention grognards, and quite a few who have spent a number of hours with Combat Command back in the day...

[Fred98]

ORIGINAL: PirateJock

I work on the following ...

• Withdrawing is a last resort measure........

Cheers

Well no.

Sometimes I attack what I thought was a weak point. I chose badly. Now I want to withdraw and attack somewhere elese.

Sometimes I have a defensive line and wish to pull back the left flank.

Sometimes, on the attack, the defender receives a "withdraw" result. Hooray ! Now I can advance! Except the unit does not withdraw.

-

[PirateJock]

ORIGINAL: Joe 98
Well no.

Sometimes I attack what I thought was a weak point. I chose badly. Now I want to withdraw and attack somewhere elese.

Sometimes I have a defensive line and wish to pull back the left flank.

Sometimes, on the attack, the defender receives a "withdraw" result. Hooray ! Now I can advance! Except the unit does not withdraw.

Hi Joe

In the first 2 examples I would think you'd be able to withdraw as long as your route wasn't blocked by another enemy unit/EZoC. Is that right? With the 3rd example, that is something that should be looked at. If the enemy unit doesn't withdraw it should receive extra damage or possibly surrender. At the moment there isn't anything that represents surrendering is there?

Obsolete posted something in the Combat/Movement thread which I think is also worth thinking about when it comes to trying to disengage ...

ORIGINAL: Obsolete
You don't have to destroy him to become unstuck, if he blinks first, and tries to withdraw during movement phase, he puts no ZoC pressure on you and you're free to break off as well if you want.

Or if he's determined to stick it out, and no one wants to blink first, the moment you can get at least 2 disruptions on him, he'll be forced into an auto-withdraw and again, this leaves you with no pressure from his ZoC, even if he fails to break off, you got him dead-to-rights since it's unlikely for him to shake off his disruptions while adjacant to you, unless you end up doing something similar.

Units at level 2+ disruptions are not going to pin you, and as a side-note, when enemy tanks come at you, you can try to put a river between you, which negates his ZoC from spilling over the hex-sides.

Cheers

[Fred98]

ORIGINAL: PirateJock

.....the moment you can get at least 2 disruptions on him, he'll be forced into an auto-withdraw

Refer to my screen shot at post 6 in this thread. The unit is at dirsruption 4

It should have withdrawn as a result of the combat and did not

The unit is at disruption 4 and should have auto withdrawn and did not!

-

[sabre1]

Shouldn't a unit that recieves a withdrawl during combat and cannot withdraw be destroyed?

[PirateJock]

ORIGINAL: Joe 98
Refer to my screen shot at post 6 in this thread. The unit is at dirsruption 4

It should have withdrawn as a result of the combat and did not

The unit is at disruption 4 and should have auto withdrawn and did not!

Hi Joe

I agree, from what you can see in the screenshot, you would have thought the unit has a clear route into the hex with the road. The only thing I can think of is that as he's D4 he's got a long way to go (15 movement points) so maybe somewhere along the way he's moving into an EZoC that's stopping the withdrawal ... possibly ... maybe! This is one of those situations where the unit, if the unit is unable to withdraw, it should surrender or be destroyed.

Cheers

[PirateJock]

ORIGINAL: sabre1
Shouldn't a unit that recieves a withdrawl during combat and cannot withdraw be destroyed?

There should be some extra damage caused if a unit should withdraw but can't. Maybe only being destroyed/surrender if it's at D4 though. There's one for the wishlist [;)]

Cheers